Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices: Understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions

Patrick S. Ward, Andrew Bell, Klaus Droppelmann, Tim G. Benton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Land degradation and soil erosion have emerged as serious challenges to smallholder farmers throughout Southern Africa. To combat these challenges, conservation agriculture (CA) – a suite of agricultural practices consisting of zero tillage, mulching of crop residues, and intercropping with legumes – is widely promoted as a “sustainable” package of agricultural practices. Despite the many potential benefits of CA, however, adoption remains low. Yet relatively little is known about the decisionmaking process in choosing to adopt CA or any of its constituent practices. This article attempts to fill this important knowledge gap by studying CA adoption in southern Malawi. Unlike what is implicitly assumed when these packages of practices are introduced, farmers view adoption of CA as a series of separate decisions, rather than a single decision. But the adoption decisions need not be wholly independent. We find strong evidence of interrelated decisions, particularly among mulching crop residues and practicing zero tillage, suggesting that mulching residues and intercropping or rotating with legumes introduces a multiplier effect on the adoption of zero tillage.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)27-37
    Number of pages11
    JournalLand Use Policy
    Volume70
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    compliance
    conservation
    agriculture
    mulching
    zero tillage
    no-tillage
    intercropping
    crop residue
    agricultural practice
    crop residues
    farmer
    legumes
    farmers
    multipliers
    knowledge gap
    land degradation
    Malawi
    multiplier
    smallholder
    Southern Africa

    Keywords

    • Conservation agriculture
    • Malawi
    • Multivariate probit
    • Technology adoption

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Forestry
    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Nature and Landscape Conservation
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

    Cite this

    Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices : Understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions. / Ward, Patrick S.; Bell, Andrew; Droppelmann, Klaus; Benton, Tim G.

    In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 70, 01.01.2018, p. 27-37.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ward, Patrick S. ; Bell, Andrew ; Droppelmann, Klaus ; Benton, Tim G. / Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices : Understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions. In: Land Use Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 70. pp. 27-37.
    @article{b5116136086b43af8b231f260cbc2ce2,
    title = "Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices: Understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions",
    abstract = "Land degradation and soil erosion have emerged as serious challenges to smallholder farmers throughout Southern Africa. To combat these challenges, conservation agriculture (CA) – a suite of agricultural practices consisting of zero tillage, mulching of crop residues, and intercropping with legumes – is widely promoted as a “sustainable” package of agricultural practices. Despite the many potential benefits of CA, however, adoption remains low. Yet relatively little is known about the decisionmaking process in choosing to adopt CA or any of its constituent practices. This article attempts to fill this important knowledge gap by studying CA adoption in southern Malawi. Unlike what is implicitly assumed when these packages of practices are introduced, farmers view adoption of CA as a series of separate decisions, rather than a single decision. But the adoption decisions need not be wholly independent. We find strong evidence of interrelated decisions, particularly among mulching crop residues and practicing zero tillage, suggesting that mulching residues and intercropping or rotating with legumes introduces a multiplier effect on the adoption of zero tillage.",
    keywords = "Conservation agriculture, Malawi, Multivariate probit, Technology adoption",
    author = "Ward, {Patrick S.} and Andrew Bell and Klaus Droppelmann and Benton, {Tim G.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.001",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "70",
    pages = "27--37",
    journal = "Land Use Policy",
    issn = "0264-8377",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices

    T2 - Understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions

    AU - Ward, Patrick S.

    AU - Bell, Andrew

    AU - Droppelmann, Klaus

    AU - Benton, Tim G.

    PY - 2018/1/1

    Y1 - 2018/1/1

    N2 - Land degradation and soil erosion have emerged as serious challenges to smallholder farmers throughout Southern Africa. To combat these challenges, conservation agriculture (CA) – a suite of agricultural practices consisting of zero tillage, mulching of crop residues, and intercropping with legumes – is widely promoted as a “sustainable” package of agricultural practices. Despite the many potential benefits of CA, however, adoption remains low. Yet relatively little is known about the decisionmaking process in choosing to adopt CA or any of its constituent practices. This article attempts to fill this important knowledge gap by studying CA adoption in southern Malawi. Unlike what is implicitly assumed when these packages of practices are introduced, farmers view adoption of CA as a series of separate decisions, rather than a single decision. But the adoption decisions need not be wholly independent. We find strong evidence of interrelated decisions, particularly among mulching crop residues and practicing zero tillage, suggesting that mulching residues and intercropping or rotating with legumes introduces a multiplier effect on the adoption of zero tillage.

    AB - Land degradation and soil erosion have emerged as serious challenges to smallholder farmers throughout Southern Africa. To combat these challenges, conservation agriculture (CA) – a suite of agricultural practices consisting of zero tillage, mulching of crop residues, and intercropping with legumes – is widely promoted as a “sustainable” package of agricultural practices. Despite the many potential benefits of CA, however, adoption remains low. Yet relatively little is known about the decisionmaking process in choosing to adopt CA or any of its constituent practices. This article attempts to fill this important knowledge gap by studying CA adoption in southern Malawi. Unlike what is implicitly assumed when these packages of practices are introduced, farmers view adoption of CA as a series of separate decisions, rather than a single decision. But the adoption decisions need not be wholly independent. We find strong evidence of interrelated decisions, particularly among mulching crop residues and practicing zero tillage, suggesting that mulching residues and intercropping or rotating with legumes introduces a multiplier effect on the adoption of zero tillage.

    KW - Conservation agriculture

    KW - Malawi

    KW - Multivariate probit

    KW - Technology adoption

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031726856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031726856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.001

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85031726856

    VL - 70

    SP - 27

    EP - 37

    JO - Land Use Policy

    JF - Land Use Policy

    SN - 0264-8377

    ER -