Emplacement and Displacement

Perceiving the Landscape Through Aboriginal Australian Acrylic Painting

Fred Myers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Aboriginal Australian acrylic paintings have long been considered representations of mythologically invested landscape. This understanding has been made problematic by recent writings on 'dwelling'. As common usage of the term 'landscape' seems to prioritize vision, to suggest that the acrylic paintings are landscapes only strengthens the suspicion that they are artifacts of displacement or distancing, rather than examples of the emplacement emphasized in this 'dwelling perspective'. However, this paper will demonstrate that the relationship between acrylic painting and the land is more complex than such an interpretation. It will argue that the Aboriginal objectification of their relationship to the land is not inherently a distancing of the land.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)435-463
    Number of pages29
    JournalEthnos
    Volume78
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    objectification
    artifact
    interpretation
    Acrylic Paintings
    Aboriginal Australians
    Distancing
    Dwelling
    Objectification
    Landscape Terms
    Artifact
    Suspicion

    Keywords

    • Aboriginal Australian painting
    • dwelling
    • emplacement
    • Landscape theory
    • representation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    Emplacement and Displacement : Perceiving the Landscape Through Aboriginal Australian Acrylic Painting. / Myers, Fred.

    In: Ethnos, Vol. 78, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 435-463.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{8a6e427393c54ab0bf5fb6d380c5c07c,
    title = "Emplacement and Displacement: Perceiving the Landscape Through Aboriginal Australian Acrylic Painting",
    abstract = "Aboriginal Australian acrylic paintings have long been considered representations of mythologically invested landscape. This understanding has been made problematic by recent writings on 'dwelling'. As common usage of the term 'landscape' seems to prioritize vision, to suggest that the acrylic paintings are landscapes only strengthens the suspicion that they are artifacts of displacement or distancing, rather than examples of the emplacement emphasized in this 'dwelling perspective'. However, this paper will demonstrate that the relationship between acrylic painting and the land is more complex than such an interpretation. It will argue that the Aboriginal objectification of their relationship to the land is not inherently a distancing of the land.",
    keywords = "Aboriginal Australian painting, dwelling, emplacement, Landscape theory, representation",
    author = "Fred Myers",
    year = "2013",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1080/00141844.2012.726635",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "78",
    pages = "435--463",
    journal = "Ethnos",
    issn = "0014-1844",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Emplacement and Displacement

    T2 - Perceiving the Landscape Through Aboriginal Australian Acrylic Painting

    AU - Myers, Fred

    PY - 2013/12

    Y1 - 2013/12

    N2 - Aboriginal Australian acrylic paintings have long been considered representations of mythologically invested landscape. This understanding has been made problematic by recent writings on 'dwelling'. As common usage of the term 'landscape' seems to prioritize vision, to suggest that the acrylic paintings are landscapes only strengthens the suspicion that they are artifacts of displacement or distancing, rather than examples of the emplacement emphasized in this 'dwelling perspective'. However, this paper will demonstrate that the relationship between acrylic painting and the land is more complex than such an interpretation. It will argue that the Aboriginal objectification of their relationship to the land is not inherently a distancing of the land.

    AB - Aboriginal Australian acrylic paintings have long been considered representations of mythologically invested landscape. This understanding has been made problematic by recent writings on 'dwelling'. As common usage of the term 'landscape' seems to prioritize vision, to suggest that the acrylic paintings are landscapes only strengthens the suspicion that they are artifacts of displacement or distancing, rather than examples of the emplacement emphasized in this 'dwelling perspective'. However, this paper will demonstrate that the relationship between acrylic painting and the land is more complex than such an interpretation. It will argue that the Aboriginal objectification of their relationship to the land is not inherently a distancing of the land.

    KW - Aboriginal Australian painting

    KW - dwelling

    KW - emplacement

    KW - Landscape theory

    KW - representation

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887081278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887081278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/00141844.2012.726635

    DO - 10.1080/00141844.2012.726635

    M3 - Article

    VL - 78

    SP - 435

    EP - 463

    JO - Ethnos

    JF - Ethnos

    SN - 0014-1844

    IS - 4

    ER -