Do people with specific skills want more social insurance? Not in the United States

Jeffrey Timmons, Jerry Nickelsburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Skill specificity is thought to increase preferences for social insurance (Iversen and Soskice, 2001, American Political Science Review 95,875), especially where employment protections are low, notably the United States (Gingrich and Ansell, 2012, Comparative Political Studies 45, 1624). The compensating differentials literature, by contrast, suggests that neither skill specificity, nor labor market protections affect preferences when wages adjust for differences in risks and investment costs. We examine these competing predictions using U.S. data on general and specific skills. Absolute and relative skill specificity have a robust positive correlation with income, but are negatively correlated with preferences for social protection. Our results strongly support the compensating differentials approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-482
Number of pages26
JournalEconomics and Politics
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Social insurance
Specificity
Compensating differentials
Income
Social protection
Political Science
Wages
Prediction
Employment protection
Costs
Labour market

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Do people with specific skills want more social insurance? Not in the United States. / Timmons, Jeffrey; Nickelsburg, Jerry.

In: Economics and Politics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 457-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db7fa89109f44744b2817948f9e2c7e9,
title = "Do people with specific skills want more social insurance? Not in the United States",
abstract = "Skill specificity is thought to increase preferences for social insurance (Iversen and Soskice, 2001, American Political Science Review 95,875), especially where employment protections are low, notably the United States (Gingrich and Ansell, 2012, Comparative Political Studies 45, 1624). The compensating differentials literature, by contrast, suggests that neither skill specificity, nor labor market protections affect preferences when wages adjust for differences in risks and investment costs. We examine these competing predictions using U.S. data on general and specific skills. Absolute and relative skill specificity have a robust positive correlation with income, but are negatively correlated with preferences for social protection. Our results strongly support the compensating differentials approach.",
author = "Jeffrey Timmons and Jerry Nickelsburg",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ecpo.12043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "457--482",
journal = "Economics and Politics",
issn = "0954-1985",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do people with specific skills want more social insurance? Not in the United States

AU - Timmons, Jeffrey

AU - Nickelsburg, Jerry

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Skill specificity is thought to increase preferences for social insurance (Iversen and Soskice, 2001, American Political Science Review 95,875), especially where employment protections are low, notably the United States (Gingrich and Ansell, 2012, Comparative Political Studies 45, 1624). The compensating differentials literature, by contrast, suggests that neither skill specificity, nor labor market protections affect preferences when wages adjust for differences in risks and investment costs. We examine these competing predictions using U.S. data on general and specific skills. Absolute and relative skill specificity have a robust positive correlation with income, but are negatively correlated with preferences for social protection. Our results strongly support the compensating differentials approach.

AB - Skill specificity is thought to increase preferences for social insurance (Iversen and Soskice, 2001, American Political Science Review 95,875), especially where employment protections are low, notably the United States (Gingrich and Ansell, 2012, Comparative Political Studies 45, 1624). The compensating differentials literature, by contrast, suggests that neither skill specificity, nor labor market protections affect preferences when wages adjust for differences in risks and investment costs. We examine these competing predictions using U.S. data on general and specific skills. Absolute and relative skill specificity have a robust positive correlation with income, but are negatively correlated with preferences for social protection. Our results strongly support the compensating differentials approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908328417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908328417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ecpo.12043

DO - 10.1111/ecpo.12043

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908328417

VL - 26

SP - 457

EP - 482

JO - Economics and Politics

JF - Economics and Politics

SN - 0954-1985

IS - 3

ER -