European Fissure Sealant Guidelines: Assessment using AGREE II

L. San Martin-Galindo, F. J. Rodríguez-Lozano, C. Abalos-Labruzzi, Richard Niederman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Pit and fissure sealants are effective in reducing the incidence of occlusal caries, and multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed for recommending their proper use. The usefulness of CPGs depends on their quality and on the rigour of the guideline development process. Objective: A study was made to assess the quality of current European CPGs based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument, which uses 23 key items rated on a 7-point scale to assess practice guideline development and the quality of reporting. Methods: A search was conducted for fissure sealant guidelines for preventing caries in children and adults at high and low risk published in the last 10 years. Calibration was carried out before scoring to assess agreement between the appraisers using the AGREE II instrument. Results: The searches identified 19 relevant guidelines, and following application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, three guidelines were retained for evaluation. The proportion of observed agreement was calculated, expressed by the agreement separately for positive and negative ratings (PA = 0.89, NA = 0-91). The results of the guideline assessments revealed the highest score for the Irish guideline, a moderate score for the French guideline and the lowest score for the European guideline. Conclusions: Based on the AGREE II instrument, the results obtained show significant variation in the quality assessment of the three European Fissure Sealant Guidelines. Future studies should be carried out both to develop quality dental CPGs and to investigate effective ways of adopting them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Dental Hygiene
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

Pit and Fissure Sealants
Guidelines
Practice Guidelines
Calibration
Tooth

Keywords

  • Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II
  • European guidelines
  • Fissure sealants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry (miscellaneous)

Cite this

European Fissure Sealant Guidelines : Assessment using AGREE II. / San Martin-Galindo, L.; Rodríguez-Lozano, F. J.; Abalos-Labruzzi, C.; Niederman, Richard.

In: International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

San Martin-Galindo, L. ; Rodríguez-Lozano, F. J. ; Abalos-Labruzzi, C. ; Niederman, Richard. / European Fissure Sealant Guidelines : Assessment using AGREE II. In: International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2015.
@article{b94a8eb6152f406bac6fa07f86e466ab,
title = "European Fissure Sealant Guidelines: Assessment using AGREE II",
abstract = "Background: Pit and fissure sealants are effective in reducing the incidence of occlusal caries, and multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed for recommending their proper use. The usefulness of CPGs depends on their quality and on the rigour of the guideline development process. Objective: A study was made to assess the quality of current European CPGs based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument, which uses 23 key items rated on a 7-point scale to assess practice guideline development and the quality of reporting. Methods: A search was conducted for fissure sealant guidelines for preventing caries in children and adults at high and low risk published in the last 10 years. Calibration was carried out before scoring to assess agreement between the appraisers using the AGREE II instrument. Results: The searches identified 19 relevant guidelines, and following application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, three guidelines were retained for evaluation. The proportion of observed agreement was calculated, expressed by the agreement separately for positive and negative ratings (PA = 0.89, NA = 0-91). The results of the guideline assessments revealed the highest score for the Irish guideline, a moderate score for the French guideline and the lowest score for the European guideline. Conclusions: Based on the AGREE II instrument, the results obtained show significant variation in the quality assessment of the three European Fissure Sealant Guidelines. Future studies should be carried out both to develop quality dental CPGs and to investigate effective ways of adopting them.",
keywords = "Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II, European guidelines, Fissure sealants",
author = "{San Martin-Galindo}, L. and Rodr{\'i}guez-Lozano, {F. J.} and C. Abalos-Labruzzi and Richard Niederman",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/idh.12174",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Dental Hygiene",
issn = "1601-5029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - European Fissure Sealant Guidelines

T2 - Assessment using AGREE II

AU - San Martin-Galindo, L.

AU - Rodríguez-Lozano, F. J.

AU - Abalos-Labruzzi, C.

AU - Niederman, Richard

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Pit and fissure sealants are effective in reducing the incidence of occlusal caries, and multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed for recommending their proper use. The usefulness of CPGs depends on their quality and on the rigour of the guideline development process. Objective: A study was made to assess the quality of current European CPGs based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument, which uses 23 key items rated on a 7-point scale to assess practice guideline development and the quality of reporting. Methods: A search was conducted for fissure sealant guidelines for preventing caries in children and adults at high and low risk published in the last 10 years. Calibration was carried out before scoring to assess agreement between the appraisers using the AGREE II instrument. Results: The searches identified 19 relevant guidelines, and following application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, three guidelines were retained for evaluation. The proportion of observed agreement was calculated, expressed by the agreement separately for positive and negative ratings (PA = 0.89, NA = 0-91). The results of the guideline assessments revealed the highest score for the Irish guideline, a moderate score for the French guideline and the lowest score for the European guideline. Conclusions: Based on the AGREE II instrument, the results obtained show significant variation in the quality assessment of the three European Fissure Sealant Guidelines. Future studies should be carried out both to develop quality dental CPGs and to investigate effective ways of adopting them.

AB - Background: Pit and fissure sealants are effective in reducing the incidence of occlusal caries, and multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed for recommending their proper use. The usefulness of CPGs depends on their quality and on the rigour of the guideline development process. Objective: A study was made to assess the quality of current European CPGs based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument, which uses 23 key items rated on a 7-point scale to assess practice guideline development and the quality of reporting. Methods: A search was conducted for fissure sealant guidelines for preventing caries in children and adults at high and low risk published in the last 10 years. Calibration was carried out before scoring to assess agreement between the appraisers using the AGREE II instrument. Results: The searches identified 19 relevant guidelines, and following application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, three guidelines were retained for evaluation. The proportion of observed agreement was calculated, expressed by the agreement separately for positive and negative ratings (PA = 0.89, NA = 0-91). The results of the guideline assessments revealed the highest score for the Irish guideline, a moderate score for the French guideline and the lowest score for the European guideline. Conclusions: Based on the AGREE II instrument, the results obtained show significant variation in the quality assessment of the three European Fissure Sealant Guidelines. Future studies should be carried out both to develop quality dental CPGs and to investigate effective ways of adopting them.

KW - Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II

KW - European guidelines

KW - Fissure sealants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941299658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941299658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/idh.12174

DO - 10.1111/idh.12174

M3 - Article

C2 - 26359655

AN - SCOPUS:84941299658

JO - International Journal of Dental Hygiene

JF - International Journal of Dental Hygiene

SN - 1601-5029

ER -