Duality-Derived Transformer Models for Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Transients - Part II: Complementary Modeling Guidelines

S. Jazebi, A. Rezaei-Zare, M. Lambert, S. E. Zirka, N. Chiesa, Y. I. Moroz, X. Chen, M. Martinez-Duro, C. M. Arturi, E. P. Dick, A. Narang, R. A. Walling, J. Mahseredjian, J. A. Martinez, Francisco De Leon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This two-part paper is intended to clarify definitions in dual transformer modeling that are vague, provide accurate modeling guidelines, clarify misconceptions about numerical instability, provide a unified dual model for a specific type of transformer, and introduce new paths of research to the power systems/electrical machinery community for low-frequency transients. Part I discussed the topology of duality-based models and some important issues, such as the most common approaches to derive dual models and their variety, the equivalence of negative inductance and mutual couplings to represent the leakage inductance of three-winding transformers, and the numerical oscillations caused by the use of nontopological models. This part of the paper discusses and compares white-, gray-, and black-box models. The paper also reviews hysteresis models (static and dynamic) and highlights the differences between the air-core inductance and saturation inductance. The available dual models for the representation of the transformer tank are then presented. A unified and accurate model of a three-phase core-type transformer adequate for all low-frequency transients is presented. Finally, concrete guidelines are presented for the appropriate selection of the model topology and parameters for different low-frequency transient studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7458170
Pages (from-to)2420-2430
Number of pages11
JournalIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Inductance
Topology
Transformer windings
Machinery
Hysteresis
Concretes
Air

Keywords

  • Duality models
  • electromagnetic transients
  • modeling guidelines
  • tank models
  • transformer modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Duality-Derived Transformer Models for Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Transients - Part II : Complementary Modeling Guidelines. / Jazebi, S.; Rezaei-Zare, A.; Lambert, M.; Zirka, S. E.; Chiesa, N.; Moroz, Y. I.; Chen, X.; Martinez-Duro, M.; Arturi, C. M.; Dick, E. P.; Narang, A.; Walling, R. A.; Mahseredjian, J.; Martinez, J. A.; De Leon, Francisco.

In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 31, No. 5, 7458170, 01.10.2016, p. 2420-2430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jazebi, S, Rezaei-Zare, A, Lambert, M, Zirka, SE, Chiesa, N, Moroz, YI, Chen, X, Martinez-Duro, M, Arturi, CM, Dick, EP, Narang, A, Walling, RA, Mahseredjian, J, Martinez, JA & De Leon, F 2016, 'Duality-Derived Transformer Models for Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Transients - Part II: Complementary Modeling Guidelines', IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 31, no. 5, 7458170, pp. 2420-2430. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2556686
Jazebi, S. ; Rezaei-Zare, A. ; Lambert, M. ; Zirka, S. E. ; Chiesa, N. ; Moroz, Y. I. ; Chen, X. ; Martinez-Duro, M. ; Arturi, C. M. ; Dick, E. P. ; Narang, A. ; Walling, R. A. ; Mahseredjian, J. ; Martinez, J. A. ; De Leon, Francisco. / Duality-Derived Transformer Models for Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Transients - Part II : Complementary Modeling Guidelines. In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 2420-2430.
@article{d7418e5b0e9044a8a77f5c6ff6512f03,
title = "Duality-Derived Transformer Models for Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Transients - Part II: Complementary Modeling Guidelines",
abstract = "This two-part paper is intended to clarify definitions in dual transformer modeling that are vague, provide accurate modeling guidelines, clarify misconceptions about numerical instability, provide a unified dual model for a specific type of transformer, and introduce new paths of research to the power systems/electrical machinery community for low-frequency transients. Part I discussed the topology of duality-based models and some important issues, such as the most common approaches to derive dual models and their variety, the equivalence of negative inductance and mutual couplings to represent the leakage inductance of three-winding transformers, and the numerical oscillations caused by the use of nontopological models. This part of the paper discusses and compares white-, gray-, and black-box models. The paper also reviews hysteresis models (static and dynamic) and highlights the differences between the air-core inductance and saturation inductance. The available dual models for the representation of the transformer tank are then presented. A unified and accurate model of a three-phase core-type transformer adequate for all low-frequency transients is presented. Finally, concrete guidelines are presented for the appropriate selection of the model topology and parameters for different low-frequency transient studies.",
keywords = "Duality models, electromagnetic transients, modeling guidelines, tank models, transformer modeling",
author = "S. Jazebi and A. Rezaei-Zare and M. Lambert and Zirka, {S. E.} and N. Chiesa and Moroz, {Y. I.} and X. Chen and M. Martinez-Duro and Arturi, {C. M.} and Dick, {E. P.} and A. Narang and Walling, {R. A.} and J. Mahseredjian and Martinez, {J. A.} and {De Leon}, Francisco",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2556686",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "2420--2430",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery",
issn = "0885-8977",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Duality-Derived Transformer Models for Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Transients - Part II

T2 - Complementary Modeling Guidelines

AU - Jazebi, S.

AU - Rezaei-Zare, A.

AU - Lambert, M.

AU - Zirka, S. E.

AU - Chiesa, N.

AU - Moroz, Y. I.

AU - Chen, X.

AU - Martinez-Duro, M.

AU - Arturi, C. M.

AU - Dick, E. P.

AU - Narang, A.

AU - Walling, R. A.

AU - Mahseredjian, J.

AU - Martinez, J. A.

AU - De Leon, Francisco

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - This two-part paper is intended to clarify definitions in dual transformer modeling that are vague, provide accurate modeling guidelines, clarify misconceptions about numerical instability, provide a unified dual model for a specific type of transformer, and introduce new paths of research to the power systems/electrical machinery community for low-frequency transients. Part I discussed the topology of duality-based models and some important issues, such as the most common approaches to derive dual models and their variety, the equivalence of negative inductance and mutual couplings to represent the leakage inductance of three-winding transformers, and the numerical oscillations caused by the use of nontopological models. This part of the paper discusses and compares white-, gray-, and black-box models. The paper also reviews hysteresis models (static and dynamic) and highlights the differences between the air-core inductance and saturation inductance. The available dual models for the representation of the transformer tank are then presented. A unified and accurate model of a three-phase core-type transformer adequate for all low-frequency transients is presented. Finally, concrete guidelines are presented for the appropriate selection of the model topology and parameters for different low-frequency transient studies.

AB - This two-part paper is intended to clarify definitions in dual transformer modeling that are vague, provide accurate modeling guidelines, clarify misconceptions about numerical instability, provide a unified dual model for a specific type of transformer, and introduce new paths of research to the power systems/electrical machinery community for low-frequency transients. Part I discussed the topology of duality-based models and some important issues, such as the most common approaches to derive dual models and their variety, the equivalence of negative inductance and mutual couplings to represent the leakage inductance of three-winding transformers, and the numerical oscillations caused by the use of nontopological models. This part of the paper discusses and compares white-, gray-, and black-box models. The paper also reviews hysteresis models (static and dynamic) and highlights the differences between the air-core inductance and saturation inductance. The available dual models for the representation of the transformer tank are then presented. A unified and accurate model of a three-phase core-type transformer adequate for all low-frequency transients is presented. Finally, concrete guidelines are presented for the appropriate selection of the model topology and parameters for different low-frequency transient studies.

KW - Duality models

KW - electromagnetic transients

KW - modeling guidelines

KW - tank models

KW - transformer modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990247576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990247576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2556686

DO - 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2556686

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990247576

VL - 31

SP - 2420

EP - 2430

JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

SN - 0885-8977

IS - 5

M1 - 7458170

ER -