Don't Know What You Got: A Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Neuroticism and Nonresponse

Jonathan D. Klingler, Gary E. Hollibaugh, Adam Ramey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Individuals who are more sensitive to negative outcomes from error are more likely to provide nonresponses in surveys. We argue Neurotics' sensitivity to negative outcomes leads them to avoid gathering costly information and forming/reporting opinions about stimuli. Using data from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we show Neuroticism is strongly and positively associated with NA/DK responses when placing politicians on a seven-point ideological scale. We then introduce to political science a Bayesian hierarchical model that allows nonresponse to be generated by both a lack of information as well as disincentives for response. Using this model, we show that the NA/DK responses in these data are due to inhibited information collection and indecision from error avoidance by Neurotics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-569
Number of pages21
JournalPolitical Science Research and Methods
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

response behavior
neuroticism
information collection
election research
political science
politician
stimulus
lack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Don't Know What You Got : A Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Neuroticism and Nonresponse. / Klingler, Jonathan D.; Hollibaugh, Gary E.; Ramey, Adam.

In: Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. 549-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8bdd6d4274cf4c74863d9f0728c3e9ce,
title = "Don't Know What You Got: A Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Neuroticism and Nonresponse",
abstract = "Individuals who are more sensitive to negative outcomes from error are more likely to provide nonresponses in surveys. We argue Neurotics' sensitivity to negative outcomes leads them to avoid gathering costly information and forming/reporting opinions about stimuli. Using data from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we show Neuroticism is strongly and positively associated with NA/DK responses when placing politicians on a seven-point ideological scale. We then introduce to political science a Bayesian hierarchical model that allows nonresponse to be generated by both a lack of information as well as disincentives for response. Using this model, we show that the NA/DK responses in these data are due to inhibited information collection and indecision from error avoidance by Neurotics.",
author = "Klingler, {Jonathan D.} and Hollibaugh, {Gary E.} and Adam Ramey",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/psrm.2016.50",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "549--569",
journal = "Political Science Research and Methods",
issn = "2049-8470",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Don't Know What You Got

T2 - A Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Neuroticism and Nonresponse

AU - Klingler, Jonathan D.

AU - Hollibaugh, Gary E.

AU - Ramey, Adam

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Individuals who are more sensitive to negative outcomes from error are more likely to provide nonresponses in surveys. We argue Neurotics' sensitivity to negative outcomes leads them to avoid gathering costly information and forming/reporting opinions about stimuli. Using data from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we show Neuroticism is strongly and positively associated with NA/DK responses when placing politicians on a seven-point ideological scale. We then introduce to political science a Bayesian hierarchical model that allows nonresponse to be generated by both a lack of information as well as disincentives for response. Using this model, we show that the NA/DK responses in these data are due to inhibited information collection and indecision from error avoidance by Neurotics.

AB - Individuals who are more sensitive to negative outcomes from error are more likely to provide nonresponses in surveys. We argue Neurotics' sensitivity to negative outcomes leads them to avoid gathering costly information and forming/reporting opinions about stimuli. Using data from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we show Neuroticism is strongly and positively associated with NA/DK responses when placing politicians on a seven-point ideological scale. We then introduce to political science a Bayesian hierarchical model that allows nonresponse to be generated by both a lack of information as well as disincentives for response. Using this model, we show that the NA/DK responses in these data are due to inhibited information collection and indecision from error avoidance by Neurotics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050989263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050989263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/psrm.2016.50

DO - 10.1017/psrm.2016.50

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050989263

VL - 6

SP - 549

EP - 569

JO - Political Science Research and Methods

JF - Political Science Research and Methods

SN - 2049-8470

IS - 3

ER -