Ethnic invention: A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Is it a good idea for Rwanda, with its history of violence between Hutus and Tutsis, to stop classifying citizens by ethnicity in its census? Is it appropriate for Nigeria, with its history of ethnic violence, to have a two-party instead of a multiparty system? Is Iraq, with its conflicts between Shias, Sunnis and Kurds, better off with a proportional rather than a first-past-the-post electoral system? Is it appropriate for the United States, with its history of racial conflict between a white majority and an African American minority, to institutionalize majority-minority electoral districts? Should Sri Lanka, with its long-standing civil war between Sinhalas and Tamils, recreate itself as a federal state?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDesigning Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work
PublisherRussell Sage Foundation
Pages89-114
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9781610443500
ISBN (Print)9780871545183
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

invention
democracy
history
minority
electoral district
violence
multi-party system
Kurd
Rwanda
Tamil
electoral system
federal state
Sri Lanka
civil war
Iraq
Nigeria
census
ethnicity
citizen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Chandra, K. (2008). Ethnic invention: A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies. In Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work (pp. 89-114). Russell Sage Foundation.

Ethnic invention : A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies. / Chandra, Kanchan.

Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work. Russell Sage Foundation, 2008. p. 89-114.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Chandra, K 2008, Ethnic invention: A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies. in Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work. Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 89-114.
Chandra K. Ethnic invention: A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies. In Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work. Russell Sage Foundation. 2008. p. 89-114
Chandra, Kanchan. / Ethnic invention : A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies. Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work. Russell Sage Foundation, 2008. pp. 89-114
@inbook{935df3dc6f5547b8967999f8680d1b2e,
title = "Ethnic invention: A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies",
abstract = "Is it a good idea for Rwanda, with its history of violence between Hutus and Tutsis, to stop classifying citizens by ethnicity in its census? Is it appropriate for Nigeria, with its history of ethnic violence, to have a two-party instead of a multiparty system? Is Iraq, with its conflicts between Shias, Sunnis and Kurds, better off with a proportional rather than a first-past-the-post electoral system? Is it appropriate for the United States, with its history of racial conflict between a white majority and an African American minority, to institutionalize majority-minority electoral districts? Should Sri Lanka, with its long-standing civil war between Sinhalas and Tamils, recreate itself as a federal state?.",
author = "Kanchan Chandra",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780871545183",
pages = "89--114",
booktitle = "Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work",
publisher = "Russell Sage Foundation",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ethnic invention

T2 - A new principle for institutional design in ethnically divided democracies

AU - Chandra, Kanchan

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Is it a good idea for Rwanda, with its history of violence between Hutus and Tutsis, to stop classifying citizens by ethnicity in its census? Is it appropriate for Nigeria, with its history of ethnic violence, to have a two-party instead of a multiparty system? Is Iraq, with its conflicts between Shias, Sunnis and Kurds, better off with a proportional rather than a first-past-the-post electoral system? Is it appropriate for the United States, with its history of racial conflict between a white majority and an African American minority, to institutionalize majority-minority electoral districts? Should Sri Lanka, with its long-standing civil war between Sinhalas and Tamils, recreate itself as a federal state?.

AB - Is it a good idea for Rwanda, with its history of violence between Hutus and Tutsis, to stop classifying citizens by ethnicity in its census? Is it appropriate for Nigeria, with its history of ethnic violence, to have a two-party instead of a multiparty system? Is Iraq, with its conflicts between Shias, Sunnis and Kurds, better off with a proportional rather than a first-past-the-post electoral system? Is it appropriate for the United States, with its history of racial conflict between a white majority and an African American minority, to institutionalize majority-minority electoral districts? Should Sri Lanka, with its long-standing civil war between Sinhalas and Tamils, recreate itself as a federal state?.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73149125427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73149125427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:73149125427

SN - 9780871545183

SP - 89

EP - 114

BT - Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work

PB - Russell Sage Foundation

ER -