Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, Does feminization reduce pay, and How can we tell with longitudinal data?

Paula England, Paul Allison, Yuxiao Wu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Predominantly female occupations pay less than "male" occupations, even after adjusting for skill demands. The devaluation perspective says that this is because gender bias influences employers' decisions about the relative pay of occupations. The longitudinal implication of the devaluation perspective is that when occupations feminize, their relative pay should go down. In the queueing or relative-attractiveness view, occupations' reward levels affect their sex composition, with less attractive occupations going to women because employers prefer men and can get them in occupations that pay well. To test these views about change over time, we use a fixed-effects model with lagged independent variables and data from the 1983-2001 Current Population Surveys. There is only slight evidence that the feminization of occupations lowers their wages, and no evidence that a fall in occupations' relative wages leads to feminization. But percent female is associated with lower wages in every year. We speculate that in the early history of new occupations and organizations, there was a causal relationship between gender composition and wages, and it has been frozen in by institutional inertia in relative wage structures.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1237-1256
    Number of pages20
    JournalSocial Science Research
    Volume36
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2007

    Fingerprint

    occupation
    cause
    wage
    devaluation
    low wage
    employer
    new occupations
    gender
    social attraction
    evidence
    reward
    trend
    history

    Keywords

    • Discrimination
    • Earnings
    • Gender
    • Gender inequality
    • Longitudinal analysis
    • Occupations

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, Does feminization reduce pay, and How can we tell with longitudinal data? / England, Paula; Allison, Paul; Wu, Yuxiao.

    In: Social Science Research, Vol. 36, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 1237-1256.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e96a84ed81dd4395b26b328a75c26dc2,
    title = "Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, Does feminization reduce pay, and How can we tell with longitudinal data?",
    abstract = "Predominantly female occupations pay less than {"}male{"} occupations, even after adjusting for skill demands. The devaluation perspective says that this is because gender bias influences employers' decisions about the relative pay of occupations. The longitudinal implication of the devaluation perspective is that when occupations feminize, their relative pay should go down. In the queueing or relative-attractiveness view, occupations' reward levels affect their sex composition, with less attractive occupations going to women because employers prefer men and can get them in occupations that pay well. To test these views about change over time, we use a fixed-effects model with lagged independent variables and data from the 1983-2001 Current Population Surveys. There is only slight evidence that the feminization of occupations lowers their wages, and no evidence that a fall in occupations' relative wages leads to feminization. But percent female is associated with lower wages in every year. We speculate that in the early history of new occupations and organizations, there was a causal relationship between gender composition and wages, and it has been frozen in by institutional inertia in relative wage structures.",
    keywords = "Discrimination, Earnings, Gender, Gender inequality, Longitudinal analysis, Occupations",
    author = "Paula England and Paul Allison and Yuxiao Wu",
    year = "2007",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.08.003",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "1237--1256",
    journal = "Social Science Research",
    issn = "0049-089X",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, Does feminization reduce pay, and How can we tell with longitudinal data?

    AU - England, Paula

    AU - Allison, Paul

    AU - Wu, Yuxiao

    PY - 2007/9

    Y1 - 2007/9

    N2 - Predominantly female occupations pay less than "male" occupations, even after adjusting for skill demands. The devaluation perspective says that this is because gender bias influences employers' decisions about the relative pay of occupations. The longitudinal implication of the devaluation perspective is that when occupations feminize, their relative pay should go down. In the queueing or relative-attractiveness view, occupations' reward levels affect their sex composition, with less attractive occupations going to women because employers prefer men and can get them in occupations that pay well. To test these views about change over time, we use a fixed-effects model with lagged independent variables and data from the 1983-2001 Current Population Surveys. There is only slight evidence that the feminization of occupations lowers their wages, and no evidence that a fall in occupations' relative wages leads to feminization. But percent female is associated with lower wages in every year. We speculate that in the early history of new occupations and organizations, there was a causal relationship between gender composition and wages, and it has been frozen in by institutional inertia in relative wage structures.

    AB - Predominantly female occupations pay less than "male" occupations, even after adjusting for skill demands. The devaluation perspective says that this is because gender bias influences employers' decisions about the relative pay of occupations. The longitudinal implication of the devaluation perspective is that when occupations feminize, their relative pay should go down. In the queueing or relative-attractiveness view, occupations' reward levels affect their sex composition, with less attractive occupations going to women because employers prefer men and can get them in occupations that pay well. To test these views about change over time, we use a fixed-effects model with lagged independent variables and data from the 1983-2001 Current Population Surveys. There is only slight evidence that the feminization of occupations lowers their wages, and no evidence that a fall in occupations' relative wages leads to feminization. But percent female is associated with lower wages in every year. We speculate that in the early history of new occupations and organizations, there was a causal relationship between gender composition and wages, and it has been frozen in by institutional inertia in relative wage structures.

    KW - Discrimination

    KW - Earnings

    KW - Gender

    KW - Gender inequality

    KW - Longitudinal analysis

    KW - Occupations

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447514289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447514289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.08.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.08.003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 1237

    EP - 1256

    JO - Social Science Research

    JF - Social Science Research

    SN - 0049-089X

    IS - 3

    ER -