Doom and gloom versus optimism: An assessment of ocean-related U.S. science journalism (2001-2015)

Lisa N. Johns, Jennifer Jacquet

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In recent years, some scientists have expressed concern about the negative representation of the state of the oceans in the media. To examine this concern empirically, we analyzed the content of 169 articles in mainstream U.S. newspapers covering ocean-related research between 2001 and 2015. Content was categorized according to main issue, basis of evidence, causal attribution, presence of solutions and uncertainty, and coded for doom and gloom and optimistic language. Science journalism about ocean issues most commonly addressed climate change and the status of ocean species or populations. The majority of articles cited peer-reviewed research. Most articles attributed change to anthropogenic causes, although ocean science articles addressing climate change were less likely to do so. Uncertain language and solutions were observed in nearly half of all articles. Optimistic language outnumbered doom and gloom language across all categories. While doom and gloom language was identified in 10% of all articles, optimistic language was present in 27%.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)142-148
    Number of pages7
    JournalGlobal Environmental Change
    Volume50
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    science journalism
    optimism
    ocean
    language
    climate change
    attribution
    science
    newspaper
    uncertainty
    cause

    Keywords

    • calamities
    • doom and gloom
    • media content analysis
    • oceans
    • optimism

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Global and Planetary Change
    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Ecology
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

    Cite this

    Doom and gloom versus optimism : An assessment of ocean-related U.S. science journalism (2001-2015). / Johns, Lisa N.; Jacquet, Jennifer.

    In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 50, 01.05.2018, p. 142-148.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{4c3671f40ef54bfd94f931e82e46a34c,
    title = "Doom and gloom versus optimism: An assessment of ocean-related U.S. science journalism (2001-2015)",
    abstract = "In recent years, some scientists have expressed concern about the negative representation of the state of the oceans in the media. To examine this concern empirically, we analyzed the content of 169 articles in mainstream U.S. newspapers covering ocean-related research between 2001 and 2015. Content was categorized according to main issue, basis of evidence, causal attribution, presence of solutions and uncertainty, and coded for doom and gloom and optimistic language. Science journalism about ocean issues most commonly addressed climate change and the status of ocean species or populations. The majority of articles cited peer-reviewed research. Most articles attributed change to anthropogenic causes, although ocean science articles addressing climate change were less likely to do so. Uncertain language and solutions were observed in nearly half of all articles. Optimistic language outnumbered doom and gloom language across all categories. While doom and gloom language was identified in 10{\%} of all articles, optimistic language was present in 27{\%}.",
    keywords = "calamities, doom and gloom, media content analysis, oceans, optimism",
    author = "Johns, {Lisa N.} and Jennifer Jacquet",
    year = "2018",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "50",
    pages = "142--148",
    journal = "Global Environmental Change",
    issn = "0959-3780",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Doom and gloom versus optimism

    T2 - An assessment of ocean-related U.S. science journalism (2001-2015)

    AU - Johns, Lisa N.

    AU - Jacquet, Jennifer

    PY - 2018/5/1

    Y1 - 2018/5/1

    N2 - In recent years, some scientists have expressed concern about the negative representation of the state of the oceans in the media. To examine this concern empirically, we analyzed the content of 169 articles in mainstream U.S. newspapers covering ocean-related research between 2001 and 2015. Content was categorized according to main issue, basis of evidence, causal attribution, presence of solutions and uncertainty, and coded for doom and gloom and optimistic language. Science journalism about ocean issues most commonly addressed climate change and the status of ocean species or populations. The majority of articles cited peer-reviewed research. Most articles attributed change to anthropogenic causes, although ocean science articles addressing climate change were less likely to do so. Uncertain language and solutions were observed in nearly half of all articles. Optimistic language outnumbered doom and gloom language across all categories. While doom and gloom language was identified in 10% of all articles, optimistic language was present in 27%.

    AB - In recent years, some scientists have expressed concern about the negative representation of the state of the oceans in the media. To examine this concern empirically, we analyzed the content of 169 articles in mainstream U.S. newspapers covering ocean-related research between 2001 and 2015. Content was categorized according to main issue, basis of evidence, causal attribution, presence of solutions and uncertainty, and coded for doom and gloom and optimistic language. Science journalism about ocean issues most commonly addressed climate change and the status of ocean species or populations. The majority of articles cited peer-reviewed research. Most articles attributed change to anthropogenic causes, although ocean science articles addressing climate change were less likely to do so. Uncertain language and solutions were observed in nearly half of all articles. Optimistic language outnumbered doom and gloom language across all categories. While doom and gloom language was identified in 10% of all articles, optimistic language was present in 27%.

    KW - calamities

    KW - doom and gloom

    KW - media content analysis

    KW - oceans

    KW - optimism

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045035782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045035782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 50

    SP - 142

    EP - 148

    JO - Global Environmental Change

    JF - Global Environmental Change

    SN - 0959-3780

    ER -