Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud: A multicenter evaluation

Robert Needlman, Karen H. Toker, Benard P. Dreyer, Perri Klass, Alan L. Mendelsohn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Objective. - Failure to read at grade level predicts life-long economic and social disability. Early exposure to reading aloud may prevent reading problems. This study seeks to determine whether institution of Reach Out and Read (ROR) programs is associated with increased reading aloud in a national sample. Design. - Before-after intervention study: separate convenience samples were studied before and after institution of ROR programs at multiple sites. Participants and setting. - A convenience sample of parents of children age 6-72 months seeking routine health care at 19 clinical sites in 10 states. Interventions. - The ROR model incorporates anticipatory guidance about reading aloud and distribution of free picture books at health supervision visits from 6 months through 5 years as well as reading aloud in the waiting room. Main outcome measures. - Parents were interviewed about their attitudes and practices related to reading aloud, using questions drawn from validated instruments. Results. - The sample included 1647 subjects (730 intervention, 917 comparison). After controlling for multiple potential confounding factors, significant associations were found between exposure to ROR and reading aloud as a favorite parenting activity (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.6, P < .001); reading aloud at bedtime (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR*rsqb; 1.5, P < .001); reading aloud 3 or more days per week (AOR 1.8, P < .001); and ownership of ≥10 picture books (AOR 1.6, P < .001). Conclusions. - In a national sample, implementation of ROR programs was associated with increased parental support for reading aloud. This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of a primary care intervention strategy to promote reading aloud to young children.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)209-215
    Number of pages7
    JournalAmbulatory Pediatrics
    Volume5
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2005

    Fingerprint

    Reading
    Primary Health Care
    Odds Ratio
    Parents
    Ownership
    Parenting
    Economics
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Delivery of Health Care
    Health

    Keywords

    • Books
    • Literacy
    • Primary care
    • Reach out and read
    • Reading

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    Needlman, R., Toker, K. H., Dreyer, B. P., Klass, P., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2005). Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud: A multicenter evaluation. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5(4), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1367/A04-110R.1

    Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud : A multicenter evaluation. / Needlman, Robert; Toker, Karen H.; Dreyer, Benard P.; Klass, Perri; Mendelsohn, Alan L.

    In: Ambulatory Pediatrics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 07.2005, p. 209-215.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Needlman, R, Toker, KH, Dreyer, BP, Klass, P & Mendelsohn, AL 2005, 'Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud: A multicenter evaluation', Ambulatory Pediatrics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1367/A04-110R.1
    Needlman, Robert ; Toker, Karen H. ; Dreyer, Benard P. ; Klass, Perri ; Mendelsohn, Alan L. / Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud : A multicenter evaluation. In: Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2005 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 209-215.
    @article{893a4fea10e84d6f8a8a17327189f299,
    title = "Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud: A multicenter evaluation",
    abstract = "Objective. - Failure to read at grade level predicts life-long economic and social disability. Early exposure to reading aloud may prevent reading problems. This study seeks to determine whether institution of Reach Out and Read (ROR) programs is associated with increased reading aloud in a national sample. Design. - Before-after intervention study: separate convenience samples were studied before and after institution of ROR programs at multiple sites. Participants and setting. - A convenience sample of parents of children age 6-72 months seeking routine health care at 19 clinical sites in 10 states. Interventions. - The ROR model incorporates anticipatory guidance about reading aloud and distribution of free picture books at health supervision visits from 6 months through 5 years as well as reading aloud in the waiting room. Main outcome measures. - Parents were interviewed about their attitudes and practices related to reading aloud, using questions drawn from validated instruments. Results. - The sample included 1647 subjects (730 intervention, 917 comparison). After controlling for multiple potential confounding factors, significant associations were found between exposure to ROR and reading aloud as a favorite parenting activity (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.6, P < .001); reading aloud at bedtime (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR*rsqb; 1.5, P < .001); reading aloud 3 or more days per week (AOR 1.8, P < .001); and ownership of ≥10 picture books (AOR 1.6, P < .001). Conclusions. - In a national sample, implementation of ROR programs was associated with increased parental support for reading aloud. This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of a primary care intervention strategy to promote reading aloud to young children.",
    keywords = "Books, Literacy, Primary care, Reach out and read, Reading",
    author = "Robert Needlman and Toker, {Karen H.} and Dreyer, {Benard P.} and Perri Klass and Mendelsohn, {Alan L.}",
    year = "2005",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1367/A04-110R.1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "209--215",
    journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
    issn = "1876-2859",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud

