Effectiveness of a multi-level asthma intervention in increasing controller medication use

a randomized control trial

Glorisa Canino, Patrick Shrout, Doryliz Vila, Rafael Ramírez, Cynthia Rand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Poor self-management by families is an important factor in explaining high rates of asthma morbidity in Puerto Rico, and for this reason we previously tested a family intervention called CALMA that was found effective in improving most asthma outcomes, but not effective in increasing the use of controller medications. CALMA-plus was developed to address this issue by adding to CALMA, components of provider training and screening for asthma in clinics. Methods: Study participants were selected from claims Medicaid data in San Juan, Puerto Rico. After screening, 404 children in eight clinics were selected after forming pairs of clinics and randomizing the clinics) to CALMA-only or CALMA-plus. Results: For all three primary outcomes at 12 months, the mean differences between treatment arms were small but in the predicted direction. However, after adjusting for clinic variation, the study failed to demonstrate that the CALMA-plus intervention was more efficacious than the CALMA-only intervention for increasing controller medication use, or decreasing asthma symptoms. Both groups had lower rates of asthma symptoms and service utilization, consistent with previous results of the CALMA-only intervention. Conclusions: Compliance of providers with the intervention and training, small number of clinics available and the multiple barriers experienced by providers for medicating may have been related to the lack of difference observed between the groups. Future interventions should respond to the limitations of the present study design and provide more resources to providers that will increase provider participation in training and implementation of the intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Asthma
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 18 2016

Fingerprint

Asthma
Puerto Rico
Medicaid
Self Care
Morbidity
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Asthma medication intervention
  • Latinos
  • randomized control trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Effectiveness of a multi-level asthma intervention in increasing controller medication use : a randomized control trial. / Canino, Glorisa; Shrout, Patrick; Vila, Doryliz; Ramírez, Rafael; Rand, Cynthia.

In: Journal of Asthma, 18.01.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d282f9150434c67b0ab3166df8270c0,
title = "Effectiveness of a multi-level asthma intervention in increasing controller medication use: a randomized control trial",
abstract = "Introduction: Poor self-management by families is an important factor in explaining high rates of asthma morbidity in Puerto Rico, and for this reason we previously tested a family intervention called CALMA that was found effective in improving most asthma outcomes, but not effective in increasing the use of controller medications. CALMA-plus was developed to address this issue by adding to CALMA, components of provider training and screening for asthma in clinics. Methods: Study participants were selected from claims Medicaid data in San Juan, Puerto Rico. After screening, 404 children in eight clinics were selected after forming pairs of clinics and randomizing the clinics) to CALMA-only or CALMA-plus. Results: For all three primary outcomes at 12 months, the mean differences between treatment arms were small but in the predicted direction. However, after adjusting for clinic variation, the study failed to demonstrate that the CALMA-plus intervention was more efficacious than the CALMA-only intervention for increasing controller medication use, or decreasing asthma symptoms. Both groups had lower rates of asthma symptoms and service utilization, consistent with previous results of the CALMA-only intervention. Conclusions: Compliance of providers with the intervention and training, small number of clinics available and the multiple barriers experienced by providers for medicating may have been related to the lack of difference observed between the groups. Future interventions should respond to the limitations of the present study design and provide more resources to providers that will increase provider participation in training and implementation of the intervention.",
keywords = "Asthma medication intervention, Latinos, randomized control trial",
author = "Glorisa Canino and Patrick Shrout and Doryliz Vila and Rafael Ram{\'i}rez and Cynthia Rand",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.3109/02770903.2015.1057846",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Asthma",
issn = "0277-0903",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of a multi-level asthma intervention in increasing controller medication use

T2 - a randomized control trial

AU - Canino, Glorisa

AU - Shrout, Patrick

AU - Vila, Doryliz

AU - Ramírez, Rafael

AU - Rand, Cynthia

PY - 2016/1/18

Y1 - 2016/1/18

N2 - Introduction: Poor self-management by families is an important factor in explaining high rates of asthma morbidity in Puerto Rico, and for this reason we previously tested a family intervention called CALMA that was found effective in improving most asthma outcomes, but not effective in increasing the use of controller medications. CALMA-plus was developed to address this issue by adding to CALMA, components of provider training and screening for asthma in clinics. Methods: Study participants were selected from claims Medicaid data in San Juan, Puerto Rico. After screening, 404 children in eight clinics were selected after forming pairs of clinics and randomizing the clinics) to CALMA-only or CALMA-plus. Results: For all three primary outcomes at 12 months, the mean differences between treatment arms were small but in the predicted direction. However, after adjusting for clinic variation, the study failed to demonstrate that the CALMA-plus intervention was more efficacious than the CALMA-only intervention for increasing controller medication use, or decreasing asthma symptoms. Both groups had lower rates of asthma symptoms and service utilization, consistent with previous results of the CALMA-only intervention. Conclusions: Compliance of providers with the intervention and training, small number of clinics available and the multiple barriers experienced by providers for medicating may have been related to the lack of difference observed between the groups. Future interventions should respond to the limitations of the present study design and provide more resources to providers that will increase provider participation in training and implementation of the intervention.

AB - Introduction: Poor self-management by families is an important factor in explaining high rates of asthma morbidity in Puerto Rico, and for this reason we previously tested a family intervention called CALMA that was found effective in improving most asthma outcomes, but not effective in increasing the use of controller medications. CALMA-plus was developed to address this issue by adding to CALMA, components of provider training and screening for asthma in clinics. Methods: Study participants were selected from claims Medicaid data in San Juan, Puerto Rico. After screening, 404 children in eight clinics were selected after forming pairs of clinics and randomizing the clinics) to CALMA-only or CALMA-plus. Results: For all three primary outcomes at 12 months, the mean differences between treatment arms were small but in the predicted direction. However, after adjusting for clinic variation, the study failed to demonstrate that the CALMA-plus intervention was more efficacious than the CALMA-only intervention for increasing controller medication use, or decreasing asthma symptoms. Both groups had lower rates of asthma symptoms and service utilization, consistent with previous results of the CALMA-only intervention. Conclusions: Compliance of providers with the intervention and training, small number of clinics available and the multiple barriers experienced by providers for medicating may have been related to the lack of difference observed between the groups. Future interventions should respond to the limitations of the present study design and provide more resources to providers that will increase provider participation in training and implementation of the intervention.

KW - Asthma medication intervention

KW - Latinos

KW - randomized control trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955152123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955152123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02770903.2015.1057846

DO - 10.3109/02770903.2015.1057846

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Asthma

JF - Journal of Asthma

SN - 0277-0903

ER -