Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration

Arpita Patel, Luiz Fernando Gil, Arthur Castellano, Gileade Freitas, Daniel Navarro, Ana P. Peredo, Nick Tovar, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e82-e87
JournalThe International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Osseointegration
Bone and Bones
Dogs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration. / Patel, Arpita; Gil, Luiz Fernando; Castellano, Arthur; Freitas, Gileade; Navarro, Daniel; Peredo, Ana P.; Tovar, Nick; Coelho, Paulo.

In: The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2016, p. e82-e87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, A, Gil, LF, Castellano, A, Freitas, G, Navarro, D, Peredo, AP, Tovar, N & Coelho, P 2016, 'Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration', The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. e82-e87. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2755
Patel, Arpita ; Gil, Luiz Fernando ; Castellano, Arthur ; Freitas, Gileade ; Navarro, Daniel ; Peredo, Ana P. ; Tovar, Nick ; Coelho, Paulo. / Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration. In: The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2016 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. e82-e87.
@article{b303f8e5ecbb4ce6897e7684d9a17202,
title = "Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration",
abstract = "This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.",
author = "Arpita Patel and Gil, {Luiz Fernando} and Arthur Castellano and Gileade Freitas and Daniel Navarro and Peredo, {Ana P.} and Nick Tovar and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.11607/prd.2755",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "e82--e87",
journal = "The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry",
issn = "0198-7569",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration

AU - Patel, Arpita

AU - Gil, Luiz Fernando

AU - Castellano, Arthur

AU - Freitas, Gileade

AU - Navarro, Daniel

AU - Peredo, Ana P.

AU - Tovar, Nick

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.

AB - This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984863657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984863657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11607/prd.2755

DO - 10.11607/prd.2755

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - e82-e87

JO - The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry

JF - The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry

SN - 0198-7569

IS - 5

ER -