Do protective behaviors follow the experience of testing positive for herpes simplex type 2?

Richard A. Crosby, Sara Head, Ralph DiClemente, Beth Meyerson, Adewale Troutman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that individuals attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic would adopt sexual protective behaviors after receiving a positive test for herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2). METHODS: Recruitment (N = 360) occurred in a publicly funded STD clinic located in a metropolitan area of the southern United States. Participants were tested for HSV-2 using a rapid test manufactured by Biokit (Lexington, MA) and they completed a self-administered questionnaire before and 3 months after being tested for HSV-2. Follow-up questionnaires were completed by 256 participants (71.1%). RESULTS: Of those completing follow-up, 43.4% (n = 111) tested positive for HSV-2 at enrollment. Significant differences between participants testing positive and those testing negative (at baseline) for HSV-2 over the follow-up period were not observed for frequency of sex, frequency of condom use, avoiding sex, and number of sex partners. Controlling for statistically identified covariates did not alter the null findings for these between group analyses. When analyzing change (baseline to follow-up) among only those testing positive, significant differences were not found with the exception of reporting greater frequency of condom use with steady (P = 0.037) and nonsteady partners at follow-up (P = 0.017). However, repeated measures analyses yielded only 1 significant group × time interaction; this indicated a greater increase in condom use frequency with steady partners among persons testing negative compared with those testing positive. CONCLUSIONS: Among STD clinic attendees, diagnosis of HSV-2 was unrelated to the adoption of sexual behaviors protective against further acquisition and transmission of STDs. In the absence of education beyond posttest counseling, becoming aware of HSV-2 positive serostatus may not be sufficient to motivate the adoption of safer sex behaviors among this population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-790
Number of pages4
JournalSexually Transmitted Diseases
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2008

Fingerprint

Herpes Simplex
Human Herpesvirus 2
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Condoms
Sexual Behavior
Safe Sex
Counseling
Education
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Do protective behaviors follow the experience of testing positive for herpes simplex type 2? / Crosby, Richard A.; Head, Sara; DiClemente, Ralph; Meyerson, Beth; Troutman, Adewale.

In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vol. 35, No. 9, 01.09.2008, p. 787-790.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crosby, Richard A. ; Head, Sara ; DiClemente, Ralph ; Meyerson, Beth ; Troutman, Adewale. / Do protective behaviors follow the experience of testing positive for herpes simplex type 2?. In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 9. pp. 787-790.
@article{f1630787cf26435bb2ce920f39173e54,
title = "Do protective behaviors follow the experience of testing positive for herpes simplex type 2?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that individuals attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic would adopt sexual protective behaviors after receiving a positive test for herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2). METHODS: Recruitment (N = 360) occurred in a publicly funded STD clinic located in a metropolitan area of the southern United States. Participants were tested for HSV-2 using a rapid test manufactured by Biokit (Lexington, MA) and they completed a self-administered questionnaire before and 3 months after being tested for HSV-2. Follow-up questionnaires were completed by 256 participants (71.1{\%}). RESULTS: Of those completing follow-up, 43.4{\%} (n = 111) tested positive for HSV-2 at enrollment. Significant differences between participants testing positive and those testing negative (at baseline) for HSV-2 over the follow-up period were not observed for frequency of sex, frequency of condom use, avoiding sex, and number of sex partners. Controlling for statistically identified covariates did not alter the null findings for these between group analyses. When analyzing change (baseline to follow-up) among only those testing positive, significant differences were not found with the exception of reporting greater frequency of condom use with steady (P = 0.037) and nonsteady partners at follow-up (P = 0.017). However, repeated measures analyses yielded only 1 significant group × time interaction; this indicated a greater increase in condom use frequency with steady partners among persons testing negative compared with those testing positive. CONCLUSIONS: Among STD clinic attendees, diagnosis of HSV-2 was unrelated to the adoption of sexual behaviors protective against further acquisition and transmission of STDs. In the absence of education beyond posttest counseling, becoming aware of HSV-2 positive serostatus may not be sufficient to motivate the adoption of safer sex behaviors among this population.",
author = "Crosby, {Richard A.} and Sara Head and Ralph DiClemente and Beth Meyerson and Adewale Troutman",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318177a068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "787--790",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Diseases",
issn = "0148-5717",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do protective behaviors follow the experience of testing positive for herpes simplex type 2?

