Evaluation of an electronic module for reconciling medications in home health plans of care

Heidi S. Kramer, Bryan Gibson, Yarden Livnat, Iona Thraen, Abraham Brody, Randall Rupper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Transitions in patient care pose an increased risk to patient safety. One way to reduce this risk is to ensure accurate medication reconciliation during the transition. Here we present an evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module we developed to reduce the transition risk in patients referred for home healthcare. Methods: Nineteen physicians with experience in managing home health referrals were recruited to participate in this within-subjects experiment. Participants completed medication reconciliation for three clinical cases in each of two conditions. The first condition (paper-based) simulated current practice – reconciling medication discrepancies between a paper plan of care (CMS 485) and a simulated Electronic Health Record (EHR). For the second condition (electronic) participants used our medication reconciliation module, which we integrated into the simulated EHR. To evaluate the effectiveness of our medication reconciliation module, we employed repeated measures ANOVA to test the hypotheses that the module will: 1) Improve accuracy by reducing the number of unaddressed medication discrepancies, 2) Improve efficiency by reducing the reconciliation time, 3) have good perceived usability. Results: The improved accuracy hypothesis is supported. Participants left more discrepancies unaddressed in the paper-based condition than the electronic condition, F (1,1) = 22.3, p <0.0001 (Paper Mean = 1.55, SD = 1.20; Electronic Mean = 0.45, SD = 0.65). However, contrary to our efficiency hypothesis, participants took the same amount of time to complete cases in the two conditions, F (1, 1) =0.007, p = 0.93 (Paper Mean = 258.7 seconds, SD = 124.4; Electronic Mean = 260.4 seconds, SD = 158.9). The usability hypothesis is supported by a composite mean ability and confidence score of 6.41 on a 7-point scale, 17 of 19 participants preferring the electronic system and an SUS rating of 86.5. Conclusion: We present the evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module that increases detection and resolution of medication discrepancies compared to a paper-based process. Further work to integrate medication reconciliation within an electronic medical record is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-424
Number of pages13
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 25 2016

Fingerprint

Medication Reconciliation
Health
Delivery of Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Electronic medical equipment
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Composite materials
Patient Safety
Experiments
Patient Care
Analysis of Variance
Referral and Consultation
Physicians

Keywords

  • Electronic medical records
  • Home health agency referrals
  • Medical transition care
  • Medication reconciliation
  • Patient safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Evaluation of an electronic module for reconciling medications in home health plans of care. / Kramer, Heidi S.; Gibson, Bryan; Livnat, Yarden; Thraen, Iona; Brody, Abraham; Rupper, Randall.

In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 25.05.2016, p. 412-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kramer, Heidi S. ; Gibson, Bryan ; Livnat, Yarden ; Thraen, Iona ; Brody, Abraham ; Rupper, Randall. / Evaluation of an electronic module for reconciling medications in home health plans of care. In: Applied Clinical Informatics. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 412-424.
@article{88ba619fc5fb4e58bf04155411590184,
title = "Evaluation of an electronic module for reconciling medications in home health plans of care",
abstract = "Objectives: Transitions in patient care pose an increased risk to patient safety. One way to reduce this risk is to ensure accurate medication reconciliation during the transition. Here we present an evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module we developed to reduce the transition risk in patients referred for home healthcare. Methods: Nineteen physicians with experience in managing home health referrals were recruited to participate in this within-subjects experiment. Participants completed medication reconciliation for three clinical cases in each of two conditions. The first condition (paper-based) simulated current practice – reconciling medication discrepancies between a paper plan of care (CMS 485) and a simulated Electronic Health Record (EHR). For the second condition (electronic) participants used our medication reconciliation module, which we integrated into the simulated EHR. To evaluate the effectiveness of our medication reconciliation module, we employed repeated measures ANOVA to test the hypotheses that the module will: 1) Improve accuracy by reducing the number of unaddressed medication discrepancies, 2) Improve efficiency by reducing the reconciliation time, 3) have good perceived usability. Results: The improved accuracy hypothesis is supported. Participants left more discrepancies unaddressed in the paper-based condition than the electronic condition, F (1,1) = 22.3, p <0.0001 (Paper Mean = 1.55, SD = 1.20; Electronic Mean = 0.45, SD = 0.65). However, contrary to our efficiency hypothesis, participants took the same amount of time to complete cases in the two conditions, F (1, 1) =0.007, p = 0.93 (Paper Mean = 258.7 seconds, SD = 124.4; Electronic Mean = 260.4 seconds, SD = 158.9). The usability hypothesis is supported by a composite mean ability and confidence score of 6.41 on a 7-point scale, 17 of 19 participants preferring the electronic system and an SUS rating of 86.5. Conclusion: We present the evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module that increases detection and resolution of medication discrepancies compared to a paper-based process. Further work to integrate medication reconciliation within an electronic medical record is warranted.",
keywords = "Electronic medical records, Home health agency referrals, Medical transition care, Medication reconciliation, Patient safety",
author = "Kramer, {Heidi S.} and Bryan Gibson and Yarden Livnat and Iona Thraen and Abraham Brody and Randall Rupper",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "25",
doi = "10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0154",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "412--424",
journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
issn = "1869-0327",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an electronic module for reconciling medications in home health plans of care

AU - Kramer, Heidi S.

