Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The construct of science achievement - what K-12 students should know and be able to do in science - is central to science education reform. This paper analyzes current conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents, and considers equity implications for science achievement and assessment in the context of standards-based and systemic reform. The paper reviews documents on science content standards (NSES and Project 2061), performance standards (New Standards), and large-scale assessment frameworks (1996 NAEP and TIMSS). Although the documents emphasize equity as the key principle, they present the assimilationist perspective by defining science and science achievement in terms of the Western science tradition with little consideration of alternative views of science and ways of knowing from diverse backgrounds. Based on the conception of equity in terms of social justice, the paper proposes the cultural anthropological perspective to develop a more inclusive and broader view of science achievement and assessment for diverse students.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-115
Number of pages33
JournalReview of Educational Research
Volume69
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

equity
reform
science
performance standard
social justice
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. / Okhee, Lee.

In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1999, p. 83-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4cc3f7ecab57404d938e24616dbbfa93,
title = "Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents",
abstract = "The construct of science achievement - what K-12 students should know and be able to do in science - is central to science education reform. This paper analyzes current conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents, and considers equity implications for science achievement and assessment in the context of standards-based and systemic reform. The paper reviews documents on science content standards (NSES and Project 2061), performance standards (New Standards), and large-scale assessment frameworks (1996 NAEP and TIMSS). Although the documents emphasize equity as the key principle, they present the assimilationist perspective by defining science and science achievement in terms of the Western science tradition with little consideration of alternative views of science and ways of knowing from diverse backgrounds. Based on the conception of equity in terms of social justice, the paper proposes the cultural anthropological perspective to develop a more inclusive and broader view of science achievement and assessment for diverse students.",
author = "Lee Okhee",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "83--115",
journal = "Review of Educational Research",
issn = "0034-6543",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents

AU - Okhee, Lee

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - The construct of science achievement - what K-12 students should know and be able to do in science - is central to science education reform. This paper analyzes current conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents, and considers equity implications for science achievement and assessment in the context of standards-based and systemic reform. The paper reviews documents on science content standards (NSES and Project 2061), performance standards (New Standards), and large-scale assessment frameworks (1996 NAEP and TIMSS). Although the documents emphasize equity as the key principle, they present the assimilationist perspective by defining science and science achievement in terms of the Western science tradition with little consideration of alternative views of science and ways of knowing from diverse backgrounds. Based on the conception of equity in terms of social justice, the paper proposes the cultural anthropological perspective to develop a more inclusive and broader view of science achievement and assessment for diverse students.

AB - The construct of science achievement - what K-12 students should know and be able to do in science - is central to science education reform. This paper analyzes current conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents, and considers equity implications for science achievement and assessment in the context of standards-based and systemic reform. The paper reviews documents on science content standards (NSES and Project 2061), performance standards (New Standards), and large-scale assessment frameworks (1996 NAEP and TIMSS). Although the documents emphasize equity as the key principle, they present the assimilationist perspective by defining science and science achievement in terms of the Western science tradition with little consideration of alternative views of science and ways of knowing from diverse backgrounds. Based on the conception of equity in terms of social justice, the paper proposes the cultural anthropological perspective to develop a more inclusive and broader view of science achievement and assessment for diverse students.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033238833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033238833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033238833

VL - 69

SP - 83

EP - 115

JO - Review of Educational Research

JF - Review of Educational Research

SN - 0034-6543

IS - 1

ER -