Effects of contrast on spatial binding and resolution

Isabelle Mareschal, R. M. Shapley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The recent finding that a neuron's area of spatial summation can vary depending on stimulus contrast has been interpreted as a trade-off between sensitivity (important in low contrast conditions) and resolution (important in high contrast conditions). In these experiments we examined spatial resolution psychophysically by measuring subjects' ability to discriminate fine orientation differences underlying grouping tasks as a function of contrast. This was done using contour stimuli embedded in distracters (i.e. Field, Hayes and Hess 1993; Kovacs and Julesz 1993). In our task, subjects had to discriminate between a "pure" contour and a "noisy" one that had orientation noise added to the elements. Thresholds were taken as the amount of noise required for subjects to perform the discrimination task at 80% correct levels. We find that when the stimuli were equated for detectability, the low contrast stimuli required the addition of substantially more orientation noise than the high contrast ones in order to be discriminated from a pure (noise free) stimulus. This suggests that judgments on fine orientation structure are less precise at low contrast than at high contrast. This may be due to the internal representation of the stimuli at low contrast being noisier than at high contrast, or because selectivity of the mechanism is reduced at low contrast. These psychophysical results support the physiological findings in suggesting a major re-organization of spatial vision at low contrast.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume2
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Noise
Low Vision
Aptitude
Neurons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Effects of contrast on spatial binding and resolution. / Mareschal, Isabelle; Shapley, R. M.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 2, No. 7, 2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{95d653f2212b4b948a1cb785eb4f519b,
title = "Effects of contrast on spatial binding and resolution",
abstract = "The recent finding that a neuron's area of spatial summation can vary depending on stimulus contrast has been interpreted as a trade-off between sensitivity (important in low contrast conditions) and resolution (important in high contrast conditions). In these experiments we examined spatial resolution psychophysically by measuring subjects' ability to discriminate fine orientation differences underlying grouping tasks as a function of contrast. This was done using contour stimuli embedded in distracters (i.e. Field, Hayes and Hess 1993; Kovacs and Julesz 1993). In our task, subjects had to discriminate between a {"}pure{"} contour and a {"}noisy{"} one that had orientation noise added to the elements. Thresholds were taken as the amount of noise required for subjects to perform the discrimination task at 80{\%} correct levels. We find that when the stimuli were equated for detectability, the low contrast stimuli required the addition of substantially more orientation noise than the high contrast ones in order to be discriminated from a pure (noise free) stimulus. This suggests that judgments on fine orientation structure are less precise at low contrast than at high contrast. This may be due to the internal representation of the stimuli at low contrast being noisier than at high contrast, or because selectivity of the mechanism is reduced at low contrast. These psychophysical results support the physiological findings in suggesting a major re-organization of spatial vision at low contrast.",
author = "Isabelle Mareschal and Shapley, {R. M.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1167/2.7.205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of contrast on spatial binding and resolution

AU - Mareschal, Isabelle

AU - Shapley, R. M.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The recent finding that a neuron's area of spatial summation can vary depending on stimulus contrast has been interpreted as a trade-off between sensitivity (important in low contrast conditions) and resolution (important in high contrast conditions). In these experiments we examined spatial resolution psychophysically by measuring subjects' ability to discriminate fine orientation differences underlying grouping tasks as a function of contrast. This was done using contour stimuli embedded in distracters (i.e. Field, Hayes and Hess 1993; Kovacs and Julesz 1993). In our task, subjects had to discriminate between a "pure" contour and a "noisy" one that had orientation noise added to the elements. Thresholds were taken as the amount of noise required for subjects to perform the discrimination task at 80% correct levels. We find that when the stimuli were equated for detectability, the low contrast stimuli required the addition of substantially more orientation noise than the high contrast ones in order to be discriminated from a pure (noise free) stimulus. This suggests that judgments on fine orientation structure are less precise at low contrast than at high contrast. This may be due to the internal representation of the stimuli at low contrast being noisier than at high contrast, or because selectivity of the mechanism is reduced at low contrast. These psychophysical results support the physiological findings in suggesting a major re-organization of spatial vision at low contrast.

AB - The recent finding that a neuron's area of spatial summation can vary depending on stimulus contrast has been interpreted as a trade-off between sensitivity (important in low contrast conditions) and resolution (important in high contrast conditions). In these experiments we examined spatial resolution psychophysically by measuring subjects' ability to discriminate fine orientation differences underlying grouping tasks as a function of contrast. This was done using contour stimuli embedded in distracters (i.e. Field, Hayes and Hess 1993; Kovacs and Julesz 1993). In our task, subjects had to discriminate between a "pure" contour and a "noisy" one that had orientation noise added to the elements. Thresholds were taken as the amount of noise required for subjects to perform the discrimination task at 80% correct levels. We find that when the stimuli were equated for detectability, the low contrast stimuli required the addition of substantially more orientation noise than the high contrast ones in order to be discriminated from a pure (noise free) stimulus. This suggests that judgments on fine orientation structure are less precise at low contrast than at high contrast. This may be due to the internal representation of the stimuli at low contrast being noisier than at high contrast, or because selectivity of the mechanism is reduced at low contrast. These psychophysical results support the physiological findings in suggesting a major re-organization of spatial vision at low contrast.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243069473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243069473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/2.7.205

DO - 10.1167/2.7.205

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4243069473

VL - 2

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 7

ER -