Do processes of change predict smoking stage movements? A prospective analysis of the transtheoretical model

Thaddeus A. Herzog, David Abrams, Karen M. Emmons, Laura A. Linnan, William G. Shadel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The transtheoretical model (TTM) posits that processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking predict progressive movement through the stages of change. This study provides both a cross-sectional replication and a prospective test of this hypothesis. As part of a larger study of worksite cancer prevention (the Working Well Trial), employees of 26 manufacturing worksites completed a baseline and 2 annual follow-up surveys. Of the 63% of employees completing baseline surveys, 27.7% were smokers (N = 1,535), and a cohort of these smokers completed the 2-year follow-up. Cross-sectional results replicated previous studies with virtually all the processes of change and the cons of smoking increasing in linear fashion from precontemplation to preparation (all ps < .00001), and the pros of smoking decreasing (p < .01). However, contrary to the hypothesis, the baseline processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking failed to predict progressive stage movements at either the 1- or the 2-year follow-ups. Possible explanations for these findings and concerns about the conceptual internal consistency of the TTM are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-375
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1999

Fingerprint

Smoking
Workplace
Neoplasms
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Cancer prevention
  • Health promotion
  • Smoking
  • Social cognitive theory
  • Stages of change
  • Worksites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Do processes of change predict smoking stage movements? A prospective analysis of the transtheoretical model. / Herzog, Thaddeus A.; Abrams, David; Emmons, Karen M.; Linnan, Laura A.; Shadel, William G.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 07.1999, p. 369-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herzog, Thaddeus A. ; Abrams, David ; Emmons, Karen M. ; Linnan, Laura A. ; Shadel, William G. / Do processes of change predict smoking stage movements? A prospective analysis of the transtheoretical model. In: Health Psychology. 1999 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 369-375.
@article{2af61562c67146f1950533df8008319f,
title = "Do processes of change predict smoking stage movements? A prospective analysis of the transtheoretical model",
abstract = "The transtheoretical model (TTM) posits that processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking predict progressive movement through the stages of change. This study provides both a cross-sectional replication and a prospective test of this hypothesis. As part of a larger study of worksite cancer prevention (the Working Well Trial), employees of 26 manufacturing worksites completed a baseline and 2 annual follow-up surveys. Of the 63{\%} of employees completing baseline surveys, 27.7{\%} were smokers (N = 1,535), and a cohort of these smokers completed the 2-year follow-up. Cross-sectional results replicated previous studies with virtually all the processes of change and the cons of smoking increasing in linear fashion from precontemplation to preparation (all ps < .00001), and the pros of smoking decreasing (p < .01). However, contrary to the hypothesis, the baseline processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking failed to predict progressive stage movements at either the 1- or the 2-year follow-ups. Possible explanations for these findings and concerns about the conceptual internal consistency of the TTM are discussed.",
keywords = "Cancer prevention, Health promotion, Smoking, Social cognitive theory, Stages of change, Worksites",
author = "Herzog, {Thaddeus A.} and David Abrams and Emmons, {Karen M.} and Linnan, {Laura A.} and Shadel, {William G.}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.369",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "369--375",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do processes of change predict smoking stage movements? A prospective analysis of the transtheoretical model

AU - Herzog, Thaddeus A.

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Emmons, Karen M.

AU - Linnan, Laura A.

AU - Shadel, William G.

PY - 1999/7

Y1 - 1999/7

N2 - The transtheoretical model (TTM) posits that processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking predict progressive movement through the stages of change. This study provides both a cross-sectional replication and a prospective test of this hypothesis. As part of a larger study of worksite cancer prevention (the Working Well Trial), employees of 26 manufacturing worksites completed a baseline and 2 annual follow-up surveys. Of the 63% of employees completing baseline surveys, 27.7% were smokers (N = 1,535), and a cohort of these smokers completed the 2-year follow-up. Cross-sectional results replicated previous studies with virtually all the processes of change and the cons of smoking increasing in linear fashion from precontemplation to preparation (all ps < .00001), and the pros of smoking decreasing (p < .01). However, contrary to the hypothesis, the baseline processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking failed to predict progressive stage movements at either the 1- or the 2-year follow-ups. Possible explanations for these findings and concerns about the conceptual internal consistency of the TTM are discussed.

AB - The transtheoretical model (TTM) posits that processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking predict progressive movement through the stages of change. This study provides both a cross-sectional replication and a prospective test of this hypothesis. As part of a larger study of worksite cancer prevention (the Working Well Trial), employees of 26 manufacturing worksites completed a baseline and 2 annual follow-up surveys. Of the 63% of employees completing baseline surveys, 27.7% were smokers (N = 1,535), and a cohort of these smokers completed the 2-year follow-up. Cross-sectional results replicated previous studies with virtually all the processes of change and the cons of smoking increasing in linear fashion from precontemplation to preparation (all ps < .00001), and the pros of smoking decreasing (p < .01). However, contrary to the hypothesis, the baseline processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking failed to predict progressive stage movements at either the 1- or the 2-year follow-ups. Possible explanations for these findings and concerns about the conceptual internal consistency of the TTM are discussed.

KW - Cancer prevention

KW - Health promotion

KW - Smoking

KW - Social cognitive theory

KW - Stages of change

KW - Worksites

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032791905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032791905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.369

DO - 10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.369

M3 - Article

C2 - 10431938

AN - SCOPUS:0032791905

VL - 18

SP - 369

EP - 375

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 4

ER -