Abstract
U.S. public schools are often criticized as overly bureaucratic: administration is said to consume too great a share of educational resources, to the detriment of educational productivity. Despite this common assertion, remarkably little is known about the resource allocation patterns of school districts, how these vary across districts, and how they have changed over time. This paper presents some evidence on resource allocation in New York state, using a panel of school districts, 1978-87. The paper then attempts to determine if there is any evidence at the district level of a systematic relationship between administrative inputs and educational output in the form of standardized test scores. A variety of statistical models is shown to yield inconsistent results, providing weak support for the contention that administrative resources are necessarily detrimental to educational productivity.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111-124 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Economics of Education Review |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1996 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- Education
Cite this
Does more school district administration lower educational productivity? Some evidence on the "administrative blob" in New York public schools. / Brewer, Dominic J.
In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 04.1996, p. 111-124.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does more school district administration lower educational productivity? Some evidence on the "administrative blob" in New York public schools
AU - Brewer, Dominic J.
PY - 1996/4
Y1 - 1996/4
N2 - U.S. public schools are often criticized as overly bureaucratic: administration is said to consume too great a share of educational resources, to the detriment of educational productivity. Despite this common assertion, remarkably little is known about the resource allocation patterns of school districts, how these vary across districts, and how they have changed over time. This paper presents some evidence on resource allocation in New York state, using a panel of school districts, 1978-87. The paper then attempts to determine if there is any evidence at the district level of a systematic relationship between administrative inputs and educational output in the form of standardized test scores. A variety of statistical models is shown to yield inconsistent results, providing weak support for the contention that administrative resources are necessarily detrimental to educational productivity.
AB - U.S. public schools are often criticized as overly bureaucratic: administration is said to consume too great a share of educational resources, to the detriment of educational productivity. Despite this common assertion, remarkably little is known about the resource allocation patterns of school districts, how these vary across districts, and how they have changed over time. This paper presents some evidence on resource allocation in New York state, using a panel of school districts, 1978-87. The paper then attempts to determine if there is any evidence at the district level of a systematic relationship between administrative inputs and educational output in the form of standardized test scores. A variety of statistical models is shown to yield inconsistent results, providing weak support for the contention that administrative resources are necessarily detrimental to educational productivity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004615272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0004615272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0272-7757(95)00032-1
DO - 10.1016/0272-7757(95)00032-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0004615272
VL - 15
SP - 111
EP - 124
JO - Economics of Education Review
JF - Economics of Education Review
SN - 0272-7757
IS - 2
ER -