Does implicit voice learning improve spoken language processing? Implications for clinical practice

Julie Case, Scott Seyfarth, Susannah Levi

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Purpose: In typical interactions with other speakers, including a clinical environment, listeners become familiar with voices through implicit learning. Previous studies have found evidence for a Familiar Talker Advantage (better speech perception and spoken language processing for familiar voices) following explicit voice learning. The current study examined whether a Familiar Talker Advantage would result from implicit voice learning. Method: Thirty-three adults and 16 second graders were familiarized with 1 of 2 talkers’ voices over 2 days through live interactions as 1 of 2 experimenters administered standardized tests and interacted with the listeners. To assess whether this implicit voice learning would generate a Familiar Talker Advantage, listeners completed a baseline sentence recognition task and a post-learning sentence recognition task with both the familiar talker and the unfamiliar talker. Results: No significant effect of voice familiarity was found for either the children or the adults following implicit voice learning. Effect size estimates suggest that familiarity with the voice may benefit some listeners, despite the lack of an overall effect of familiarity. Discussion: We discuss possible clinical implications of this finding and directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1251-1260
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume61
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

spoken language
Language
Learning
listener
learning
interaction
Spoken Language Processing
Clinical Practice
Speech Perception
Talkers
lack
Recognition (Psychology)
evidence
Listeners

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Does implicit voice learning improve spoken language processing? Implications for clinical practice. / Case, Julie; Seyfarth, Scott; Levi, Susannah.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 61, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 1251-1260.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{773d205992064329b45b014408d45f35,
title = "Does implicit voice learning improve spoken language processing? Implications for clinical practice",
abstract = "Purpose: In typical interactions with other speakers, including a clinical environment, listeners become familiar with voices through implicit learning. Previous studies have found evidence for a Familiar Talker Advantage (better speech perception and spoken language processing for familiar voices) following explicit voice learning. The current study examined whether a Familiar Talker Advantage would result from implicit voice learning. Method: Thirty-three adults and 16 second graders were familiarized with 1 of 2 talkers’ voices over 2 days through live interactions as 1 of 2 experimenters administered standardized tests and interacted with the listeners. To assess whether this implicit voice learning would generate a Familiar Talker Advantage, listeners completed a baseline sentence recognition task and a post-learning sentence recognition task with both the familiar talker and the unfamiliar talker. Results: No significant effect of voice familiarity was found for either the children or the adults following implicit voice learning. Effect size estimates suggest that familiarity with the voice may benefit some listeners, despite the lack of an overall effect of familiarity. Discussion: We discuss possible clinical implications of this finding and directions for future research.",
author = "Julie Case and Scott Seyfarth and Susannah Levi",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0298",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1251--1260",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does implicit voice learning improve spoken language processing? Implications for clinical practice

AU - Case, Julie

AU - Seyfarth, Scott

AU - Levi, Susannah

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Purpose: In typical interactions with other speakers, including a clinical environment, listeners become familiar with voices through implicit learning. Previous studies have found evidence for a Familiar Talker Advantage (better speech perception and spoken language processing for familiar voices) following explicit voice learning. The current study examined whether a Familiar Talker Advantage would result from implicit voice learning. Method: Thirty-three adults and 16 second graders were familiarized with 1 of 2 talkers’ voices over 2 days through live interactions as 1 of 2 experimenters administered standardized tests and interacted with the listeners. To assess whether this implicit voice learning would generate a Familiar Talker Advantage, listeners completed a baseline sentence recognition task and a post-learning sentence recognition task with both the familiar talker and the unfamiliar talker. Results: No significant effect of voice familiarity was found for either the children or the adults following implicit voice learning. Effect size estimates suggest that familiarity with the voice may benefit some listeners, despite the lack of an overall effect of familiarity. Discussion: We discuss possible clinical implications of this finding and directions for future research.

AB - Purpose: In typical interactions with other speakers, including a clinical environment, listeners become familiar with voices through implicit learning. Previous studies have found evidence for a Familiar Talker Advantage (better speech perception and spoken language processing for familiar voices) following explicit voice learning. The current study examined whether a Familiar Talker Advantage would result from implicit voice learning. Method: Thirty-three adults and 16 second graders were familiarized with 1 of 2 talkers’ voices over 2 days through live interactions as 1 of 2 experimenters administered standardized tests and interacted with the listeners. To assess whether this implicit voice learning would generate a Familiar Talker Advantage, listeners completed a baseline sentence recognition task and a post-learning sentence recognition task with both the familiar talker and the unfamiliar talker. Results: No significant effect of voice familiarity was found for either the children or the adults following implicit voice learning. Effect size estimates suggest that familiarity with the voice may benefit some listeners, despite the lack of an overall effect of familiarity. Discussion: We discuss possible clinical implications of this finding and directions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047270577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047270577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0298

DO - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0298

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 29800358

AN - SCOPUS:85047270577

VL - 61

SP - 1251

EP - 1260

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 5

ER -