    T2 - A multicenter evaluation

    AU - Needlman, Robert

    AU - Toker, Karen H.

    AU - Dreyer, Benard P.

    AU - Klass, Perri

    AU - Mendelsohn, Alan L.

    PY - 2005/7

    Y1 - 2005/7

    N2 - Objective. - Failure to read at grade level predicts life-long economic and social disability. Early exposure to reading aloud may prevent reading problems. This study seeks to determine whether institution of Reach Out and Read (ROR) programs is associated with increased reading aloud in a national sample. Design. - Before-after intervention study: separate convenience samples were studied before and after institution of ROR programs at multiple sites. Participants and setting. - A convenience sample of parents of children age 6-72 months seeking routine health care at 19 clinical sites in 10 states. Interventions. - The ROR model incorporates anticipatory guidance about reading aloud and distribution of free picture books at health supervision visits from 6 months through 5 years as well as reading aloud in the waiting room. Main outcome measures. - Parents were interviewed about their attitudes and practices related to reading aloud, using questions drawn from validated instruments. Results. - The sample included 1647 subjects (730 intervention, 917 comparison). After controlling for multiple potential confounding factors, significant associations were found between exposure to ROR and reading aloud as a favorite parenting activity (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.6, P < .001); reading aloud at bedtime (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR*rsqb; 1.5, P < .001); reading aloud 3 or more days per week (AOR 1.8, P < .001); and ownership of ≥10 picture books (AOR 1.6, P < .001). Conclusions. - In a national sample, implementation of ROR programs was associated with increased parental support for reading aloud. This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of a primary care intervention strategy to promote reading aloud to young children.

    AB - Objective. - Failure to read at grade level predicts life-long economic and social disability. Early exposure to reading aloud may prevent reading problems. This study seeks to determine whether institution of Reach Out and Read (ROR) programs is associated with increased reading aloud in a national sample. Design. - Before-after intervention study: separate convenience samples were studied before and after institution of ROR programs at multiple sites. Participants and setting. - A convenience sample of parents of children age 6-72 months seeking routine health care at 19 clinical sites in 10 states. Interventions. - The ROR model incorporates anticipatory guidance about reading aloud and distribution of free picture books at health supervision visits from 6 months through 5 years as well as reading aloud in the waiting room. Main outcome measures. - Parents were interviewed about their attitudes and practices related to reading aloud, using questions drawn from validated instruments. Results. - The sample included 1647 subjects (730 intervention, 917 comparison). After controlling for multiple potential confounding factors, significant associations were found between exposure to ROR and reading aloud as a favorite parenting activity (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.6, P < .001); reading aloud at bedtime (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR*rsqb; 1.5, P < .001); reading aloud 3 or more days per week (AOR 1.8, P < .001); and ownership of ≥10 picture books (AOR 1.6, P < .001). Conclusions. - In a national sample, implementation of ROR programs was associated with increased parental support for reading aloud. This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of a primary care intervention strategy to promote reading aloud to young children.

    KW - Books

    KW - Literacy

    KW - Primary care

    KW - Reach out and read

    KW - Reading

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23044500714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23044500714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1367/A04-110R.1

    DO - 10.1367/A04-110R.1

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 16026185

    AN - SCOPUS:23044500714

    VL - 5

    SP - 209

    EP - 215

    JO - Academic Pediatrics

    JF - Academic Pediatrics

    SN - 1876-2859

    IS - 4

    ER -