Effects of varying scoring rules of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in motor vehicle accident victims

Edward B. Blanchard, Edward J. Hickling, Ann E. Taylor, Catherine A. Forneris, Warren Loos, James Jaccard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined the effects of varying the scoring rules for the CAPS (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale) on the diagnosis of PTSD in a sample of 100 victims of recent motor vehicle accidents. This was done by assessing, for each scoring rule, the rate of categorical diagnosis and the effect on group mean scores on measures of subjective distress and role impairment. Changing from the most liberal to the most conservative scoring rule results in a change in diagnosis of PTSD from 44% to 29% of the sample. Comparisons of those included as PTSD under the most conservative scoring criteria vs those excluded (who had previously been included) reveal significantly greater subjective distress and role impairment among those who continue to be included in the PTSD category. Thus, changes in scoring rules have clinically significant effects on the incidence and severity of diagnosed PTSD. This indicates that the selection of scoring rules has important implications for epidemiological estimates of the prevalence of PTSD, and that PTSD studies using different scoring rules as inclusion criteria may be using somewhat different samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-475
Number of pages5
JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Motor Vehicles
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Accidents
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Effects of varying scoring rules of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in motor vehicle accident victims. / Blanchard, Edward B.; Hickling, Edward J.; Taylor, Ann E.; Forneris, Catherine A.; Loos, Warren; Jaccard, James.

In: Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1995, p. 471-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blanchard, Edward B. ; Hickling, Edward J. ; Taylor, Ann E. ; Forneris, Catherine A. ; Loos, Warren ; Jaccard, James. / Effects of varying scoring rules of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in motor vehicle accident victims. In: Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1995 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 471-475.
@article{ee901f5556e840458276947a16ab4a09,
title = "Effects of varying scoring rules of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in motor vehicle accident victims",
abstract = "We examined the effects of varying the scoring rules for the CAPS (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale) on the diagnosis of PTSD in a sample of 100 victims of recent motor vehicle accidents. This was done by assessing, for each scoring rule, the rate of categorical diagnosis and the effect on group mean scores on measures of subjective distress and role impairment. Changing from the most liberal to the most conservative scoring rule results in a change in diagnosis of PTSD from 44{\%} to 29{\%} of the sample. Comparisons of those included as PTSD under the most conservative scoring criteria vs those excluded (who had previously been included) reveal significantly greater subjective distress and role impairment among those who continue to be included in the PTSD category. Thus, changes in scoring rules have clinically significant effects on the incidence and severity of diagnosed PTSD. This indicates that the selection of scoring rules has important implications for epidemiological estimates of the prevalence of PTSD, and that PTSD studies using different scoring rules as inclusion criteria may be using somewhat different samples.",
author = "Blanchard, {Edward B.} and Hickling, {Edward J.} and Taylor, {Ann E.} and Forneris, {Catherine A.} and Warren Loos and James Jaccard",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0005-7967(94)00064-Q",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "471--475",
journal = "Behaviour Research and Therapy",
issn = "0005-7967",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of varying scoring rules of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in motor vehicle accident victims

AU - Blanchard, Edward B.

AU - Hickling, Edward J.

AU - Taylor, Ann E.

AU - Forneris, Catherine A.

AU - Loos, Warren

AU - Jaccard, James

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - We examined the effects of varying the scoring rules for the CAPS (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale) on the diagnosis of PTSD in a sample of 100 victims of recent motor vehicle accidents. This was done by assessing, for each scoring rule, the rate of categorical diagnosis and the effect on group mean scores on measures of subjective distress and role impairment. Changing from the most liberal to the most conservative scoring rule results in a change in diagnosis of PTSD from 44% to 29% of the sample. Comparisons of those included as PTSD under the most conservative scoring criteria vs those excluded (who had previously been included) reveal significantly greater subjective distress and role impairment among those who continue to be included in the PTSD category. Thus, changes in scoring rules have clinically significant effects on the incidence and severity of diagnosed PTSD. This indicates that the selection of scoring rules has important implications for epidemiological estimates of the prevalence of PTSD, and that PTSD studies using different scoring rules as inclusion criteria may be using somewhat different samples.

AB - We examined the effects of varying the scoring rules for the CAPS (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale) on the diagnosis of PTSD in a sample of 100 victims of recent motor vehicle accidents. This was done by assessing, for each scoring rule, the rate of categorical diagnosis and the effect on group mean scores on measures of subjective distress and role impairment. Changing from the most liberal to the most conservative scoring rule results in a change in diagnosis of PTSD from 44% to 29% of the sample. Comparisons of those included as PTSD under the most conservative scoring criteria vs those excluded (who had previously been included) reveal significantly greater subjective distress and role impairment among those who continue to be included in the PTSD category. Thus, changes in scoring rules have clinically significant effects on the incidence and severity of diagnosed PTSD. This indicates that the selection of scoring rules has important implications for epidemiological estimates of the prevalence of PTSD, and that PTSD studies using different scoring rules as inclusion criteria may be using somewhat different samples.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028956836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028956836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00064-Q

DO - 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00064-Q

M3 - Article

C2 - 7755537

AN - SCOPUS:0028956836

VL - 33

SP - 471

EP - 475

JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy

JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy

SN - 0005-7967

IS - 4

ER -