Education finance reform

A dynamic perspective

Raquel Fernandez, Richard Rogerson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We use a dynamic Tiebout model to analyze the consequences of moving from a pure local system of education finance to a pure state system of finance in which each student receives the same resources. While much of the education finance literature focuses on the static or immediate effects of such a change, our analysis also examines the dynamic effects. Numerical simulations for a calibrated version of our model indicate that these dynamic effects are very important. Comparing steady states, we find that aggregate welfare increases on the order of 10 percent following the switch to a state system. The key to this welfare gain is that a local system yields inefficiently low investment in human capital of children from low-income families.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)67-84
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Policy Analysis and Management
    Volume16
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Dec 1997

    Fingerprint

    finance
    reform
    education
    welfare
    human capital
    low income
    simulation
    Education finance
    resources
    student
    Dynamic effects

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Public Administration

    Cite this

    Education finance reform : A dynamic perspective. / Fernandez, Raquel; Rogerson, Richard.

    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, 12.1997, p. 67-84.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Fernandez, R & Rogerson, R 1997, 'Education finance reform: A dynamic perspective', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 67-84.
    Fernandez, Raquel ; Rogerson, Richard. / Education finance reform : A dynamic perspective. In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1997 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 67-84.
    @article{eccbea878ba149ff99e1c9ef28183c0a,
    title = "Education finance reform: A dynamic perspective",
    abstract = "We use a dynamic Tiebout model to analyze the consequences of moving from a pure local system of education finance to a pure state system of finance in which each student receives the same resources. While much of the education finance literature focuses on the static or immediate effects of such a change, our analysis also examines the dynamic effects. Numerical simulations for a calibrated version of our model indicate that these dynamic effects are very important. Comparing steady states, we find that aggregate welfare increases on the order of 10 percent following the switch to a state system. The key to this welfare gain is that a local system yields inefficiently low investment in human capital of children from low-income families.",
    author = "Raquel Fernandez and Richard Rogerson",
    year = "1997",
    month = "12",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "67--84",
    journal = "Journal of Policy Analysis and Management",
    issn = "0276-8739",
    publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Education finance reform

    T2 - A dynamic perspective

    AU - Fernandez, Raquel

    AU - Rogerson, Richard

    PY - 1997/12

    Y1 - 1997/12

    N2 - We use a dynamic Tiebout model to analyze the consequences of moving from a pure local system of education finance to a pure state system of finance in which each student receives the same resources. While much of the education finance literature focuses on the static or immediate effects of such a change, our analysis also examines the dynamic effects. Numerical simulations for a calibrated version of our model indicate that these dynamic effects are very important. Comparing steady states, we find that aggregate welfare increases on the order of 10 percent following the switch to a state system. The key to this welfare gain is that a local system yields inefficiently low investment in human capital of children from low-income families.

    AB - We use a dynamic Tiebout model to analyze the consequences of moving from a pure local system of education finance to a pure state system of finance in which each student receives the same resources. While much of the education finance literature focuses on the static or immediate effects of such a change, our analysis also examines the dynamic effects. Numerical simulations for a calibrated version of our model indicate that these dynamic effects are very important. Comparing steady states, we find that aggregate welfare increases on the order of 10 percent following the switch to a state system. The key to this welfare gain is that a local system yields inefficiently low investment in human capital of children from low-income families.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031542895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031542895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 67

    EP - 84

    JO - Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

    JF - Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

    SN - 0276-8739

    IS - 1

    ER -