Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models

Asya Shpiro, Rodica Curtu, John Rinzel, Nava Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Models implementing neuronal competition by reciprocally inhibitory populations are widely used to characterize bistable phenomena such as binocular rivalry. We find common dynamical behavior in several models of this general type, which differ in their architecture in the form of their gain functions, and in how they implement the slow process that underlies alternating dominance. We focus on examining the effect of the input strength on the rate (and existence) of oscillations. In spite of their differences, all considered models possess similar qualitative features, some of which we report here for the first time. Experimentally, dominance durations have been reported to decrease monotonically with increasing stimulus strength (such as Levelt's "Proposition IV"). The models predict this behavior; however, they also predict that at a lower range of input strength dominance durations increase with increasing stimulus strength. The nonmonotonic dependency of duration on stimulus strength is common to both deterministic and stochastic models. We conclude that additional experimental tests of Levelt's Proposition IV are needed to reconcile models and perception.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-473
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume97
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Population
Dependency (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models. / Shpiro, Asya; Curtu, Rodica; Rinzel, John; Rubin, Nava.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 97, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 462-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shpiro, Asya ; Curtu, Rodica ; Rinzel, John ; Rubin, Nava. / Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models. In: Journal of Neurophysiology. 2007 ; Vol. 97, No. 1. pp. 462-473.
@article{234e5e50bcd64f00a895d1f36cb995aa,
title = "Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models",
abstract = "Models implementing neuronal competition by reciprocally inhibitory populations are widely used to characterize bistable phenomena such as binocular rivalry. We find common dynamical behavior in several models of this general type, which differ in their architecture in the form of their gain functions, and in how they implement the slow process that underlies alternating dominance. We focus on examining the effect of the input strength on the rate (and existence) of oscillations. In spite of their differences, all considered models possess similar qualitative features, some of which we report here for the first time. Experimentally, dominance durations have been reported to decrease monotonically with increasing stimulus strength (such as Levelt's {"}Proposition IV{"}). The models predict this behavior; however, they also predict that at a lower range of input strength dominance durations increase with increasing stimulus strength. The nonmonotonic dependency of duration on stimulus strength is common to both deterministic and stochastic models. We conclude that additional experimental tests of Levelt's Proposition IV are needed to reconcile models and perception.",
author = "Asya Shpiro and Rodica Curtu and John Rinzel and Nava Rubin",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00604.2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "462--473",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models

AU - Shpiro, Asya

AU - Curtu, Rodica

AU - Rinzel, John

AU - Rubin, Nava

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Models implementing neuronal competition by reciprocally inhibitory populations are widely used to characterize bistable phenomena such as binocular rivalry. We find common dynamical behavior in several models of this general type, which differ in their architecture in the form of their gain functions, and in how they implement the slow process that underlies alternating dominance. We focus on examining the effect of the input strength on the rate (and existence) of oscillations. In spite of their differences, all considered models possess similar qualitative features, some of which we report here for the first time. Experimentally, dominance durations have been reported to decrease monotonically with increasing stimulus strength (such as Levelt's "Proposition IV"). The models predict this behavior; however, they also predict that at a lower range of input strength dominance durations increase with increasing stimulus strength. The nonmonotonic dependency of duration on stimulus strength is common to both deterministic and stochastic models. We conclude that additional experimental tests of Levelt's Proposition IV are needed to reconcile models and perception.

AB - Models implementing neuronal competition by reciprocally inhibitory populations are widely used to characterize bistable phenomena such as binocular rivalry. We find common dynamical behavior in several models of this general type, which differ in their architecture in the form of their gain functions, and in how they implement the slow process that underlies alternating dominance. We focus on examining the effect of the input strength on the rate (and existence) of oscillations. In spite of their differences, all considered models possess similar qualitative features, some of which we report here for the first time. Experimentally, dominance durations have been reported to decrease monotonically with increasing stimulus strength (such as Levelt's "Proposition IV"). The models predict this behavior; however, they also predict that at a lower range of input strength dominance durations increase with increasing stimulus strength. The nonmonotonic dependency of duration on stimulus strength is common to both deterministic and stochastic models. We conclude that additional experimental tests of Levelt's Proposition IV are needed to reconcile models and perception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846455499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846455499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00604.2006

DO - 10.1152/jn.00604.2006

M3 - Article

C2 - 17065254

AN - SCOPUS:33846455499

VL - 97

SP - 462

EP - 473

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 1

ER -