Ethical dilemmas in choosing a healthful diet: Vote with your fork!

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dietary guidelines for health promotion and disease prevention in the USA recommend a consumption pattern based largely on grains, fruit and vegetables, with smaller amounts of meat and dairy foods, and even smaller amounts of foods high in fat and sugar. Such diets are demonstrably health promoting, but following them raises ethical issues related to the role of nutritionists in advising the public about healthful dietary choices, as well as to the role of the food industry in food production and marketing. In the USA a shift towards a more plant-based diet would affect the economic interests of producers of food commodities, food products and meals prepared outside the home; it would also affect the environment, food prices, trade with other countries (developing as well as industrialized) and relationships among the food industry, government agencies (domestic and international) and food and nutrition professionals. In a free-market economy any dietary choice has consequences for food producers. Thus, considerations of ethical dilemmas in choosing healthful diets suggest that food choices are political acts that offer opportunities for all parties concerned to examine the consequences of such choices and 'vote with forks'.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-629
Number of pages11
JournalProceedings of the Nutrition Society
Volume59
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

food industry
food choices
Diet
Food
health promotion
nutritionists
diet
food marketing
plant-based diet
high fat foods
market economy
commodity foods
Dietary Guidelines
food prices
government agencies
disease prevention
meals (menu)
Food Industry
food production
dairy products

Keywords

  • Dietary guidelines
  • Food choice
  • Food industry
  • Food politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Food Science

Cite this

Ethical dilemmas in choosing a healthful diet : Vote with your fork! / Nestle, M.

In: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2000, p. 619-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8fa795f7f3894be898c68eb047f60c11,
title = "Ethical dilemmas in choosing a healthful diet: Vote with your fork!",
abstract = "Dietary guidelines for health promotion and disease prevention in the USA recommend a consumption pattern based largely on grains, fruit and vegetables, with smaller amounts of meat and dairy foods, and even smaller amounts of foods high in fat and sugar. Such diets are demonstrably health promoting, but following them raises ethical issues related to the role of nutritionists in advising the public about healthful dietary choices, as well as to the role of the food industry in food production and marketing. In the USA a shift towards a more plant-based diet would affect the economic interests of producers of food commodities, food products and meals prepared outside the home; it would also affect the environment, food prices, trade with other countries (developing as well as industrialized) and relationships among the food industry, government agencies (domestic and international) and food and nutrition professionals. In a free-market economy any dietary choice has consequences for food producers. Thus, considerations of ethical dilemmas in choosing healthful diets suggest that food choices are political acts that offer opportunities for all parties concerned to examine the consequences of such choices and 'vote with forks'.",
keywords = "Dietary guidelines, Food choice, Food industry, Food politics",
author = "M. Nestle",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "619--629",
journal = "Proceedings of the Nutrition Society",
issn = "0029-6651",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical dilemmas in choosing a healthful diet

T2 - Vote with your fork!

AU - Nestle, M.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Dietary guidelines for health promotion and disease prevention in the USA recommend a consumption pattern based largely on grains, fruit and vegetables, with smaller amounts of meat and dairy foods, and even smaller amounts of foods high in fat and sugar. Such diets are demonstrably health promoting, but following them raises ethical issues related to the role of nutritionists in advising the public about healthful dietary choices, as well as to the role of the food industry in food production and marketing. In the USA a shift towards a more plant-based diet would affect the economic interests of producers of food commodities, food products and meals prepared outside the home; it would also affect the environment, food prices, trade with other countries (developing as well as industrialized) and relationships among the food industry, government agencies (domestic and international) and food and nutrition professionals. In a free-market economy any dietary choice has consequences for food producers. Thus, considerations of ethical dilemmas in choosing healthful diets suggest that food choices are political acts that offer opportunities for all parties concerned to examine the consequences of such choices and 'vote with forks'.

AB - Dietary guidelines for health promotion and disease prevention in the USA recommend a consumption pattern based largely on grains, fruit and vegetables, with smaller amounts of meat and dairy foods, and even smaller amounts of foods high in fat and sugar. Such diets are demonstrably health promoting, but following them raises ethical issues related to the role of nutritionists in advising the public about healthful dietary choices, as well as to the role of the food industry in food production and marketing. In the USA a shift towards a more plant-based diet would affect the economic interests of producers of food commodities, food products and meals prepared outside the home; it would also affect the environment, food prices, trade with other countries (developing as well as industrialized) and relationships among the food industry, government agencies (domestic and international) and food and nutrition professionals. In a free-market economy any dietary choice has consequences for food producers. Thus, considerations of ethical dilemmas in choosing healthful diets suggest that food choices are political acts that offer opportunities for all parties concerned to examine the consequences of such choices and 'vote with forks'.

KW - Dietary guidelines

KW - Food choice

KW - Food industry

KW - Food politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034530156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034530156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 619

EP - 629

JO - Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

JF - Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

SN - 0029-6651

IS - 4

ER -