AU - Crosby, Richard A.

AU - Head, Sara

AU - DiClemente, Ralph

AU - Meyerson, Beth

AU - Troutman, Adewale

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that individuals attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic would adopt sexual protective behaviors after receiving a positive test for herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2). METHODS: Recruitment (N = 360) occurred in a publicly funded STD clinic located in a metropolitan area of the southern United States. Participants were tested for HSV-2 using a rapid test manufactured by Biokit (Lexington, MA) and they completed a self-administered questionnaire before and 3 months after being tested for HSV-2. Follow-up questionnaires were completed by 256 participants (71.1%). RESULTS: Of those completing follow-up, 43.4% (n = 111) tested positive for HSV-2 at enrollment. Significant differences between participants testing positive and those testing negative (at baseline) for HSV-2 over the follow-up period were not observed for frequency of sex, frequency of condom use, avoiding sex, and number of sex partners. Controlling for statistically identified covariates did not alter the null findings for these between group analyses. When analyzing change (baseline to follow-up) among only those testing positive, significant differences were not found with the exception of reporting greater frequency of condom use with steady (P = 0.037) and nonsteady partners at follow-up (P = 0.017). However, repeated measures analyses yielded only 1 significant group × time interaction; this indicated a greater increase in condom use frequency with steady partners among persons testing negative compared with those testing positive. CONCLUSIONS: Among STD clinic attendees, diagnosis of HSV-2 was unrelated to the adoption of sexual behaviors protective against further acquisition and transmission of STDs. In the absence of education beyond posttest counseling, becoming aware of HSV-2 positive serostatus may not be sufficient to motivate the adoption of safer sex behaviors among this population.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that individuals attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic would adopt sexual protective behaviors after receiving a positive test for herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2). METHODS: Recruitment (N = 360) occurred in a publicly funded STD clinic located in a metropolitan area of the southern United States. Participants were tested for HSV-2 using a rapid test manufactured by Biokit (Lexington, MA) and they completed a self-administered questionnaire before and 3 months after being tested for HSV-2. Follow-up questionnaires were completed by 256 participants (71.1%). RESULTS: Of those completing follow-up, 43.4% (n = 111) tested positive for HSV-2 at enrollment. Significant differences between participants testing positive and those testing negative (at baseline) for HSV-2 over the follow-up period were not observed for frequency of sex, frequency of condom use, avoiding sex, and number of sex partners. Controlling for statistically identified covariates did not alter the null findings for these between group analyses. When analyzing change (baseline to follow-up) among only those testing positive, significant differences were not found with the exception of reporting greater frequency of condom use with steady (P = 0.037) and nonsteady partners at follow-up (P = 0.017). However, repeated measures analyses yielded only 1 significant group × time interaction; this indicated a greater increase in condom use frequency with steady partners among persons testing negative compared with those testing positive. CONCLUSIONS: Among STD clinic attendees, diagnosis of HSV-2 was unrelated to the adoption of sexual behaviors protective against further acquisition and transmission of STDs. In the absence of education beyond posttest counseling, becoming aware of HSV-2 positive serostatus may not be sufficient to motivate the adoption of safer sex behaviors among this population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53749095266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53749095266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318177a068

DO - 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318177a068

M3 - Article

C2 - 18607318

AN - SCOPUS:53749095266

VL - 35

SP - 787

EP - 790

JO - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

JF - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

SN - 0148-5717

IS - 9

ER -