Evaluation of ambiguous associations in the amygdala by learning the structure of the environment

Tamas J. Madarasz, Lorenzo Diaz-Mataix, Omar Akhand, Edgar A. Ycu, Joseph Ledoux, Joshua P. Johansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recognizing predictive relationships is critical for survival, but an understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms remains elusive. In particular, it is unclear how the brain distinguishes predictive relationships from spurious ones when evidence about a relationship is ambiguous, or how it computes predictions given such uncertainty. To better understand this process, we introduced ambiguity into an associative learning task by presenting aversive outcomes both in the presence and in the absence of a predictive cue. Electrophysiological and optogenetic approaches revealed that amygdala neurons directly regulated and tracked the effects of ambiguity on learning. Contrary to established accounts of associative learning, however, interference from competing associations was not required to assess an ambiguous cue–outcome contingency. Instead, animals' behavior was explained by a normative account that evaluates different models of the environment's statistical structure. These findings suggest an alternative view of amygdala circuits in resolving ambiguity during aversive learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNature Neuroscience
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 23 2016

Fingerprint

Amygdala
Learning
Optogenetics
Animal Behavior
Statistical Models
Uncertainty
Cues
Neurons
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of ambiguous associations in the amygdala by learning the structure of the environment. / Madarasz, Tamas J.; Diaz-Mataix, Lorenzo; Akhand, Omar; Ycu, Edgar A.; Ledoux, Joseph; Johansen, Joshua P.

In: Nature Neuroscience, 23.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Madarasz, Tamas J. ; Diaz-Mataix, Lorenzo ; Akhand, Omar ; Ycu, Edgar A. ; Ledoux, Joseph ; Johansen, Joshua P. / Evaluation of ambiguous associations in the amygdala by learning the structure of the environment. In: Nature Neuroscience. 2016.
@article{211b9864b66649ddafb0180da2b6d3b6,
title = "Evaluation of ambiguous associations in the amygdala by learning the structure of the environment",
abstract = "Recognizing predictive relationships is critical for survival, but an understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms remains elusive. In particular, it is unclear how the brain distinguishes predictive relationships from spurious ones when evidence about a relationship is ambiguous, or how it computes predictions given such uncertainty. To better understand this process, we introduced ambiguity into an associative learning task by presenting aversive outcomes both in the presence and in the absence of a predictive cue. Electrophysiological and optogenetic approaches revealed that amygdala neurons directly regulated and tracked the effects of ambiguity on learning. Contrary to established accounts of associative learning, however, interference from competing associations was not required to assess an ambiguous cue–outcome contingency. Instead, animals' behavior was explained by a normative account that evaluates different models of the environment's statistical structure. These findings suggest an alternative view of amygdala circuits in resolving ambiguity during aversive learning.",
author = "Madarasz, {Tamas J.} and Lorenzo Diaz-Mataix and Omar Akhand and Ycu, {Edgar A.} and Joseph Ledoux and Johansen, {Joshua P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1038/nn.4308",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Nature Neuroscience",
issn = "1097-6256",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of ambiguous associations in the amygdala by learning the structure of the environment

AU - Madarasz, Tamas J.

AU - Diaz-Mataix, Lorenzo

AU - Akhand, Omar

AU - Ycu, Edgar A.

AU - Ledoux, Joseph

AU - Johansen, Joshua P.

PY - 2016/5/23

Y1 - 2016/5/23

N2 - Recognizing predictive relationships is critical for survival, but an understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms remains elusive. In particular, it is unclear how the brain distinguishes predictive relationships from spurious ones when evidence about a relationship is ambiguous, or how it computes predictions given such uncertainty. To better understand this process, we introduced ambiguity into an associative learning task by presenting aversive outcomes both in the presence and in the absence of a predictive cue. Electrophysiological and optogenetic approaches revealed that amygdala neurons directly regulated and tracked the effects of ambiguity on learning. Contrary to established accounts of associative learning, however, interference from competing associations was not required to assess an ambiguous cue–outcome contingency. Instead, animals' behavior was explained by a normative account that evaluates different models of the environment's statistical structure. These findings suggest an alternative view of amygdala circuits in resolving ambiguity during aversive learning.

AB - Recognizing predictive relationships is critical for survival, but an understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms remains elusive. In particular, it is unclear how the brain distinguishes predictive relationships from spurious ones when evidence about a relationship is ambiguous, or how it computes predictions given such uncertainty. To better understand this process, we introduced ambiguity into an associative learning task by presenting aversive outcomes both in the presence and in the absence of a predictive cue. Electrophysiological and optogenetic approaches revealed that amygdala neurons directly regulated and tracked the effects of ambiguity on learning. Contrary to established accounts of associative learning, however, interference from competing associations was not required to assess an ambiguous cue–outcome contingency. Instead, animals' behavior was explained by a normative account that evaluates different models of the environment's statistical structure. These findings suggest an alternative view of amygdala circuits in resolving ambiguity during aversive learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969749794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969749794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nn.4308

DO - 10.1038/nn.4308

M3 - Article

JO - Nature Neuroscience

JF - Nature Neuroscience

SN - 1097-6256

ER -