AU - Gibson, Bryan

AU - Livnat, Yarden

AU - Thraen, Iona

AU - Brody, Abraham

AU - Rupper, Randall

PY - 2016/5/25

Y1 - 2016/5/25

N2 - Objectives: Transitions in patient care pose an increased risk to patient safety. One way to reduce this risk is to ensure accurate medication reconciliation during the transition. Here we present an evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module we developed to reduce the transition risk in patients referred for home healthcare. Methods: Nineteen physicians with experience in managing home health referrals were recruited to participate in this within-subjects experiment. Participants completed medication reconciliation for three clinical cases in each of two conditions. The first condition (paper-based) simulated current practice – reconciling medication discrepancies between a paper plan of care (CMS 485) and a simulated Electronic Health Record (EHR). For the second condition (electronic) participants used our medication reconciliation module, which we integrated into the simulated EHR. To evaluate the effectiveness of our medication reconciliation module, we employed repeated measures ANOVA to test the hypotheses that the module will: 1) Improve accuracy by reducing the number of unaddressed medication discrepancies, 2) Improve efficiency by reducing the reconciliation time, 3) have good perceived usability. Results: The improved accuracy hypothesis is supported. Participants left more discrepancies unaddressed in the paper-based condition than the electronic condition, F (1,1) = 22.3, p <0.0001 (Paper Mean = 1.55, SD = 1.20; Electronic Mean = 0.45, SD = 0.65). However, contrary to our efficiency hypothesis, participants took the same amount of time to complete cases in the two conditions, F (1, 1) =0.007, p = 0.93 (Paper Mean = 258.7 seconds, SD = 124.4; Electronic Mean = 260.4 seconds, SD = 158.9). The usability hypothesis is supported by a composite mean ability and confidence score of 6.41 on a 7-point scale, 17 of 19 participants preferring the electronic system and an SUS rating of 86.5. Conclusion: We present the evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module that increases detection and resolution of medication discrepancies compared to a paper-based process. Further work to integrate medication reconciliation within an electronic medical record is warranted.

AB - Objectives: Transitions in patient care pose an increased risk to patient safety. One way to reduce this risk is to ensure accurate medication reconciliation during the transition. Here we present an evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module we developed to reduce the transition risk in patients referred for home healthcare. Methods: Nineteen physicians with experience in managing home health referrals were recruited to participate in this within-subjects experiment. Participants completed medication reconciliation for three clinical cases in each of two conditions. The first condition (paper-based) simulated current practice – reconciling medication discrepancies between a paper plan of care (CMS 485) and a simulated Electronic Health Record (EHR). For the second condition (electronic) participants used our medication reconciliation module, which we integrated into the simulated EHR. To evaluate the effectiveness of our medication reconciliation module, we employed repeated measures ANOVA to test the hypotheses that the module will: 1) Improve accuracy by reducing the number of unaddressed medication discrepancies, 2) Improve efficiency by reducing the reconciliation time, 3) have good perceived usability. Results: The improved accuracy hypothesis is supported. Participants left more discrepancies unaddressed in the paper-based condition than the electronic condition, F (1,1) = 22.3, p <0.0001 (Paper Mean = 1.55, SD = 1.20; Electronic Mean = 0.45, SD = 0.65). However, contrary to our efficiency hypothesis, participants took the same amount of time to complete cases in the two conditions, F (1, 1) =0.007, p = 0.93 (Paper Mean = 258.7 seconds, SD = 124.4; Electronic Mean = 260.4 seconds, SD = 158.9). The usability hypothesis is supported by a composite mean ability and confidence score of 6.41 on a 7-point scale, 17 of 19 participants preferring the electronic system and an SUS rating of 86.5. Conclusion: We present the evaluation of an electronic medication reconciliation module that increases detection and resolution of medication discrepancies compared to a paper-based process. Further work to integrate medication reconciliation within an electronic medical record is warranted.

KW - Electronic medical records

KW - Home health agency referrals

KW - Medical transition care

KW - Medication reconciliation

KW - Patient safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970038942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970038942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0154

DO - 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0154

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 412

EP - 424

JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

SN - 1869-0327

IS - 2

ER -