Effect of rater orientation on the evaluation of therapeutic alliance

Patrick J. Raue, Jill T. Putterman, Marvin R. Goldfried, David L. Wolitzky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Alliance ratings from psychodynamic coders were compared with those of cognitive-behavioral coders on the same data set of significant psychodynamic-interpersonal (n = 13) and cognitive-behavior therapy sessions (n = 18). Results indicate a high correspondence between the ratings of the two sets of coders. The psychodynamic coders, however, rated both therapy conditions significantly lower than the cognitive- behavioral coders. Unlike cognitive-behavioral coders, psychodynamic coders did not rate cognitive-behavior sessions significantly higher than psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. Implications for research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-342
Number of pages6
JournalPsychotherapy Research
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Research
Therapeutics
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Raue, P. J., Putterman, J. T., Goldfried, M. R., & Wolitzky, D. L. (1995). Effect of rater orientation on the evaluation of therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 5(4), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503309512331331446

Effect of rater orientation on the evaluation of therapeutic alliance. / Raue, Patrick J.; Putterman, Jill T.; Goldfried, Marvin R.; Wolitzky, David L.

In: Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1995, p. 337-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raue, PJ, Putterman, JT, Goldfried, MR & Wolitzky, DL 1995, 'Effect of rater orientation on the evaluation of therapeutic alliance', Psychotherapy Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503309512331331446
Raue, Patrick J. ; Putterman, Jill T. ; Goldfried, Marvin R. ; Wolitzky, David L. / Effect of rater orientation on the evaluation of therapeutic alliance. In: Psychotherapy Research. 1995 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 337-342.
@article{1076372e2fcd4ec59d8f0f6f7d9f5cb0,
title = "Effect of rater orientation on the evaluation of therapeutic alliance",
abstract = "Alliance ratings from psychodynamic coders were compared with those of cognitive-behavioral coders on the same data set of significant psychodynamic-interpersonal (n = 13) and cognitive-behavior therapy sessions (n = 18). Results indicate a high correspondence between the ratings of the two sets of coders. The psychodynamic coders, however, rated both therapy conditions significantly lower than the cognitive- behavioral coders. Unlike cognitive-behavioral coders, psychodynamic coders did not rate cognitive-behavior sessions significantly higher than psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. Implications for research are discussed.",
author = "Raue, {Patrick J.} and Putterman, {Jill T.} and Goldfried, {Marvin R.} and Wolitzky, {David L.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1080/10503309512331331446",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "337--342",
journal = "Psychotherapy Research",
issn = "1050-3307",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of rater orientation on the evaluation of therapeutic alliance

AU - Raue, Patrick J.

AU - Putterman, Jill T.

AU - Goldfried, Marvin R.

AU - Wolitzky, David L.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Alliance ratings from psychodynamic coders were compared with those of cognitive-behavioral coders on the same data set of significant psychodynamic-interpersonal (n = 13) and cognitive-behavior therapy sessions (n = 18). Results indicate a high correspondence between the ratings of the two sets of coders. The psychodynamic coders, however, rated both therapy conditions significantly lower than the cognitive- behavioral coders. Unlike cognitive-behavioral coders, psychodynamic coders did not rate cognitive-behavior sessions significantly higher than psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. Implications for research are discussed.

AB - Alliance ratings from psychodynamic coders were compared with those of cognitive-behavioral coders on the same data set of significant psychodynamic-interpersonal (n = 13) and cognitive-behavior therapy sessions (n = 18). Results indicate a high correspondence between the ratings of the two sets of coders. The psychodynamic coders, however, rated both therapy conditions significantly lower than the cognitive- behavioral coders. Unlike cognitive-behavioral coders, psychodynamic coders did not rate cognitive-behavior sessions significantly higher than psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. Implications for research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0010724648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0010724648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10503309512331331446

DO - 10.1080/10503309512331331446

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 337

EP - 342

JO - Psychotherapy Research

JF - Psychotherapy Research

SN - 1050-3307

IS - 4

ER -