Evaluation of a nanometer roughness scale resorbable media-processed surface: A study in dogs

Charles Marin, Rodrigo Granato, Estevam A. Bonfante, Marcelo Suzuki, Malvin N. Janal, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the biomechanical fixation and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of implants with different surfaces treatment (experimental - resorbable blasting media-processed nanometer roughness scale surface, and control - dual acid-etched) in a dog model. Material and methods: Surface characterization was made in six implants by means of scanning electron microscopic imaging, atomic force microscopy to evaluate roughness parameters, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for chemical assessment. The animal model comprised the bilateral placement of control (n=24) and experimental surface (n=24) implants along the proximal tibiae of six mongrel dogs, which remained in place for 2 or 4 weeks. Half of the specimens were biomechanically tested (torque), and the other half was subjected to histomorphologic/morphometric evaluation. BIC and resistance to failure measures were each evaluated as a function of time and surface treatment in a mixed model ANOVA. Results: Surface texturing was significantly higher for the experimental compared with the control surface. The survey XPS spectra detected O, C, Al, and Ti at the control group, and Ca (~0.2-0.9%) and P (~1.7-4.1%) besides O, C, Al, and Ti at experimental surfaces. While no statistical difference in BIC was found between experimental and control surfaces or between 2 and 4 weeks in vivo, both longer time and use of experimental surface significantly increased resistance to failure. Conclusions: The experimental surface resulted in enhanced biomechanical fixation but comparable BIC relative to control, suggesting higher bone mechanical properties around the experimental implants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Dogs
Bone and Bones
Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Experimental Implants
Atomic Force Microscopy
Torque
Tibia
Analysis of Variance
Animal Models
Electrons
Control Groups
Acids

Keywords

  • Animal experiments
  • Biomechanical testing
  • Dental implant
  • Histology
  • Surface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Evaluation of a nanometer roughness scale resorbable media-processed surface : A study in dogs. / Marin, Charles; Granato, Rodrigo; Bonfante, Estevam A.; Suzuki, Marcelo; Janal, Malvin N.; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 119-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marin, Charles ; Granato, Rodrigo ; Bonfante, Estevam A. ; Suzuki, Marcelo ; Janal, Malvin N. ; Coelho, Paulo. / Evaluation of a nanometer roughness scale resorbable media-processed surface : A study in dogs. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 119-124.
@article{6f470e4cae6e4e94979b1d4a51269136,
title = "Evaluation of a nanometer roughness scale resorbable media-processed surface: A study in dogs",
abstract = "Objectives: This study compared the biomechanical fixation and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of implants with different surfaces treatment (experimental - resorbable blasting media-processed nanometer roughness scale surface, and control - dual acid-etched) in a dog model. Material and methods: Surface characterization was made in six implants by means of scanning electron microscopic imaging, atomic force microscopy to evaluate roughness parameters, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for chemical assessment. The animal model comprised the bilateral placement of control (n=24) and experimental surface (n=24) implants along the proximal tibiae of six mongrel dogs, which remained in place for 2 or 4 weeks. Half of the specimens were biomechanically tested (torque), and the other half was subjected to histomorphologic/morphometric evaluation. BIC and resistance to failure measures were each evaluated as a function of time and surface treatment in a mixed model ANOVA. Results: Surface texturing was significantly higher for the experimental compared with the control surface. The survey XPS spectra detected O, C, Al, and Ti at the control group, and Ca (~0.2-0.9{\%}) and P (~1.7-4.1{\%}) besides O, C, Al, and Ti at experimental surfaces. While no statistical difference in BIC was found between experimental and control surfaces or between 2 and 4 weeks in vivo, both longer time and use of experimental surface significantly increased resistance to failure. Conclusions: The experimental surface resulted in enhanced biomechanical fixation but comparable BIC relative to control, suggesting higher bone mechanical properties around the experimental implants.",
keywords = "Animal experiments, Biomechanical testing, Dental implant, Histology, Surface",
author = "Charles Marin and Rodrigo Granato and Bonfante, {Estevam A.} and Marcelo Suzuki and Janal, {Malvin N.} and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02155.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "119--124",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a nanometer roughness scale resorbable media-processed surface

T2 - A study in dogs

AU - Marin, Charles

AU - Granato, Rodrigo

AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.

AU - Suzuki, Marcelo

AU - Janal, Malvin N.

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Objectives: This study compared the biomechanical fixation and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of implants with different surfaces treatment (experimental - resorbable blasting media-processed nanometer roughness scale surface, and control - dual acid-etched) in a dog model. Material and methods: Surface characterization was made in six implants by means of scanning electron microscopic imaging, atomic force microscopy to evaluate roughness parameters, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for chemical assessment. The animal model comprised the bilateral placement of control (n=24) and experimental surface (n=24) implants along the proximal tibiae of six mongrel dogs, which remained in place for 2 or 4 weeks. Half of the specimens were biomechanically tested (torque), and the other half was subjected to histomorphologic/morphometric evaluation. BIC and resistance to failure measures were each evaluated as a function of time and surface treatment in a mixed model ANOVA. Results: Surface texturing was significantly higher for the experimental compared with the control surface. The survey XPS spectra detected O, C, Al, and Ti at the control group, and Ca (~0.2-0.9%) and P (~1.7-4.1%) besides O, C, Al, and Ti at experimental surfaces. While no statistical difference in BIC was found between experimental and control surfaces or between 2 and 4 weeks in vivo, both longer time and use of experimental surface significantly increased resistance to failure. Conclusions: The experimental surface resulted in enhanced biomechanical fixation but comparable BIC relative to control, suggesting higher bone mechanical properties around the experimental implants.

AB - Objectives: This study compared the biomechanical fixation and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of implants with different surfaces treatment (experimental - resorbable blasting media-processed nanometer roughness scale surface, and control - dual acid-etched) in a dog model. Material and methods: Surface characterization was made in six implants by means of scanning electron microscopic imaging, atomic force microscopy to evaluate roughness parameters, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for chemical assessment. The animal model comprised the bilateral placement of control (n=24) and experimental surface (n=24) implants along the proximal tibiae of six mongrel dogs, which remained in place for 2 or 4 weeks. Half of the specimens were biomechanically tested (torque), and the other half was subjected to histomorphologic/morphometric evaluation. BIC and resistance to failure measures were each evaluated as a function of time and surface treatment in a mixed model ANOVA. Results: Surface texturing was significantly higher for the experimental compared with the control surface. The survey XPS spectra detected O, C, Al, and Ti at the control group, and Ca (~0.2-0.9%) and P (~1.7-4.1%) besides O, C, Al, and Ti at experimental surfaces. While no statistical difference in BIC was found between experimental and control surfaces or between 2 and 4 weeks in vivo, both longer time and use of experimental surface significantly increased resistance to failure. Conclusions: The experimental surface resulted in enhanced biomechanical fixation but comparable BIC relative to control, suggesting higher bone mechanical properties around the experimental implants.

KW - Animal experiments

KW - Biomechanical testing

KW - Dental implant

KW - Histology

KW - Surface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155165079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84155165079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02155.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02155.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21518007

AN - SCOPUS:84155165079

VL - 23

SP - 119

EP - 124

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 1

ER -