Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy.

Kenneth L. Allen, Diana Galvis, Ralph Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purposes of this pilot study were: 1. to compare two methods of teaching dental anatomy-CD + lab vs. standard lecture + lab; and 2. to determine whether actively chewing gum during lecture, lab and studying would have an effect on learning. Only the written examination average scores for the gum vs. no gum chewing groups showed differences that appear to be educationally meaningful, though not statistically significant because of the limited number of subjects in this pilot study. This pilot study suggests that: 1. the cost-effective method of using a self-study CD is as educationally effective as a standard lecture; 2. gum chewing resulted in higher scores in the written examination; and 3. future, full-sized studies should be conducted to confirm these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-33
Number of pages4
JournalThe New York state dental journal
Volume72
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Chewing Gum
Anatomy
Tooth
Teaching
Gingiva
Learning
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy. / Allen, Kenneth L.; Galvis, Diana; Katz, Ralph.

In: The New York state dental journal, Vol. 72, No. 4, 06.2006, p. 30-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allen, Kenneth L. ; Galvis, Diana ; Katz, Ralph. / Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy. In: The New York state dental journal. 2006 ; Vol. 72, No. 4. pp. 30-33.
@article{d3fcd6ca9ffa483cbcf42877785ecc04,
title = "Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy.",
abstract = "The purposes of this pilot study were: 1. to compare two methods of teaching dental anatomy-CD + lab vs. standard lecture + lab; and 2. to determine whether actively chewing gum during lecture, lab and studying would have an effect on learning. Only the written examination average scores for the gum vs. no gum chewing groups showed differences that appear to be educationally meaningful, though not statistically significant because of the limited number of subjects in this pilot study. This pilot study suggests that: 1. the cost-effective method of using a self-study CD is as educationally effective as a standard lecture; 2. gum chewing resulted in higher scores in the written examination; and 3. future, full-sized studies should be conducted to confirm these findings.",
author = "Allen, {Kenneth L.} and Diana Galvis and Ralph Katz",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "30--33",
journal = "New York State Dental Journal",
issn = "0028-7571",
publisher = "New York State Dental Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy.

AU - Allen, Kenneth L.

AU - Galvis, Diana

AU - Katz, Ralph

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - The purposes of this pilot study were: 1. to compare two methods of teaching dental anatomy-CD + lab vs. standard lecture + lab; and 2. to determine whether actively chewing gum during lecture, lab and studying would have an effect on learning. Only the written examination average scores for the gum vs. no gum chewing groups showed differences that appear to be educationally meaningful, though not statistically significant because of the limited number of subjects in this pilot study. This pilot study suggests that: 1. the cost-effective method of using a self-study CD is as educationally effective as a standard lecture; 2. gum chewing resulted in higher scores in the written examination; and 3. future, full-sized studies should be conducted to confirm these findings.

AB - The purposes of this pilot study were: 1. to compare two methods of teaching dental anatomy-CD + lab vs. standard lecture + lab; and 2. to determine whether actively chewing gum during lecture, lab and studying would have an effect on learning. Only the written examination average scores for the gum vs. no gum chewing groups showed differences that appear to be educationally meaningful, though not statistically significant because of the limited number of subjects in this pilot study. This pilot study suggests that: 1. the cost-effective method of using a self-study CD is as educationally effective as a standard lecture; 2. gum chewing resulted in higher scores in the written examination; and 3. future, full-sized studies should be conducted to confirm these findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750116892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750116892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16925010

AN - SCOPUS:33750116892

VL - 72

SP - 30

EP - 33

JO - New York State Dental Journal

JF - New York State Dental Journal

SN - 0028-7571

IS - 4

ER -