Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings

Vaclav Hasik, Naomi E. Anderson, William O. Collinge, Cassandra Lee Thiel, Vikas Khanna, Jason Wirick, Richard Piacentini, Amy E. Landis, Melissa M. Bilec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aging water infrastructure and increased water scarcity have resulted in higher interest in water reuse and decentralization. Rating systems for high-performance buildings implicitly promote the use of building-scale, decentralized water supply and treatment technologies. It is important to recognize the potential benefits and trade-offs of decentralized and centralized water systems in the context of high-performance buildings. For this reason and to fill a gap in the current literature, we completed a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the decentralized water system of a high-performance, net-zero energy, net-zero water building (NZB) that received multiple green building certifications and compared the results with two modeled buildings (conventional and water efficient) using centralized water systems. We investigated the NZB's impacts over varying lifetimes, conducted a break-even analysis, and included Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. The results show that, although the NZB performs better in most categories than the conventional building, the water efficient building generally outperforms the NZB. The lifetime of the NZB, septic tank aeration, and use of solar energy have been found to be important factors in the NZB's impacts. While these findings are specific to the case study building, location, and treatment technologies, the framework for comparison of water and wastewater impacts of various buildings can be applied during building design to aid decision making. As we design and operate high-performance buildings, the potential trade-offs of advanced decentralized water treatment systems should be considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1110-1119
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 7 2017

Fingerprint

Life cycle
life cycle
Water
water
Water treatment
water reuse
water treatment
Septic tanks
architectural design
uncertainty analysis
Uncertainty analysis
certification
decentralization
aeration
Water supply
aid
Solar energy
water supply
Wastewater
decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings. / Hasik, Vaclav; Anderson, Naomi E.; Collinge, William O.; Thiel, Cassandra Lee; Khanna, Vikas; Wirick, Jason; Piacentini, Richard; Landis, Amy E.; Bilec, Melissa M.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 51, No. 3, 07.02.2017, p. 1110-1119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hasik, V, Anderson, NE, Collinge, WO, Thiel, CL, Khanna, V, Wirick, J, Piacentini, R, Landis, AE & Bilec, MM 2017, 'Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings', Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1110-1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03879
Hasik, Vaclav ; Anderson, Naomi E. ; Collinge, William O. ; Thiel, Cassandra Lee ; Khanna, Vikas ; Wirick, Jason ; Piacentini, Richard ; Landis, Amy E. ; Bilec, Melissa M. / Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2017 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 1110-1119.
@article{7fbb7e968ad249b4b80fdb31e2657a72,
title = "Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings",
abstract = "Aging water infrastructure and increased water scarcity have resulted in higher interest in water reuse and decentralization. Rating systems for high-performance buildings implicitly promote the use of building-scale, decentralized water supply and treatment technologies. It is important to recognize the potential benefits and trade-offs of decentralized and centralized water systems in the context of high-performance buildings. For this reason and to fill a gap in the current literature, we completed a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the decentralized water system of a high-performance, net-zero energy, net-zero water building (NZB) that received multiple green building certifications and compared the results with two modeled buildings (conventional and water efficient) using centralized water systems. We investigated the NZB's impacts over varying lifetimes, conducted a break-even analysis, and included Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. The results show that, although the NZB performs better in most categories than the conventional building, the water efficient building generally outperforms the NZB. The lifetime of the NZB, septic tank aeration, and use of solar energy have been found to be important factors in the NZB's impacts. While these findings are specific to the case study building, location, and treatment technologies, the framework for comparison of water and wastewater impacts of various buildings can be applied during building design to aid decision making. As we design and operate high-performance buildings, the potential trade-offs of advanced decentralized water treatment systems should be considered.",
author = "Vaclav Hasik and Anderson, {Naomi E.} and Collinge, {William O.} and Thiel, {Cassandra Lee} and Vikas Khanna and Jason Wirick and Richard Piacentini and Landis, {Amy E.} and Bilec, {Melissa M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.6b03879",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1110--1119",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings

AU - Hasik, Vaclav

AU - Anderson, Naomi E.

AU - Collinge, William O.

AU - Thiel, Cassandra Lee

AU - Khanna, Vikas

AU - Wirick, Jason

AU - Piacentini, Richard

AU - Landis, Amy E.

AU - Bilec, Melissa M.

PY - 2017/2/7

Y1 - 2017/2/7

N2 - Aging water infrastructure and increased water scarcity have resulted in higher interest in water reuse and decentralization. Rating systems for high-performance buildings implicitly promote the use of building-scale, decentralized water supply and treatment technologies. It is important to recognize the potential benefits and trade-offs of decentralized and centralized water systems in the context of high-performance buildings. For this reason and to fill a gap in the current literature, we completed a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the decentralized water system of a high-performance, net-zero energy, net-zero water building (NZB) that received multiple green building certifications and compared the results with two modeled buildings (conventional and water efficient) using centralized water systems. We investigated the NZB's impacts over varying lifetimes, conducted a break-even analysis, and included Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. The results show that, although the NZB performs better in most categories than the conventional building, the water efficient building generally outperforms the NZB. The lifetime of the NZB, septic tank aeration, and use of solar energy have been found to be important factors in the NZB's impacts. While these findings are specific to the case study building, location, and treatment technologies, the framework for comparison of water and wastewater impacts of various buildings can be applied during building design to aid decision making. As we design and operate high-performance buildings, the potential trade-offs of advanced decentralized water treatment systems should be considered.

AB - Aging water infrastructure and increased water scarcity have resulted in higher interest in water reuse and decentralization. Rating systems for high-performance buildings implicitly promote the use of building-scale, decentralized water supply and treatment technologies. It is important to recognize the potential benefits and trade-offs of decentralized and centralized water systems in the context of high-performance buildings. For this reason and to fill a gap in the current literature, we completed a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the decentralized water system of a high-performance, net-zero energy, net-zero water building (NZB) that received multiple green building certifications and compared the results with two modeled buildings (conventional and water efficient) using centralized water systems. We investigated the NZB's impacts over varying lifetimes, conducted a break-even analysis, and included Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. The results show that, although the NZB performs better in most categories than the conventional building, the water efficient building generally outperforms the NZB. The lifetime of the NZB, septic tank aeration, and use of solar energy have been found to be important factors in the NZB's impacts. While these findings are specific to the case study building, location, and treatment technologies, the framework for comparison of water and wastewater impacts of various buildings can be applied during building design to aid decision making. As we design and operate high-performance buildings, the potential trade-offs of advanced decentralized water treatment systems should be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020447719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020447719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.6b03879

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.6b03879

M3 - Article

C2 - 28002664

AN - SCOPUS:85020447719

VL - 51

SP - 1110

EP - 1119

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 3

ER -