Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Rather Than Quantities

Amanda C. Brandone, Andrei Cimpian, Sarah Jane Leslie, Susan A. Gelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Generic statements (e.g., "Lions have manes") make claims about kinds (e.g., lions as a category) and, for adults, are distinct from quantificational statements (e.g., "Most lions have manes"), which make claims about how many individuals have a given property. This article examined whether young children also understand that generics do not depend purely on quantitative information. Five-year-olds (n=36) evaluated pairs of questions expressing properties that were matched in prevalence but varied in whether adults accept them as generically true (e.g., "Do lions have manes?" [true] vs. "Are lions boys?" [false]). Results demonstrated that children evaluate generics based on more than just quantitative information. Data suggest that even young children recognize that generics make claims about kinds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-433
Number of pages11
JournalChild Development
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Lions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Rather Than Quantities. / Brandone, Amanda C.; Cimpian, Andrei; Leslie, Sarah Jane; Gelman, Susan A.

In: Child Development, Vol. 83, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 423-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brandone, Amanda C. ; Cimpian, Andrei ; Leslie, Sarah Jane ; Gelman, Susan A. / Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Rather Than Quantities. In: Child Development. 2012 ; Vol. 83, No. 2. pp. 423-433.
@article{525cc3fe909043588124f6a8eb8a6bd3,
title = "Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Rather Than Quantities",
abstract = "Generic statements (e.g., {"}Lions have manes{"}) make claims about kinds (e.g., lions as a category) and, for adults, are distinct from quantificational statements (e.g., {"}Most lions have manes{"}), which make claims about how many individuals have a given property. This article examined whether young children also understand that generics do not depend purely on quantitative information. Five-year-olds (n=36) evaluated pairs of questions expressing properties that were matched in prevalence but varied in whether adults accept them as generically true (e.g., {"}Do lions have manes?{"} [true] vs. {"}Are lions boys?{"} [false]). Results demonstrated that children evaluate generics based on more than just quantitative information. Data suggest that even young children recognize that generics make claims about kinds.",
author = "Brandone, {Amanda C.} and Andrei Cimpian and Leslie, {Sarah Jane} and Gelman, {Susan A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01708.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "423--433",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Rather Than Quantities

AU - Brandone, Amanda C.

AU - Cimpian, Andrei

AU - Leslie, Sarah Jane

AU - Gelman, Susan A.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Generic statements (e.g., "Lions have manes") make claims about kinds (e.g., lions as a category) and, for adults, are distinct from quantificational statements (e.g., "Most lions have manes"), which make claims about how many individuals have a given property. This article examined whether young children also understand that generics do not depend purely on quantitative information. Five-year-olds (n=36) evaluated pairs of questions expressing properties that were matched in prevalence but varied in whether adults accept them as generically true (e.g., "Do lions have manes?" [true] vs. "Are lions boys?" [false]). Results demonstrated that children evaluate generics based on more than just quantitative information. Data suggest that even young children recognize that generics make claims about kinds.

AB - Generic statements (e.g., "Lions have manes") make claims about kinds (e.g., lions as a category) and, for adults, are distinct from quantificational statements (e.g., "Most lions have manes"), which make claims about how many individuals have a given property. This article examined whether young children also understand that generics do not depend purely on quantitative information. Five-year-olds (n=36) evaluated pairs of questions expressing properties that were matched in prevalence but varied in whether adults accept them as generically true (e.g., "Do lions have manes?" [true] vs. "Are lions boys?" [false]). Results demonstrated that children evaluate generics based on more than just quantitative information. Data suggest that even young children recognize that generics make claims about kinds.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855612994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855612994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01708.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01708.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22235892

AN - SCOPUS:84855612994

VL - 83

SP - 423

EP - 433

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 2

ER -