Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?

Paula England, Jonathan Bearak, Michelle J. Budig, Melissa J. Hodges

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Motherhood reduces women’s wages. But does the size of this penalty differ between more and less advantaged women? To answer this, we use unconditional quantile regression models with person-fixed effects, and panel data from the 1979 to 2010 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79). We find that among white women, the most privileged—women with high skills and high wages—experience the highest total penalties, estimated to include effects mediated through lost experience. Although highly skilled, highly paid women have fairly continuous experience, their high returns to experience make even the small amounts of time some of them take out of employment for childrearing costly. By contrast, penalties net of experience, which may represent employer discrimination or effects of motherhood on job performance, are not distinctive for highly skilled women with high wages.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1161-1189
    Number of pages29
    JournalAmerican Sociological Review
    Volume81
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    motherhood
    penalty
    experience
    wage
    job performance
    employer
    discrimination
    regression
    human being

    Keywords

    • gender
    • labor markets
    • motherhood
    • wage trajectories

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty? / England, Paula; Bearak, Jonathan; Budig, Michelle J.; Hodges, Melissa J.

    In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 81, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 1161-1189.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    England, Paula ; Bearak, Jonathan ; Budig, Michelle J. ; Hodges, Melissa J. / Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?. In: American Sociological Review. 2016 ; Vol. 81, No. 6. pp. 1161-1189.
    @article{de6a85aa1c01475d82480b59a19934bb,
    title = "Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?",
    abstract = "Motherhood reduces women’s wages. But does the size of this penalty differ between more and less advantaged women? To answer this, we use unconditional quantile regression models with person-fixed effects, and panel data from the 1979 to 2010 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79). We find that among white women, the most privileged—women with high skills and high wages—experience the highest total penalties, estimated to include effects mediated through lost experience. Although highly skilled, highly paid women have fairly continuous experience, their high returns to experience make even the small amounts of time some of them take out of employment for childrearing costly. By contrast, penalties net of experience, which may represent employer discrimination or effects of motherhood on job performance, are not distinctive for highly skilled women with high wages.",
    keywords = "gender, labor markets, motherhood, wage trajectories",
    author = "Paula England and Jonathan Bearak and Budig, {Michelle J.} and Hodges, {Melissa J.}",
    year = "2016",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0003122416673598",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "81",
    pages = "1161--1189",
    journal = "American Sociological Review",
    issn = "0003-1224",
    publisher = "American Sociological Association",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?

    AU - England, Paula

    AU - Bearak, Jonathan

    AU - Budig, Michelle J.

    AU - Hodges, Melissa J.

    PY - 2016/12/1

    Y1 - 2016/12/1

    N2 - Motherhood reduces women’s wages. But does the size of this penalty differ between more and less advantaged women? To answer this, we use unconditional quantile regression models with person-fixed effects, and panel data from the 1979 to 2010 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79). We find that among white women, the most privileged—women with high skills and high wages—experience the highest total penalties, estimated to include effects mediated through lost experience. Although highly skilled, highly paid women have fairly continuous experience, their high returns to experience make even the small amounts of time some of them take out of employment for childrearing costly. By contrast, penalties net of experience, which may represent employer discrimination or effects of motherhood on job performance, are not distinctive for highly skilled women with high wages.

    AB - Motherhood reduces women’s wages. But does the size of this penalty differ between more and less advantaged women? To answer this, we use unconditional quantile regression models with person-fixed effects, and panel data from the 1979 to 2010 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79). We find that among white women, the most privileged—women with high skills and high wages—experience the highest total penalties, estimated to include effects mediated through lost experience. Although highly skilled, highly paid women have fairly continuous experience, their high returns to experience make even the small amounts of time some of them take out of employment for childrearing costly. By contrast, penalties net of experience, which may represent employer discrimination or effects of motherhood on job performance, are not distinctive for highly skilled women with high wages.

    KW - gender

    KW - labor markets

    KW - motherhood

    KW - wage trajectories

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002328288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002328288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0003122416673598

    DO - 10.1177/0003122416673598

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85002328288

    VL - 81

    SP - 1161

    EP - 1189

    JO - American Sociological Review

    JF - American Sociological Review

    SN - 0003-1224

    IS - 6

    ER -