Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns

Regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform

Amilcar C. Freitas Júnior, Estevam A. Bonfante, Nelson R F A Silva, Leonard Marotta, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and failure modes of regular and horizontal mismatched platforms for implant-abutment connection varying the implant diameter. Material and methods: Regular (REG, n = 21, 4.0-mm-diameter implant) and horizontal mismatched (HM, n = 21, 4.6-mm-diameter implant) platform Ti-6Al-4V implants were restored with proprietary identical Ti-6Al-4V abutments and metal crowns (cobalt-chrome, Wirobond® 280, BEGO, Bremen, Germany) cemented. Mechanical testing comprised step-stress accelerated-life testing, where crowns were distributed in three loading profiles for fatigue in water, producing timely and clinically relevant fractures. The probability of failure vs. cycles (95% two-sided confidence intervals) was calculated and plotted using a powerlaw relationship for damage accumulation, Weibull modulus (95% two-sided confidence intervals) and then the reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load (95% two-sided confidence interval) were calculated. Fractography was performed in the scanning electron microscope. Results: The β-value for group REG (β = 1.37) indicated that fatigue was a factor accelerating the failure, whereas load alone dictated the failure for group HM (β = 0.71). The Weibull parameter contour plot showed no significantly different Weibull modulus for REG (10.24) compared to HM (10.20) and characteristic strength of 162.6 and 166.8 N, respectively (P > 0.91). The calculated reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load was not significantly different (0.71 for REG and 0.73 for HM). Abutment screw failure was the chief failure mode. Conclusions: Reliability was not significantly different between groups and failure modes were similar.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1123-1126
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Crowns
Confidence Intervals
Fatigue
Cobalt
Psychological Stress
Germany
Metals
Electrons
Water

Keywords

  • Diameter shifting
  • Fractography
  • Implant-abutment connection
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns : Regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform. / Freitas Júnior, Amilcar C.; Bonfante, Estevam A.; Silva, Nelson R F A; Marotta, Leonard; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 23, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 1123-1126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freitas Júnior, Amilcar C. ; Bonfante, Estevam A. ; Silva, Nelson R F A ; Marotta, Leonard ; Coelho, Paulo. / Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns : Regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 9. pp. 1123-1126.
@article{df74c1e34dc14cedadbbd418dc02a813,
title = "Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns: Regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and failure modes of regular and horizontal mismatched platforms for implant-abutment connection varying the implant diameter. Material and methods: Regular (REG, n = 21, 4.0-mm-diameter implant) and horizontal mismatched (HM, n = 21, 4.6-mm-diameter implant) platform Ti-6Al-4V implants were restored with proprietary identical Ti-6Al-4V abutments and metal crowns (cobalt-chrome, Wirobond{\circledR} 280, BEGO, Bremen, Germany) cemented. Mechanical testing comprised step-stress accelerated-life testing, where crowns were distributed in three loading profiles for fatigue in water, producing timely and clinically relevant fractures. The probability of failure vs. cycles (95{\%} two-sided confidence intervals) was calculated and plotted using a powerlaw relationship for damage accumulation, Weibull modulus (95{\%} two-sided confidence intervals) and then the reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load (95{\%} two-sided confidence interval) were calculated. Fractography was performed in the scanning electron microscope. Results: The β-value for group REG (β = 1.37) indicated that fatigue was a factor accelerating the failure, whereas load alone dictated the failure for group HM (β = 0.71). The Weibull parameter contour plot showed no significantly different Weibull modulus for REG (10.24) compared to HM (10.20) and characteristic strength of 162.6 and 166.8 N, respectively (P > 0.91). The calculated reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load was not significantly different (0.71 for REG and 0.73 for HM). Abutment screw failure was the chief failure mode. Conclusions: Reliability was not significantly different between groups and failure modes were similar.",
keywords = "Diameter shifting, Fractography, Implant-abutment connection, Reliability",
author = "{Freitas J{\'u}nior}, {Amilcar C.} and Bonfante, {Estevam A.} and Silva, {Nelson R F A} and Leonard Marotta and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02257.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1123--1126",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns

T2 - Regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform

AU - Freitas Júnior, Amilcar C.

AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.

AU - Silva, Nelson R F A

AU - Marotta, Leonard

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and failure modes of regular and horizontal mismatched platforms for implant-abutment connection varying the implant diameter. Material and methods: Regular (REG, n = 21, 4.0-mm-diameter implant) and horizontal mismatched (HM, n = 21, 4.6-mm-diameter implant) platform Ti-6Al-4V implants were restored with proprietary identical Ti-6Al-4V abutments and metal crowns (cobalt-chrome, Wirobond® 280, BEGO, Bremen, Germany) cemented. Mechanical testing comprised step-stress accelerated-life testing, where crowns were distributed in three loading profiles for fatigue in water, producing timely and clinically relevant fractures. The probability of failure vs. cycles (95% two-sided confidence intervals) was calculated and plotted using a powerlaw relationship for damage accumulation, Weibull modulus (95% two-sided confidence intervals) and then the reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load (95% two-sided confidence interval) were calculated. Fractography was performed in the scanning electron microscope. Results: The β-value for group REG (β = 1.37) indicated that fatigue was a factor accelerating the failure, whereas load alone dictated the failure for group HM (β = 0.71). The Weibull parameter contour plot showed no significantly different Weibull modulus for REG (10.24) compared to HM (10.20) and characteristic strength of 162.6 and 166.8 N, respectively (P > 0.91). The calculated reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load was not significantly different (0.71 for REG and 0.73 for HM). Abutment screw failure was the chief failure mode. Conclusions: Reliability was not significantly different between groups and failure modes were similar.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and failure modes of regular and horizontal mismatched platforms for implant-abutment connection varying the implant diameter. Material and methods: Regular (REG, n = 21, 4.0-mm-diameter implant) and horizontal mismatched (HM, n = 21, 4.6-mm-diameter implant) platform Ti-6Al-4V implants were restored with proprietary identical Ti-6Al-4V abutments and metal crowns (cobalt-chrome, Wirobond® 280, BEGO, Bremen, Germany) cemented. Mechanical testing comprised step-stress accelerated-life testing, where crowns were distributed in three loading profiles for fatigue in water, producing timely and clinically relevant fractures. The probability of failure vs. cycles (95% two-sided confidence intervals) was calculated and plotted using a powerlaw relationship for damage accumulation, Weibull modulus (95% two-sided confidence intervals) and then the reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load (95% two-sided confidence interval) were calculated. Fractography was performed in the scanning electron microscope. Results: The β-value for group REG (β = 1.37) indicated that fatigue was a factor accelerating the failure, whereas load alone dictated the failure for group HM (β = 0.71). The Weibull parameter contour plot showed no significantly different Weibull modulus for REG (10.24) compared to HM (10.20) and characteristic strength of 162.6 and 166.8 N, respectively (P > 0.91). The calculated reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load was not significantly different (0.71 for REG and 0.73 for HM). Abutment screw failure was the chief failure mode. Conclusions: Reliability was not significantly different between groups and failure modes were similar.

KW - Diameter shifting

KW - Fractography

KW - Implant-abutment connection

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865306187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865306187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02257.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02257.x

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1123

EP - 1126

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 9

ER -