Ethnic disparities in educational attainment in China: Considering the implications of interethnic families

Emily Hannum, Hua Yu Sebastian Cherng, Meiyan Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of whether the classification of interethnic children, defined as those with one parent who is ethnic majority Han and one parent who is a member of an officially designated minority group, shapes observed patterns of educational advantage and disadvantage across official ethnic groups in China. Utilizing census data from 2000 and focusing on junior high school attainment as an outcome, we address three questions: among children classified as members of officially recognized minority groups, are interethnic children systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from non-interethnic children?; are interethnic children who are classified as minority systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from interethnic children who are classified as Han?; and, are observed patterns of educational stratification by ethnic group sensitive to the classification of interethnic children? Results show that interethnic children-whether classified as Han or minority-are generally educationally advantaged compared to their non-interethnic co-ethnics, and, in some cases, are faring comparably to or better than Han children. Moreover, the classification of interethnic children does make a difference for observed patterns of stratification. Interethnic childrens access advantage contributes to the observed advantage among historically advantaged groups and mitigates some of the disadvantages observed among historically disadvantaged groups. Better understanding of ethnic stratification in China will require additional information on the boundaries and porousness of ethnic categories. Future survey data collection efforts should consider adding questions about ethnic heritage, identity, and classification changes to the standard question about official ethnic classification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-23
Number of pages16
JournalEurasian Geography and Economics
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2015

Fingerprint

educational attainment
China
minority
minority group
stratification
ethnic group
parents
Group
family
Educational attainment
ethnic structure
census

Keywords

  • China
  • education
  • ethnicity
  • minorities
  • stratification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Ethnic disparities in educational attainment in China : Considering the implications of interethnic families. / Hannum, Emily; Cherng, Hua Yu Sebastian; Wang, Meiyan.

In: Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 56, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 8-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e5cb6d6bea78467b8482b399a28426a1,
title = "Ethnic disparities in educational attainment in China: Considering the implications of interethnic families",
abstract = "This paper addresses the question of whether the classification of interethnic children, defined as those with one parent who is ethnic majority Han and one parent who is a member of an officially designated minority group, shapes observed patterns of educational advantage and disadvantage across official ethnic groups in China. Utilizing census data from 2000 and focusing on junior high school attainment as an outcome, we address three questions: among children classified as members of officially recognized minority groups, are interethnic children systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from non-interethnic children?; are interethnic children who are classified as minority systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from interethnic children who are classified as Han?; and, are observed patterns of educational stratification by ethnic group sensitive to the classification of interethnic children? Results show that interethnic children-whether classified as Han or minority-are generally educationally advantaged compared to their non-interethnic co-ethnics, and, in some cases, are faring comparably to or better than Han children. Moreover, the classification of interethnic children does make a difference for observed patterns of stratification. Interethnic childrens access advantage contributes to the observed advantage among historically advantaged groups and mitigates some of the disadvantages observed among historically disadvantaged groups. Better understanding of ethnic stratification in China will require additional information on the boundaries and porousness of ethnic categories. Future survey data collection efforts should consider adding questions about ethnic heritage, identity, and classification changes to the standard question about official ethnic classification.",
keywords = "China, education, ethnicity, minorities, stratification",
author = "Emily Hannum and Cherng, {Hua Yu Sebastian} and Meiyan Wang",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15387216.2015.1056745",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "8--23",
journal = "Eurasian Geography and Economics",
issn = "1538-7216",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnic disparities in educational attainment in China

T2 - Considering the implications of interethnic families

AU - Hannum, Emily

AU - Cherng, Hua Yu Sebastian

AU - Wang, Meiyan

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - This paper addresses the question of whether the classification of interethnic children, defined as those with one parent who is ethnic majority Han and one parent who is a member of an officially designated minority group, shapes observed patterns of educational advantage and disadvantage across official ethnic groups in China. Utilizing census data from 2000 and focusing on junior high school attainment as an outcome, we address three questions: among children classified as members of officially recognized minority groups, are interethnic children systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from non-interethnic children?; are interethnic children who are classified as minority systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from interethnic children who are classified as Han?; and, are observed patterns of educational stratification by ethnic group sensitive to the classification of interethnic children? Results show that interethnic children-whether classified as Han or minority-are generally educationally advantaged compared to their non-interethnic co-ethnics, and, in some cases, are faring comparably to or better than Han children. Moreover, the classification of interethnic children does make a difference for observed patterns of stratification. Interethnic childrens access advantage contributes to the observed advantage among historically advantaged groups and mitigates some of the disadvantages observed among historically disadvantaged groups. Better understanding of ethnic stratification in China will require additional information on the boundaries and porousness of ethnic categories. Future survey data collection efforts should consider adding questions about ethnic heritage, identity, and classification changes to the standard question about official ethnic classification.

AB - This paper addresses the question of whether the classification of interethnic children, defined as those with one parent who is ethnic majority Han and one parent who is a member of an officially designated minority group, shapes observed patterns of educational advantage and disadvantage across official ethnic groups in China. Utilizing census data from 2000 and focusing on junior high school attainment as an outcome, we address three questions: among children classified as members of officially recognized minority groups, are interethnic children systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from non-interethnic children?; are interethnic children who are classified as minority systematically different in terms of educational outcomes from interethnic children who are classified as Han?; and, are observed patterns of educational stratification by ethnic group sensitive to the classification of interethnic children? Results show that interethnic children-whether classified as Han or minority-are generally educationally advantaged compared to their non-interethnic co-ethnics, and, in some cases, are faring comparably to or better than Han children. Moreover, the classification of interethnic children does make a difference for observed patterns of stratification. Interethnic childrens access advantage contributes to the observed advantage among historically advantaged groups and mitigates some of the disadvantages observed among historically disadvantaged groups. Better understanding of ethnic stratification in China will require additional information on the boundaries and porousness of ethnic categories. Future survey data collection efforts should consider adding questions about ethnic heritage, identity, and classification changes to the standard question about official ethnic classification.

KW - China

KW - education

KW - ethnicity

KW - minorities

KW - stratification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938214864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938214864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15387216.2015.1056745

DO - 10.1080/15387216.2015.1056745

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938214864

VL - 56

SP - 8

EP - 23

JO - Eurasian Geography and Economics

JF - Eurasian Geography and Economics

SN - 1538-7216

IS - 1

ER -