Energy and reserve co-optimisation - Reserve availability, lost opportunity and uplift compensation cost

Ivan Pavic, Yury Dvorkin, Hrvoje Pandžic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ancillary services used for active power balancing are called balancing services or operating reserves and their provision is vital for maintaining power system frequency at the nominal value. In a deregulated environment, where generation is unbundled from transmission and distribution operations, independently owned generating companies may elect to provide operating reserves. However, it is not easy to calculate the exact cost of reserve provision and, therefore, bid for it accurately. Although the cost efficiency of reserve provision can be improved by co-optimising energy and reserve markets, generating companies can still encounter monetary losses caused by the provision of reserve. Currently, these losses are compensated based on ex-post calculations. Hence, current energy and reserve prices do not adequately factor in the ex-post compensation caused by reserve provision. This study proposes an energy and reserve co-optimisation with an explicit consideration of two compensation mechanisms, i.e. lost opportunity and uplift payments. The problem is structured as a bilevel model. The upper level is a mixed-integer unit commitment problem and the lower level is a continuous economic dispatch problem. The case study shows that the proposed model increases market efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-237
Number of pages9
JournalIET Generation, Transmission and Distribution
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 22 2019

Fingerprint

Availability
Costs
Industry
Economics
Compensation and Redress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Energy and reserve co-optimisation - Reserve availability, lost opportunity and uplift compensation cost. / Pavic, Ivan; Dvorkin, Yury; Pandžic, Hrvoje.

In: IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 13, No. 2, 22.01.2019, p. 229-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e38bbcb2d244c42be38a5ba5ff2312a,
title = "Energy and reserve co-optimisation - Reserve availability, lost opportunity and uplift compensation cost",
abstract = "Ancillary services used for active power balancing are called balancing services or operating reserves and their provision is vital for maintaining power system frequency at the nominal value. In a deregulated environment, where generation is unbundled from transmission and distribution operations, independently owned generating companies may elect to provide operating reserves. However, it is not easy to calculate the exact cost of reserve provision and, therefore, bid for it accurately. Although the cost efficiency of reserve provision can be improved by co-optimising energy and reserve markets, generating companies can still encounter monetary losses caused by the provision of reserve. Currently, these losses are compensated based on ex-post calculations. Hence, current energy and reserve prices do not adequately factor in the ex-post compensation caused by reserve provision. This study proposes an energy and reserve co-optimisation with an explicit consideration of two compensation mechanisms, i.e. lost opportunity and uplift payments. The problem is structured as a bilevel model. The upper level is a mixed-integer unit commitment problem and the lower level is a continuous economic dispatch problem. The case study shows that the proposed model increases market efficiency.",
author = "Ivan Pavic and Yury Dvorkin and Hrvoje Pandžic",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5480",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "229--237",
journal = "IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution",
issn = "1751-8687",
publisher = "Institution of Engineering and Technology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy and reserve co-optimisation - Reserve availability, lost opportunity and uplift compensation cost

AU - Pavic, Ivan

AU - Dvorkin, Yury

AU - Pandžic, Hrvoje

PY - 2019/1/22

Y1 - 2019/1/22

N2 - Ancillary services used for active power balancing are called balancing services or operating reserves and their provision is vital for maintaining power system frequency at the nominal value. In a deregulated environment, where generation is unbundled from transmission and distribution operations, independently owned generating companies may elect to provide operating reserves. However, it is not easy to calculate the exact cost of reserve provision and, therefore, bid for it accurately. Although the cost efficiency of reserve provision can be improved by co-optimising energy and reserve markets, generating companies can still encounter monetary losses caused by the provision of reserve. Currently, these losses are compensated based on ex-post calculations. Hence, current energy and reserve prices do not adequately factor in the ex-post compensation caused by reserve provision. This study proposes an energy and reserve co-optimisation with an explicit consideration of two compensation mechanisms, i.e. lost opportunity and uplift payments. The problem is structured as a bilevel model. The upper level is a mixed-integer unit commitment problem and the lower level is a continuous economic dispatch problem. The case study shows that the proposed model increases market efficiency.

AB - Ancillary services used for active power balancing are called balancing services or operating reserves and their provision is vital for maintaining power system frequency at the nominal value. In a deregulated environment, where generation is unbundled from transmission and distribution operations, independently owned generating companies may elect to provide operating reserves. However, it is not easy to calculate the exact cost of reserve provision and, therefore, bid for it accurately. Although the cost efficiency of reserve provision can be improved by co-optimising energy and reserve markets, generating companies can still encounter monetary losses caused by the provision of reserve. Currently, these losses are compensated based on ex-post calculations. Hence, current energy and reserve prices do not adequately factor in the ex-post compensation caused by reserve provision. This study proposes an energy and reserve co-optimisation with an explicit consideration of two compensation mechanisms, i.e. lost opportunity and uplift payments. The problem is structured as a bilevel model. The upper level is a mixed-integer unit commitment problem and the lower level is a continuous economic dispatch problem. The case study shows that the proposed model increases market efficiency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060108477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060108477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5480

DO - 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5480

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 229

EP - 237

JO - IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution

JF - IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution

SN - 1751-8687

IS - 2

ER -