End-of-Life Care Preference: Examination of Chinese Adults with Children and Those Who Lost Their Only Child

Yan Liang, Hong Liang Cui, Jing Wang, Hanzhang Xu, Bei Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling adults in Mainland China. This study investigated the EOL care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling Chinese adults in Shanghai, China.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shanghai, China, from April to June in 2013. A total of 1200 older adults aged 60 years and older and another 200 middle-aged and older adults aged 45 years and older who lost their only child were included in the current study. In the current study, the EOL care preference included three categories: preferred family care, preferred care provided by visiting healthcare professionals, and preferred care in a specialized EOL care institute. Childlessness was coded as lost the only child, had children but not coresiding, and had coresiding children. Mor and Hiris's model of choices of setting at the EOL was used to explore the EOL care preference and its associated factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, support networks, functional characteristics, and healthcare system. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to estimate the factors associated with their EOL care preference.

Results: In terms of EOL care preference, adults who lost their only child preferred care provided by a specialized EOL care institute (58.43%), while adults who had children preferred family care at home (46.72% for adults who did not coreside with children and 49.04% for those who did). Results from multinomial logistic regressions showed that adults with higher income, having properties, and having children tended to opt for family care at home. Participants with friends' support preferred EOL care provided by visiting healthcare professionals or specialized EOL care institutions over family care at home.

Conclusions: Income, wealth, having children, and having friends' support were significant factors that were associated with the EOL care preference among Chinese adults. Home-based EOL care, professional and individualized hospice, or palliative care provided by institutions need to be developed in China.
Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume0
Issue number0
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 17 2018

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Only Child
China
Home Care Services
Independent Living
Delivery of Health Care
Logistic Models
Hospice Care
Child Care
Palliative Care
Cross-Sectional Studies

Cite this

End-of-Life Care Preference: Examination of Chinese Adults with Children and Those Who Lost Their Only Child. / Liang, Yan ; Cui, Hong Liang; Wang, Jing; Xu, Hanzhang; Wu, Bei.

In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 0, No. 0, 17.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35733bf18d7b4a0f881e88929cdb55f2,
title = "End-of-Life Care Preference: Examination of Chinese Adults with Children and Those Who Lost Their Only Child",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling adults in Mainland China. This study investigated the EOL care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling Chinese adults in Shanghai, China.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shanghai, China, from April to June in 2013. A total of 1200 older adults aged 60 years and older and another 200 middle-aged and older adults aged 45 years and older who lost their only child were included in the current study. In the current study, the EOL care preference included three categories: preferred family care, preferred care provided by visiting healthcare professionals, and preferred care in a specialized EOL care institute. Childlessness was coded as lost the only child, had children but not coresiding, and had coresiding children. Mor and Hiris's model of choices of setting at the EOL was used to explore the EOL care preference and its associated factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, support networks, functional characteristics, and healthcare system. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to estimate the factors associated with their EOL care preference.Results: In terms of EOL care preference, adults who lost their only child preferred care provided by a specialized EOL care institute (58.43{\%}), while adults who had children preferred family care at home (46.72{\%} for adults who did not coreside with children and 49.04{\%} for those who did). Results from multinomial logistic regressions showed that adults with higher income, having properties, and having children tended to opt for family care at home. Participants with friends' support preferred EOL care provided by visiting healthcare professionals or specialized EOL care institutions over family care at home.Conclusions: Income, wealth, having children, and having friends' support were significant factors that were associated with the EOL care preference among Chinese adults. Home-based EOL care, professional and individualized hospice, or palliative care provided by institutions need to be developed in China.",
author = "Yan Liang and Cui, {Hong Liang} and Jing Wang and Hanzhang Xu and Bei Wu",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "17",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "0",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "0",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - End-of-Life Care Preference: Examination of Chinese Adults with Children and Those Who Lost Their Only Child

AU - Liang, Yan

AU - Cui, Hong Liang

AU - Wang, Jing

AU - Xu, Hanzhang

AU - Wu, Bei

PY - 2018/7/17

Y1 - 2018/7/17

N2 - Background: Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling adults in Mainland China. This study investigated the EOL care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling Chinese adults in Shanghai, China.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shanghai, China, from April to June in 2013. A total of 1200 older adults aged 60 years and older and another 200 middle-aged and older adults aged 45 years and older who lost their only child were included in the current study. In the current study, the EOL care preference included three categories: preferred family care, preferred care provided by visiting healthcare professionals, and preferred care in a specialized EOL care institute. Childlessness was coded as lost the only child, had children but not coresiding, and had coresiding children. Mor and Hiris's model of choices of setting at the EOL was used to explore the EOL care preference and its associated factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, support networks, functional characteristics, and healthcare system. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to estimate the factors associated with their EOL care preference.Results: In terms of EOL care preference, adults who lost their only child preferred care provided by a specialized EOL care institute (58.43%), while adults who had children preferred family care at home (46.72% for adults who did not coreside with children and 49.04% for those who did). Results from multinomial logistic regressions showed that adults with higher income, having properties, and having children tended to opt for family care at home. Participants with friends' support preferred EOL care provided by visiting healthcare professionals or specialized EOL care institutions over family care at home.Conclusions: Income, wealth, having children, and having friends' support were significant factors that were associated with the EOL care preference among Chinese adults. Home-based EOL care, professional and individualized hospice, or palliative care provided by institutions need to be developed in China.

AB - Background: Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling adults in Mainland China. This study investigated the EOL care preference and its associated factors among community-dwelling Chinese adults in Shanghai, China.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shanghai, China, from April to June in 2013. A total of 1200 older adults aged 60 years and older and another 200 middle-aged and older adults aged 45 years and older who lost their only child were included in the current study. In the current study, the EOL care preference included three categories: preferred family care, preferred care provided by visiting healthcare professionals, and preferred care in a specialized EOL care institute. Childlessness was coded as lost the only child, had children but not coresiding, and had coresiding children. Mor and Hiris's model of choices of setting at the EOL was used to explore the EOL care preference and its associated factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, support networks, functional characteristics, and healthcare system. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to estimate the factors associated with their EOL care preference.Results: In terms of EOL care preference, adults who lost their only child preferred care provided by a specialized EOL care institute (58.43%), while adults who had children preferred family care at home (46.72% for adults who did not coreside with children and 49.04% for those who did). Results from multinomial logistic regressions showed that adults with higher income, having properties, and having children tended to opt for family care at home. Participants with friends' support preferred EOL care provided by visiting healthcare professionals or specialized EOL care institutions over family care at home.Conclusions: Income, wealth, having children, and having friends' support were significant factors that were associated with the EOL care preference among Chinese adults. Home-based EOL care, professional and individualized hospice, or palliative care provided by institutions need to be developed in China.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0043

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0043

DO - https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0043

M3 - Article

VL - 0

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 0

ER -