Effect of low speed drilling on osseointegration using simplified drilling procedures

A. Sarendranath, R. Khan, N. Tovar, C. Marin, D. Yoo, J. Redisch, R. Jimbo, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our aim was to find out whether simplified drilling protocols would provide biological responses comparable to those of conventional drilling protocols at the low rotational speed of 400 rpm. Seventy-eight root form endosseous implants with diameters of 3.75, 4.2, and 5 mm were placed into canine tibias and allowed to heal for 3 and 5 weeks. After the dogs had been killed, the samples of implanted bone were retrieved and processed for non-decalcified histological sectioning. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) analyses were made on the histological sections. Implants treated by the simplified protocol resulted in BIC and BAFO values comparable to those obtained with the conventional drilling protocol, and there were no significant differences in the technique or diameter of the drilling. The results suggest that the simplified procedure gives biological outcomes comparable to those of the conventional procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)550-556
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Osseointegration
Bone and Bones
Tibia
Canidae
Dogs

Keywords

  • Drilling protocol
  • Histomorphometry
  • Low-speed
  • Osseointegration
  • Simplification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Effect of low speed drilling on osseointegration using simplified drilling procedures. / Sarendranath, A.; Khan, R.; Tovar, N.; Marin, C.; Yoo, D.; Redisch, J.; Jimbo, R.; Coelho, Paulo.

In: British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 53, No. 6, 2015, p. 550-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sarendranath, A. ; Khan, R. ; Tovar, N. ; Marin, C. ; Yoo, D. ; Redisch, J. ; Jimbo, R. ; Coelho, Paulo. / Effect of low speed drilling on osseointegration using simplified drilling procedures. In: British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 53, No. 6. pp. 550-556.
@article{c4d3c99d1a9842cd820fdd2905188ffc,
title = "Effect of low speed drilling on osseointegration using simplified drilling procedures",
abstract = "Our aim was to find out whether simplified drilling protocols would provide biological responses comparable to those of conventional drilling protocols at the low rotational speed of 400 rpm. Seventy-eight root form endosseous implants with diameters of 3.75, 4.2, and 5 mm were placed into canine tibias and allowed to heal for 3 and 5 weeks. After the dogs had been killed, the samples of implanted bone were retrieved and processed for non-decalcified histological sectioning. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) analyses were made on the histological sections. Implants treated by the simplified protocol resulted in BIC and BAFO values comparable to those obtained with the conventional drilling protocol, and there were no significant differences in the technique or diameter of the drilling. The results suggest that the simplified procedure gives biological outcomes comparable to those of the conventional procedure.",
keywords = "Drilling protocol, Histomorphometry, Low-speed, Osseointegration, Simplification",
author = "A. Sarendranath and R. Khan and N. Tovar and C. Marin and D. Yoo and J. Redisch and R. Jimbo and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.03.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "550--556",
journal = "British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0266-4356",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of low speed drilling on osseointegration using simplified drilling procedures

AU - Sarendranath, A.

AU - Khan, R.

AU - Tovar, N.

AU - Marin, C.

AU - Yoo, D.

AU - Redisch, J.

AU - Jimbo, R.

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Our aim was to find out whether simplified drilling protocols would provide biological responses comparable to those of conventional drilling protocols at the low rotational speed of 400 rpm. Seventy-eight root form endosseous implants with diameters of 3.75, 4.2, and 5 mm were placed into canine tibias and allowed to heal for 3 and 5 weeks. After the dogs had been killed, the samples of implanted bone were retrieved and processed for non-decalcified histological sectioning. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) analyses were made on the histological sections. Implants treated by the simplified protocol resulted in BIC and BAFO values comparable to those obtained with the conventional drilling protocol, and there were no significant differences in the technique or diameter of the drilling. The results suggest that the simplified procedure gives biological outcomes comparable to those of the conventional procedure.

AB - Our aim was to find out whether simplified drilling protocols would provide biological responses comparable to those of conventional drilling protocols at the low rotational speed of 400 rpm. Seventy-eight root form endosseous implants with diameters of 3.75, 4.2, and 5 mm were placed into canine tibias and allowed to heal for 3 and 5 weeks. After the dogs had been killed, the samples of implanted bone were retrieved and processed for non-decalcified histological sectioning. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) analyses were made on the histological sections. Implants treated by the simplified protocol resulted in BIC and BAFO values comparable to those obtained with the conventional drilling protocol, and there were no significant differences in the technique or diameter of the drilling. The results suggest that the simplified procedure gives biological outcomes comparable to those of the conventional procedure.

KW - Drilling protocol

KW - Histomorphometry

KW - Low-speed

KW - Osseointegration

KW - Simplification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960801459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960801459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.03.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 25921363

AN - SCOPUS:84960801459

VL - 53

SP - 550

EP - 556

JO - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0266-4356

IS - 6

ER -