Do Signals Have Politics? Inscribing Abilities in Cochlear Implants

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This article discusses autoexperiments, field notes, and laboratory tests on the hardware and software of cochlear implants. Electroacoustic devices resist seeing-through. Yet in the case of cochlear implants, the desires of early users, the conflicting demands of mainstream medicine and economics, and the mediated features of electrical listening, the politics attendant upon communication can be found embedded in the design of electroacoustic objects. Many bioethicists have taken up the Deaf culture or linguistic minority critique of implantation, which situates this technology in the long history of eugenicist attempts to promote oralism through the medical eradication of deafness and through pedagogical bans on sign language. Despite the prominence of the cochlear implant in disability studies, bioethics, and science fiction, however, this has inspired little research in science and technology studies (STS).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199940691
ISBN (Print)9780195388947
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 21 2012

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implant
Electroacoustics
Sign Language
Economics
Medicine
Eradication
Linguistic Minorities
Eugenicists
Software
Field Notes
Deafness
Bioethics
Communication
History
Hardware
Deaf Culture
Science Fiction
Disability Studies
Implantation

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Cochlear implants
  • Deaf culture
  • Electroacoustic objects
  • Oralism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Do Signals Have Politics? Inscribing Abilities in Cochlear Implants. / Mills, Mara.

The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Mills, Mara. / Do Signals Have Politics? Inscribing Abilities in Cochlear Implants. The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{bcf8a37ca3f04d5ea4a44e817a320927,
title = "Do Signals Have Politics? Inscribing Abilities in Cochlear Implants",
abstract = "This article discusses autoexperiments, field notes, and laboratory tests on the hardware and software of cochlear implants. Electroacoustic devices resist seeing-through. Yet in the case of cochlear implants, the desires of early users, the conflicting demands of mainstream medicine and economics, and the mediated features of electrical listening, the politics attendant upon communication can be found embedded in the design of electroacoustic objects. Many bioethicists have taken up the Deaf culture or linguistic minority critique of implantation, which situates this technology in the long history of eugenicist attempts to promote oralism through the medical eradication of deafness and through pedagogical bans on sign language. Despite the prominence of the cochlear implant in disability studies, bioethics, and science fiction, however, this has inspired little research in science and technology studies (STS).",
keywords = "Bioethics, Cochlear implants, Deaf culture, Electroacoustic objects, Oralism",
author = "Mara Mills",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195388947.013.0077",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780195388947",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Do Signals Have Politics? Inscribing Abilities in Cochlear Implants

AU - Mills, Mara

PY - 2012/11/21

Y1 - 2012/11/21

N2 - This article discusses autoexperiments, field notes, and laboratory tests on the hardware and software of cochlear implants. Electroacoustic devices resist seeing-through. Yet in the case of cochlear implants, the desires of early users, the conflicting demands of mainstream medicine and economics, and the mediated features of electrical listening, the politics attendant upon communication can be found embedded in the design of electroacoustic objects. Many bioethicists have taken up the Deaf culture or linguistic minority critique of implantation, which situates this technology in the long history of eugenicist attempts to promote oralism through the medical eradication of deafness and through pedagogical bans on sign language. Despite the prominence of the cochlear implant in disability studies, bioethics, and science fiction, however, this has inspired little research in science and technology studies (STS).

AB - This article discusses autoexperiments, field notes, and laboratory tests on the hardware and software of cochlear implants. Electroacoustic devices resist seeing-through. Yet in the case of cochlear implants, the desires of early users, the conflicting demands of mainstream medicine and economics, and the mediated features of electrical listening, the politics attendant upon communication can be found embedded in the design of electroacoustic objects. Many bioethicists have taken up the Deaf culture or linguistic minority critique of implantation, which situates this technology in the long history of eugenicist attempts to promote oralism through the medical eradication of deafness and through pedagogical bans on sign language. Despite the prominence of the cochlear implant in disability studies, bioethics, and science fiction, however, this has inspired little research in science and technology studies (STS).

KW - Bioethics

KW - Cochlear implants

KW - Deaf culture

KW - Electroacoustic objects

KW - Oralism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923480158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923480158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195388947.013.0077

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195388947.013.0077

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780195388947

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -