Estimation of synaptic conductances

Antoni Guillamon, David W. McLaughlin, John Rinzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In order to identify and understand mechanistically the cortical circuitry of sensory information processing estimates are needed of synaptic input fields that drive neurons. From intracellular in vivo recordings one would like to estimate net synaptic conductance time courses for excitation and inhibition, gE(t) and gI(t), during time-varying stimulus presentations. However, the intrinsic conductance transients associated with neuronal spiking can confound such estimates, and thereby jeopardize functional interpretations. Here, using a conductance-based pyramidal neuron model we illustrate errors in estimates when the influence of spike-generating conductances are not reduced or avoided. A typical estimation procedure involves approximating the current-voltage relation at each time point during repeated stimuli. The repeated presentations are done in a few sets, each with a different steady bias current. From the trial-averaged smoothed membrane potential one estimates total membrane conductance and then dissects out estimates for gE(t) and gI(t). Simulations show that estimates obtained during phases without spikes are good but those obtained from phases with spiking should be viewed with skeptism. For the simulations, we consider two different synaptic input scenarios, each corresponding to computational network models of orientation tuning in visual cortex. One input scenario mimics a push-pull arrangement for gE(t) and gI(t) and idealized as specified smooth time courses. The other is taken directly from a large-scale network simulation of stochastically spiking neurons in a slab of cortex with recurrent excitation and inhibition. For both, we show that spike-generating conductances cause serious errors in the estimates of gE and gI. In some phases for the push-pull examples even the polarity of gI is mis-estimated, indicating significant increase when gI is actually decreased. Our primary message is to be cautious about forming interpretations based on estimates developed during spiking phases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-42
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Physiology Paris
Volume100
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Neurons
Pyramidal Cells
Visual Cortex
Automatic Data Processing
Membrane Potentials
Membranes

Keywords

  • Conductance-based models
  • Estimation of conductances
  • Primary visual cortex
  • Spiking neurons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology (medical)
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Estimation of synaptic conductances. / Guillamon, Antoni; McLaughlin, David W.; Rinzel, John.

In: Journal of Physiology Paris, Vol. 100, No. 1-3, 07.2006, p. 31-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5dadced481c348b584a0ea5a5aef621d,
title = "Estimation of synaptic conductances",
abstract = "In order to identify and understand mechanistically the cortical circuitry of sensory information processing estimates are needed of synaptic input fields that drive neurons. From intracellular in vivo recordings one would like to estimate net synaptic conductance time courses for excitation and inhibition, gE(t) and gI(t), during time-varying stimulus presentations. However, the intrinsic conductance transients associated with neuronal spiking can confound such estimates, and thereby jeopardize functional interpretations. Here, using a conductance-based pyramidal neuron model we illustrate errors in estimates when the influence of spike-generating conductances are not reduced or avoided. A typical estimation procedure involves approximating the current-voltage relation at each time point during repeated stimuli. The repeated presentations are done in a few sets, each with a different steady bias current. From the trial-averaged smoothed membrane potential one estimates total membrane conductance and then dissects out estimates for gE(t) and gI(t). Simulations show that estimates obtained during phases without spikes are good but those obtained from phases with spiking should be viewed with skeptism. For the simulations, we consider two different synaptic input scenarios, each corresponding to computational network models of orientation tuning in visual cortex. One input scenario mimics a push-pull arrangement for gE(t) and gI(t) and idealized as specified smooth time courses. The other is taken directly from a large-scale network simulation of stochastically spiking neurons in a slab of cortex with recurrent excitation and inhibition. For both, we show that spike-generating conductances cause serious errors in the estimates of gE and gI. In some phases for the push-pull examples even the polarity of gI is mis-estimated, indicating significant increase when gI is actually decreased. Our primary message is to be cautious about forming interpretations based on estimates developed during spiking phases.",
keywords = "Conductance-based models, Estimation of conductances, Primary visual cortex, Spiking neurons",
author = "Antoni Guillamon and McLaughlin, {David W.} and John Rinzel",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "31--42",
journal = "Journal de Physiologie",
issn = "0928-4257",
publisher = "Elsevier Masson SAS",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of synaptic conductances

AU - Guillamon, Antoni

AU - McLaughlin, David W.

AU - Rinzel, John

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - In order to identify and understand mechanistically the cortical circuitry of sensory information processing estimates are needed of synaptic input fields that drive neurons. From intracellular in vivo recordings one would like to estimate net synaptic conductance time courses for excitation and inhibition, gE(t) and gI(t), during time-varying stimulus presentations. However, the intrinsic conductance transients associated with neuronal spiking can confound such estimates, and thereby jeopardize functional interpretations. Here, using a conductance-based pyramidal neuron model we illustrate errors in estimates when the influence of spike-generating conductances are not reduced or avoided. A typical estimation procedure involves approximating the current-voltage relation at each time point during repeated stimuli. The repeated presentations are done in a few sets, each with a different steady bias current. From the trial-averaged smoothed membrane potential one estimates total membrane conductance and then dissects out estimates for gE(t) and gI(t). Simulations show that estimates obtained during phases without spikes are good but those obtained from phases with spiking should be viewed with skeptism. For the simulations, we consider two different synaptic input scenarios, each corresponding to computational network models of orientation tuning in visual cortex. One input scenario mimics a push-pull arrangement for gE(t) and gI(t) and idealized as specified smooth time courses. The other is taken directly from a large-scale network simulation of stochastically spiking neurons in a slab of cortex with recurrent excitation and inhibition. For both, we show that spike-generating conductances cause serious errors in the estimates of gE and gI. In some phases for the push-pull examples even the polarity of gI is mis-estimated, indicating significant increase when gI is actually decreased. Our primary message is to be cautious about forming interpretations based on estimates developed during spiking phases.

AB - In order to identify and understand mechanistically the cortical circuitry of sensory information processing estimates are needed of synaptic input fields that drive neurons. From intracellular in vivo recordings one would like to estimate net synaptic conductance time courses for excitation and inhibition, gE(t) and gI(t), during time-varying stimulus presentations. However, the intrinsic conductance transients associated with neuronal spiking can confound such estimates, and thereby jeopardize functional interpretations. Here, using a conductance-based pyramidal neuron model we illustrate errors in estimates when the influence of spike-generating conductances are not reduced or avoided. A typical estimation procedure involves approximating the current-voltage relation at each time point during repeated stimuli. The repeated presentations are done in a few sets, each with a different steady bias current. From the trial-averaged smoothed membrane potential one estimates total membrane conductance and then dissects out estimates for gE(t) and gI(t). Simulations show that estimates obtained during phases without spikes are good but those obtained from phases with spiking should be viewed with skeptism. For the simulations, we consider two different synaptic input scenarios, each corresponding to computational network models of orientation tuning in visual cortex. One input scenario mimics a push-pull arrangement for gE(t) and gI(t) and idealized as specified smooth time courses. The other is taken directly from a large-scale network simulation of stochastically spiking neurons in a slab of cortex with recurrent excitation and inhibition. For both, we show that spike-generating conductances cause serious errors in the estimates of gE and gI. In some phases for the push-pull examples even the polarity of gI is mis-estimated, indicating significant increase when gI is actually decreased. Our primary message is to be cautious about forming interpretations based on estimates developed during spiking phases.

KW - Conductance-based models

KW - Estimation of conductances

KW - Primary visual cortex

KW - Spiking neurons

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849186763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849186763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.010

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 31

EP - 42

JO - Journal de Physiologie

JF - Journal de Physiologie

SN - 0928-4257

IS - 1-3

ER -