Does category labeling lead to forgetting?

Nathaniel Blanco, Todd Gureckis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What effect does labeling an object as a member of a familiar category have on memory for that object? Recent studies suggest that recognition memory can be negatively impacted by categorizing objects during encoding. This paper examines the "representational shift hypothesis" which argues that categorizing an object impairs recognition memory by altering the trace of the encoded memory to be more similar to the category prototype. Previous evidence for this idea comes from experiments in which a basic-level category labeling task was compared to a non-category labeling incidental encoding task, usually a preference judgment (e.g., "Do you like this item?"). In two experiments, we examine alternative tasks that attempt to control for processing demands and the degree to which category information is explicitly recruited at the time of study. Contrary to the predictions of the representational shift hypothesis, we find no evidence that memory is selectively impaired by category labeling. Overall, the pattern of results across both studies appears consistent with well-established variables known to influence memory such as encoding specificity and distinctiveness effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-79
Number of pages7
JournalCognitive Processing
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Labeling
Data storage equipment
Time and Motion Studies
Object recognition
Experiments
Processing
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Categorization
  • Labeling
  • Memory
  • Schema encoding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Does category labeling lead to forgetting? / Blanco, Nathaniel; Gureckis, Todd.

In: Cognitive Processing, Vol. 14, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 73-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blanco, Nathaniel ; Gureckis, Todd. / Does category labeling lead to forgetting?. In: Cognitive Processing. 2013 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 73-79.
@article{cd02b7eb8de441b1a9f2d096f8cf4168,
title = "Does category labeling lead to forgetting?",
abstract = "What effect does labeling an object as a member of a familiar category have on memory for that object? Recent studies suggest that recognition memory can be negatively impacted by categorizing objects during encoding. This paper examines the {"}representational shift hypothesis{"} which argues that categorizing an object impairs recognition memory by altering the trace of the encoded memory to be more similar to the category prototype. Previous evidence for this idea comes from experiments in which a basic-level category labeling task was compared to a non-category labeling incidental encoding task, usually a preference judgment (e.g., {"}Do you like this item?{"}). In two experiments, we examine alternative tasks that attempt to control for processing demands and the degree to which category information is explicitly recruited at the time of study. Contrary to the predictions of the representational shift hypothesis, we find no evidence that memory is selectively impaired by category labeling. Overall, the pattern of results across both studies appears consistent with well-established variables known to influence memory such as encoding specificity and distinctiveness effects.",
keywords = "Categorization, Labeling, Memory, Schema encoding",
author = "Nathaniel Blanco and Todd Gureckis",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10339-012-0530-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "73--79",
journal = "Cognitive Processing",
issn = "1612-4782",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does category labeling lead to forgetting?

AU - Blanco, Nathaniel

AU - Gureckis, Todd

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - What effect does labeling an object as a member of a familiar category have on memory for that object? Recent studies suggest that recognition memory can be negatively impacted by categorizing objects during encoding. This paper examines the "representational shift hypothesis" which argues that categorizing an object impairs recognition memory by altering the trace of the encoded memory to be more similar to the category prototype. Previous evidence for this idea comes from experiments in which a basic-level category labeling task was compared to a non-category labeling incidental encoding task, usually a preference judgment (e.g., "Do you like this item?"). In two experiments, we examine alternative tasks that attempt to control for processing demands and the degree to which category information is explicitly recruited at the time of study. Contrary to the predictions of the representational shift hypothesis, we find no evidence that memory is selectively impaired by category labeling. Overall, the pattern of results across both studies appears consistent with well-established variables known to influence memory such as encoding specificity and distinctiveness effects.

AB - What effect does labeling an object as a member of a familiar category have on memory for that object? Recent studies suggest that recognition memory can be negatively impacted by categorizing objects during encoding. This paper examines the "representational shift hypothesis" which argues that categorizing an object impairs recognition memory by altering the trace of the encoded memory to be more similar to the category prototype. Previous evidence for this idea comes from experiments in which a basic-level category labeling task was compared to a non-category labeling incidental encoding task, usually a preference judgment (e.g., "Do you like this item?"). In two experiments, we examine alternative tasks that attempt to control for processing demands and the degree to which category information is explicitly recruited at the time of study. Contrary to the predictions of the representational shift hypothesis, we find no evidence that memory is selectively impaired by category labeling. Overall, the pattern of results across both studies appears consistent with well-established variables known to influence memory such as encoding specificity and distinctiveness effects.

KW - Categorization

KW - Labeling

KW - Memory

KW - Schema encoding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874253567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874253567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10339-012-0530-4

DO - 10.1007/s10339-012-0530-4

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 73

EP - 79

JO - Cognitive Processing

JF - Cognitive Processing

SN - 1612-4782

IS - 1

ER -