Does Social Work Need the Eco-Systems Perspective? Part 1. Is the Perspective Clinically Useful?

Jerome C. Wakefield

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This is the first part of a two-part article in which I analyze the arguments for the ecosystems perspective. In Part 1, I consider four arguments for the clinical usefulness of the perspective: (1) it helps the clinician to identify circular causal connections, or "transactions," between persons and environments; (2) it helps in formulating a comprehensive assessment; (3) it integrates other social work theories; and (4) it corrects clinical biases toward individualistic therapeutic intervention. A close examination of these arguments demonstrates that they are invalid and that the claimed clinical usefulness of the perspective is an illusion. The clinical benefits can, in fact, come only from the use of substantive, domain-specific theories.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalSocial Service Review
    Volume70
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

    Fingerprint

    social work
    transaction
    examination
    human being
    trend

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Does Social Work Need the Eco-Systems Perspective? Part 1. Is the Perspective Clinically Useful? / Wakefield, Jerome C.

    In: Social Service Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, 01.01.1996.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{1ed08216094f40f68ed9012ad833a19f,
    title = "Does Social Work Need the Eco-Systems Perspective? Part 1. Is the Perspective Clinically Useful?",
    abstract = "This is the first part of a two-part article in which I analyze the arguments for the ecosystems perspective. In Part 1, I consider four arguments for the clinical usefulness of the perspective: (1) it helps the clinician to identify circular causal connections, or {"}transactions,{"} between persons and environments; (2) it helps in formulating a comprehensive assessment; (3) it integrates other social work theories; and (4) it corrects clinical biases toward individualistic therapeutic intervention. A close examination of these arguments demonstrates that they are invalid and that the claimed clinical usefulness of the perspective is an illusion. The clinical benefits can, in fact, come only from the use of substantive, domain-specific theories.",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.}",
    year = "1996",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1086/604163",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "70",
    journal = "Social Service Review",
    issn = "0037-7961",
    publisher = "University of Chicago",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Does Social Work Need the Eco-Systems Perspective? Part 1. Is the Perspective Clinically Useful?

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    PY - 1996/1/1

    Y1 - 1996/1/1

    N2 - This is the first part of a two-part article in which I analyze the arguments for the ecosystems perspective. In Part 1, I consider four arguments for the clinical usefulness of the perspective: (1) it helps the clinician to identify circular causal connections, or "transactions," between persons and environments; (2) it helps in formulating a comprehensive assessment; (3) it integrates other social work theories; and (4) it corrects clinical biases toward individualistic therapeutic intervention. A close examination of these arguments demonstrates that they are invalid and that the claimed clinical usefulness of the perspective is an illusion. The clinical benefits can, in fact, come only from the use of substantive, domain-specific theories.

    AB - This is the first part of a two-part article in which I analyze the arguments for the ecosystems perspective. In Part 1, I consider four arguments for the clinical usefulness of the perspective: (1) it helps the clinician to identify circular causal connections, or "transactions," between persons and environments; (2) it helps in formulating a comprehensive assessment; (3) it integrates other social work theories; and (4) it corrects clinical biases toward individualistic therapeutic intervention. A close examination of these arguments demonstrates that they are invalid and that the claimed clinical usefulness of the perspective is an illusion. The clinical benefits can, in fact, come only from the use of substantive, domain-specific theories.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542533571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542533571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/604163

    DO - 10.1086/604163

    M3 - Article

    VL - 70

    JO - Social Service Review

    JF - Social Service Review

    SN - 0037-7961

    IS - 1

    ER -