Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia

Ramanathan Srikanth, Tomaz Kosmac, Alvaro Della Bona, Ling Yin, Yu Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives To examine the effects of glass infiltration (GI) and alumina coating (AC) on the indentation flexural load and four-point bending strength of monolithic zirconia. Methods Plate-shaped (12 mm × 12 mm × 1.0 mm or 1.5 or 2.0 mm) and bar-shaped (4 mm × 3 mm × 25 mm) monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated. In addition to monolithic zirconia (group Z), zirconia monoliths were glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their tensile surfaces to form groups ZGI and ZAC, respectively. They were also glass-infiltrated on their upper surfaces, and glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their lower (tensile) surfaces to make groups ZGI2 and ZAC2, respectively. For comparison, porcelain-veneered zirconia (group PVZ) and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (group LiDi) specimens were also fabricated. The plate-shaped specimens were cemented onto a restorative composite base for Hertzian indentation using a tungsten carbide spherical indenter with a radius of 3.2 mm. Critical loads for indentation flexural fracture at the zirconia cementation surface were measured. Strengths of bar-shaped specimens were evaluated in four-point bending. Results Glass infiltration on zirconia tensile surfaces increased indentation flexural loads by 32% in Hertzian contact and flexural strength by 24% in four-point bending. Alumina coating showed no significant effect on resistance to flexural damage of zirconia. Monolithic zirconia outperformed porcelain-veneered zirconia and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramics in terms of both indentation flexural load and flexural strength. Significance While both alumina coating and glass infiltration can be used to effectively modify the cementation surface of zirconia, glass infiltration can further increase the flexural fracture resistance of zirconia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-442
Number of pages8
JournalDental Materials
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cementation
Zirconia
Surface treatment
Fracture toughness
Glass
Aluminum Oxide
Indentation
Alumina
Infiltration
Bending strength
Dental Porcelain
Porcelain
Glass ceramics
Coatings
zirconium oxide
Lithium
Tungsten carbide

Keywords

  • Alumina coating
  • Ceramic restorative materials
  • Flexural strength
  • Graded zirconia
  • Indentation flexural load
  • Surface modification
  • Zirconia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia. / Srikanth, Ramanathan; Kosmac, Tomaz; Della Bona, Alvaro; Yin, Ling; Zhang, Yu.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 435-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Srikanth, Ramanathan ; Kosmac, Tomaz ; Della Bona, Alvaro ; Yin, Ling ; Zhang, Yu. / Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia. In: Dental Materials. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 435-442.
@article{d097e2000e1745509084f4fba4a1b9c4,
title = "Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia",
abstract = "Objectives To examine the effects of glass infiltration (GI) and alumina coating (AC) on the indentation flexural load and four-point bending strength of monolithic zirconia. Methods Plate-shaped (12 mm × 12 mm × 1.0 mm or 1.5 or 2.0 mm) and bar-shaped (4 mm × 3 mm × 25 mm) monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated. In addition to monolithic zirconia (group Z), zirconia monoliths were glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their tensile surfaces to form groups ZGI and ZAC, respectively. They were also glass-infiltrated on their upper surfaces, and glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their lower (tensile) surfaces to make groups ZGI2 and ZAC2, respectively. For comparison, porcelain-veneered zirconia (group PVZ) and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (group LiDi) specimens were also fabricated. The plate-shaped specimens were cemented onto a restorative composite base for Hertzian indentation using a tungsten carbide spherical indenter with a radius of 3.2 mm. Critical loads for indentation flexural fracture at the zirconia cementation surface were measured. Strengths of bar-shaped specimens were evaluated in four-point bending. Results Glass infiltration on zirconia tensile surfaces increased indentation flexural loads by 32{\%} in Hertzian contact and flexural strength by 24{\%} in four-point bending. Alumina coating showed no significant effect on resistance to flexural damage of zirconia. Monolithic zirconia outperformed porcelain-veneered zirconia and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramics in terms of both indentation flexural load and flexural strength. Significance While both alumina coating and glass infiltration can be used to effectively modify the cementation surface of zirconia, glass infiltration can further increase the flexural fracture resistance of zirconia.",
keywords = "Alumina coating, Ceramic restorative materials, Flexural strength, Graded zirconia, Indentation flexural load, Surface modification, Zirconia",
author = "Ramanathan Srikanth and Tomaz Kosmac and {Della Bona}, Alvaro and Ling Yin and Yu Zhang",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "435--442",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia

