Evaluation is a Dynamic Process: Moving Beyond Dual System Models

Jay Van Bavel, Yi Jenny Xiao, William A. Cunningham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over the past few decades, dual attitude/process/system models have emerged as the dominant framework for understanding a wide range of psychological phenomena. Most of these models characterize the unconscious and conscious mind as being built from discrete processes or systems: one that is reflexive, automatic, fast, affective, associative, and primitive, and a second that is deliberative, controlled, slow, cognitive, propositional, and more uniquely human. Although these models serve as a useful heuristic for characterizing the human mind, recent developments in social and cognitive neuroscience suggest that the human evaluative system, like most of cognition, is widely distributed and highly dynamic. Integrating these advances with current attitude theories, we review how the recently proposed Iterative Reprocessing Model can account for apparent dual systems as well as discrepancies between traditional dual system models and recent research revealing the dynamic nature of evaluation. Furthermore, we describe important implications this dynamical system approach has for various social psychological domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-454
Number of pages17
JournalSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Psychology
Cognition
Research
Cognitive Neuroscience
Unconscious (Psychology)
Heuristics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Evaluation is a Dynamic Process : Moving Beyond Dual System Models. / Van Bavel, Jay; Jenny Xiao, Yi; Cunningham, William A.

In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 6, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 438-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Bavel, Jay ; Jenny Xiao, Yi ; Cunningham, William A. / Evaluation is a Dynamic Process : Moving Beyond Dual System Models. In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. 6. pp. 438-454.
@article{328269ffaaf24a1bb1955dcee4036119,
title = "Evaluation is a Dynamic Process: Moving Beyond Dual System Models",
abstract = "Over the past few decades, dual attitude/process/system models have emerged as the dominant framework for understanding a wide range of psychological phenomena. Most of these models characterize the unconscious and conscious mind as being built from discrete processes or systems: one that is reflexive, automatic, fast, affective, associative, and primitive, and a second that is deliberative, controlled, slow, cognitive, propositional, and more uniquely human. Although these models serve as a useful heuristic for characterizing the human mind, recent developments in social and cognitive neuroscience suggest that the human evaluative system, like most of cognition, is widely distributed and highly dynamic. Integrating these advances with current attitude theories, we review how the recently proposed Iterative Reprocessing Model can account for apparent dual systems as well as discrepancies between traditional dual system models and recent research revealing the dynamic nature of evaluation. Furthermore, we describe important implications this dynamical system approach has for various social psychological domains.",
author = "{Van Bavel}, Jay and {Jenny Xiao}, Yi and Cunningham, {William A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00438.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "438--454",
journal = "Social and Personality Psychology Compass",
issn = "1751-9004",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation is a Dynamic Process

T2 - Moving Beyond Dual System Models

AU - Van Bavel, Jay

AU - Jenny Xiao, Yi

AU - Cunningham, William A.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Over the past few decades, dual attitude/process/system models have emerged as the dominant framework for understanding a wide range of psychological phenomena. Most of these models characterize the unconscious and conscious mind as being built from discrete processes or systems: one that is reflexive, automatic, fast, affective, associative, and primitive, and a second that is deliberative, controlled, slow, cognitive, propositional, and more uniquely human. Although these models serve as a useful heuristic for characterizing the human mind, recent developments in social and cognitive neuroscience suggest that the human evaluative system, like most of cognition, is widely distributed and highly dynamic. Integrating these advances with current attitude theories, we review how the recently proposed Iterative Reprocessing Model can account for apparent dual systems as well as discrepancies between traditional dual system models and recent research revealing the dynamic nature of evaluation. Furthermore, we describe important implications this dynamical system approach has for various social psychological domains.

AB - Over the past few decades, dual attitude/process/system models have emerged as the dominant framework for understanding a wide range of psychological phenomena. Most of these models characterize the unconscious and conscious mind as being built from discrete processes or systems: one that is reflexive, automatic, fast, affective, associative, and primitive, and a second that is deliberative, controlled, slow, cognitive, propositional, and more uniquely human. Although these models serve as a useful heuristic for characterizing the human mind, recent developments in social and cognitive neuroscience suggest that the human evaluative system, like most of cognition, is widely distributed and highly dynamic. Integrating these advances with current attitude theories, we review how the recently proposed Iterative Reprocessing Model can account for apparent dual systems as well as discrepancies between traditional dual system models and recent research revealing the dynamic nature of evaluation. Furthermore, we describe important implications this dynamical system approach has for various social psychological domains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861771288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861771288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00438.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00438.x

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 438

EP - 454

JO - Social and Personality Psychology Compass

JF - Social and Personality Psychology Compass

SN - 1751-9004

IS - 6

ER -