Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis

Kenneth Benoit, Michael Laver

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In this paper we compare estimates of the left-right positions of political parties derived from an expert survey recently completed by the authors with those derived by the Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) from the content analysis of party manifestos. Having briefly described the expert survey, we first explore the substantive policy content of left and right in the expert survey estimates. We then compare the expert survey to the CMP method on methodological grounds. Third, we directly compare the expert survey results to the CMP results for the most recent time period available, revealing some agreement but also numerous inconsistencies in both cross-national and within-country party placements. We conclude by investigating the CMP scores in more detail, focusing on the series of British left-right placements and the components of these scores.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)90-107
    Number of pages18
    JournalElectoral Studies
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 2007

    Fingerprint

    expert survey
    content analysis

    Keywords

    • Comparative manifestos project
    • Content analysis
    • Expert survey
    • Left-right
    • Political parties

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Estimating party policy positions : Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. / Benoit, Kenneth; Laver, Michael.

    In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 90-107.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Benoit, Kenneth ; Laver, Michael. / Estimating party policy positions : Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. In: Electoral Studies. 2007 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 90-107.
    @article{7dfd4585a43f43ab8bb6c452e15d1c6d,
    title = "Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis",
    abstract = "In this paper we compare estimates of the left-right positions of political parties derived from an expert survey recently completed by the authors with those derived by the Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) from the content analysis of party manifestos. Having briefly described the expert survey, we first explore the substantive policy content of left and right in the expert survey estimates. We then compare the expert survey to the CMP method on methodological grounds. Third, we directly compare the expert survey results to the CMP results for the most recent time period available, revealing some agreement but also numerous inconsistencies in both cross-national and within-country party placements. We conclude by investigating the CMP scores in more detail, focusing on the series of British left-right placements and the components of these scores.",
    keywords = "Comparative manifestos project, Content analysis, Expert survey, Left-right, Political parties",
    author = "Kenneth Benoit and Michael Laver",
    year = "2007",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.008",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "90--107",
    journal = "Electoral Studies",
    issn = "0261-3794",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Estimating party policy positions

    T2 - Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis

    AU - Benoit, Kenneth

    AU - Laver, Michael

    PY - 2007/3

    Y1 - 2007/3

    N2 - In this paper we compare estimates of the left-right positions of political parties derived from an expert survey recently completed by the authors with those derived by the Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) from the content analysis of party manifestos. Having briefly described the expert survey, we first explore the substantive policy content of left and right in the expert survey estimates. We then compare the expert survey to the CMP method on methodological grounds. Third, we directly compare the expert survey results to the CMP results for the most recent time period available, revealing some agreement but also numerous inconsistencies in both cross-national and within-country party placements. We conclude by investigating the CMP scores in more detail, focusing on the series of British left-right placements and the components of these scores.

    AB - In this paper we compare estimates of the left-right positions of political parties derived from an expert survey recently completed by the authors with those derived by the Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) from the content analysis of party manifestos. Having briefly described the expert survey, we first explore the substantive policy content of left and right in the expert survey estimates. We then compare the expert survey to the CMP method on methodological grounds. Third, we directly compare the expert survey results to the CMP results for the most recent time period available, revealing some agreement but also numerous inconsistencies in both cross-national and within-country party placements. We conclude by investigating the CMP scores in more detail, focusing on the series of British left-right placements and the components of these scores.

    KW - Comparative manifestos project

    KW - Content analysis

    KW - Expert survey

    KW - Left-right

    KW - Political parties

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846783964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846783964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.008

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:33846783964

    VL - 26

    SP - 90

    EP - 107

    JO - Electoral Studies

    JF - Electoral Studies

    SN - 0261-3794

    IS - 1

    ER -