AU - Srikanth, Ramanathan

AU - Kosmac, Tomaz

AU - Della Bona, Alvaro

AU - Yin, Ling

AU - Zhang, Yu

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Objectives To examine the effects of glass infiltration (GI) and alumina coating (AC) on the indentation flexural load and four-point bending strength of monolithic zirconia. Methods Plate-shaped (12 mm × 12 mm × 1.0 mm or 1.5 or 2.0 mm) and bar-shaped (4 mm × 3 mm × 25 mm) monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated. In addition to monolithic zirconia (group Z), zirconia monoliths were glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their tensile surfaces to form groups ZGI and ZAC, respectively. They were also glass-infiltrated on their upper surfaces, and glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their lower (tensile) surfaces to make groups ZGI2 and ZAC2, respectively. For comparison, porcelain-veneered zirconia (group PVZ) and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (group LiDi) specimens were also fabricated. The plate-shaped specimens were cemented onto a restorative composite base for Hertzian indentation using a tungsten carbide spherical indenter with a radius of 3.2 mm. Critical loads for indentation flexural fracture at the zirconia cementation surface were measured. Strengths of bar-shaped specimens were evaluated in four-point bending. Results Glass infiltration on zirconia tensile surfaces increased indentation flexural loads by 32% in Hertzian contact and flexural strength by 24% in four-point bending. Alumina coating showed no significant effect on resistance to flexural damage of zirconia. Monolithic zirconia outperformed porcelain-veneered zirconia and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramics in terms of both indentation flexural load and flexural strength. Significance While both alumina coating and glass infiltration can be used to effectively modify the cementation surface of zirconia, glass infiltration can further increase the flexural fracture resistance of zirconia.

AB - Objectives To examine the effects of glass infiltration (GI) and alumina coating (AC) on the indentation flexural load and four-point bending strength of monolithic zirconia. Methods Plate-shaped (12 mm × 12 mm × 1.0 mm or 1.5 or 2.0 mm) and bar-shaped (4 mm × 3 mm × 25 mm) monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated. In addition to monolithic zirconia (group Z), zirconia monoliths were glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their tensile surfaces to form groups ZGI and ZAC, respectively. They were also glass-infiltrated on their upper surfaces, and glass-infiltrated or alumina-coated on their lower (tensile) surfaces to make groups ZGI2 and ZAC2, respectively. For comparison, porcelain-veneered zirconia (group PVZ) and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (group LiDi) specimens were also fabricated. The plate-shaped specimens were cemented onto a restorative composite base for Hertzian indentation using a tungsten carbide spherical indenter with a radius of 3.2 mm. Critical loads for indentation flexural fracture at the zirconia cementation surface were measured. Strengths of bar-shaped specimens were evaluated in four-point bending. Results Glass infiltration on zirconia tensile surfaces increased indentation flexural loads by 32% in Hertzian contact and flexural strength by 24% in four-point bending. Alumina coating showed no significant effect on resistance to flexural damage of zirconia. Monolithic zirconia outperformed porcelain-veneered zirconia and monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramics in terms of both indentation flexural load and flexural strength. Significance While both alumina coating and glass infiltration can be used to effectively modify the cementation surface of zirconia, glass infiltration can further increase the flexural fracture resistance of zirconia.

KW - Alumina coating

KW - Ceramic restorative materials

KW - Flexural strength

KW - Graded zirconia

KW - Indentation flexural load

KW - Surface modification

KW - Zirconia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925778690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925778690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.013

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 435

EP - 442

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 4

ER -