Dynamics of politcal polarization

Delia Baldassarri, Peter Bearman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article accounts for two puzzling paradoxes. The first paradox is the simultaneous absence and presence of attitude polarization - the fact that global attitude polarization is relatively rare, even though pundits describe it as common. The second paradox is the simultaneous presence and absence of social polarization - the fact that while individuals experience attitude homogeneity in their interpersonal networks, their networks are characterized by attitude heterogeneity. These paradoxes give rise to numerous scholarly arguments. By developing a formal model of interpersonal influence over attitudes in a context where individuals hold simultaneous positions on multiple issues, we show why these arguments are not mutually exclusive and how they meaningfully refer to the same social setting. The results from this model provide a single parsimonious account for both paradoxes. The framework we develop may be generalized to a wider array of problems, including classic problems in collective action.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)784-811
    Number of pages28
    JournalAmerican Sociological Review
    Volume72
    Issue number5
    StatePublished - Oct 2007

    Fingerprint

    polarization
    collective behavior
    experience

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of politcal polarization. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 784-811.

    Dynamics of politcal polarization. / Baldassarri, Delia; Bearman, Peter.

    In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 72, No. 5, 10.2007, p. 784-811.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Baldassarri, D & Bearman, P 2007, 'Dynamics of politcal polarization', American Sociological Review, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 784-811.
    Baldassarri D, Bearman P. Dynamics of politcal polarization. American Sociological Review. 2007 Oct;72(5):784-811.
    Baldassarri, Delia ; Bearman, Peter. / Dynamics of politcal polarization. In: American Sociological Review. 2007 ; Vol. 72, No. 5. pp. 784-811.
    @article{3a00fa55569b40638cdbd3e0b3115872,
    title = "Dynamics of politcal polarization",
    abstract = "This article accounts for two puzzling paradoxes. The first paradox is the simultaneous absence and presence of attitude polarization - the fact that global attitude polarization is relatively rare, even though pundits describe it as common. The second paradox is the simultaneous presence and absence of social polarization - the fact that while individuals experience attitude homogeneity in their interpersonal networks, their networks are characterized by attitude heterogeneity. These paradoxes give rise to numerous scholarly arguments. By developing a formal model of interpersonal influence over attitudes in a context where individuals hold simultaneous positions on multiple issues, we show why these arguments are not mutually exclusive and how they meaningfully refer to the same social setting. The results from this model provide a single parsimonious account for both paradoxes. The framework we develop may be generalized to a wider array of problems, including classic problems in collective action.",
    author = "Delia Baldassarri and Peter Bearman",
    year = "2007",
    month = "10",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "72",
    pages = "784--811",
    journal = "American Sociological Review",
    issn = "0003-1224",
    publisher = "American Sociological Association",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Dynamics of politcal polarization

    AU - Baldassarri, Delia

    AU - Bearman, Peter

    PY - 2007/10

    Y1 - 2007/10

    N2 - This article accounts for two puzzling paradoxes. The first paradox is the simultaneous absence and presence of attitude polarization - the fact that global attitude polarization is relatively rare, even though pundits describe it as common. The second paradox is the simultaneous presence and absence of social polarization - the fact that while individuals experience attitude homogeneity in their interpersonal networks, their networks are characterized by attitude heterogeneity. These paradoxes give rise to numerous scholarly arguments. By developing a formal model of interpersonal influence over attitudes in a context where individuals hold simultaneous positions on multiple issues, we show why these arguments are not mutually exclusive and how they meaningfully refer to the same social setting. The results from this model provide a single parsimonious account for both paradoxes. The framework we develop may be generalized to a wider array of problems, including classic problems in collective action.

    AB - This article accounts for two puzzling paradoxes. The first paradox is the simultaneous absence and presence of attitude polarization - the fact that global attitude polarization is relatively rare, even though pundits describe it as common. The second paradox is the simultaneous presence and absence of social polarization - the fact that while individuals experience attitude homogeneity in their interpersonal networks, their networks are characterized by attitude heterogeneity. These paradoxes give rise to numerous scholarly arguments. By developing a formal model of interpersonal influence over attitudes in a context where individuals hold simultaneous positions on multiple issues, we show why these arguments are not mutually exclusive and how they meaningfully refer to the same social setting. The results from this model provide a single parsimonious account for both paradoxes. The framework we develop may be generalized to a wider array of problems, including classic problems in collective action.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348956112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36348956112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:36348956112

    VL - 72

    SP - 784

    EP - 811

    JO - American Sociological Review

    JF - American Sociological Review

    SN - 0003-1224

    IS - 5

    ER -