Do Changing Values Explain the New Politics? A Critical Assessment of the Postmaterialist Thesis

Clem Brooks, Jeffrey Manza

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Many social scientists have argued that major political changes have occurred in the postindustrial societies of Western Europe, North America, and Australasia since the 1960s. These changes include partisan dealignment accompanied by a breakdown in traditional political orientations, the appearance of “new social movements,” and increasing use of non‐traditional forms of political action. One of the most influential account of the origins of the “New Politics” is Ronald Inglehart's “postmaterialist” thesis. Analyzing data from the Political Action surveys, we test two central propositions of the postmaterialist thesis: that postmaterialism constitutes an emerging and categorically distinct type of value commitment in these societies; and that a commitment to postmaterialism leads to a rejection of the state as a means of accomplishing policy objectives. Neither of these propositions is supported. The analyses instead provide evidence for an alternative account that we characterize as “value pluralism,” and they show further that even citizens with postmaterialist values endorse the intervention of state institutions to achieve desired political outcomes.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)541-570
    Number of pages30
    JournalSociological Quarterly
    Volume35
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1994

    Fingerprint

    post-materialism
    political action
    politics
    commitment
    post-industrial society
    Values
    political attitude
    political change
    social scientist
    Social Movements
    Western Europe
    pluralism
    citizen
    society
    evidence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Do Changing Values Explain the New Politics? A Critical Assessment of the Postmaterialist Thesis. / Brooks, Clem; Manza, Jeffrey.

    In: Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1994, p. 541-570.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{12275b6d546b48aaa8a421f40a63fbd0,
    title = "Do Changing Values Explain the New Politics? A Critical Assessment of the Postmaterialist Thesis",
    abstract = "Many social scientists have argued that major political changes have occurred in the postindustrial societies of Western Europe, North America, and Australasia since the 1960s. These changes include partisan dealignment accompanied by a breakdown in traditional political orientations, the appearance of “new social movements,” and increasing use of non‐traditional forms of political action. One of the most influential account of the origins of the “New Politics” is Ronald Inglehart's “postmaterialist” thesis. Analyzing data from the Political Action surveys, we test two central propositions of the postmaterialist thesis: that postmaterialism constitutes an emerging and categorically distinct type of value commitment in these societies; and that a commitment to postmaterialism leads to a rejection of the state as a means of accomplishing policy objectives. Neither of these propositions is supported. The analyses instead provide evidence for an alternative account that we characterize as “value pluralism,” and they show further that even citizens with postmaterialist values endorse the intervention of state institutions to achieve desired political outcomes.",
    author = "Clem Brooks and Jeffrey Manza",
    year = "1994",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1533-8525.1994.tb00416.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "541--570",
    journal = "Sociological Quarterly",
    issn = "0038-0253",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Do Changing Values Explain the New Politics? A Critical Assessment of the Postmaterialist Thesis

    AU - Brooks, Clem

    AU - Manza, Jeffrey

    PY - 1994

    Y1 - 1994

    N2 - Many social scientists have argued that major political changes have occurred in the postindustrial societies of Western Europe, North America, and Australasia since the 1960s. These changes include partisan dealignment accompanied by a breakdown in traditional political orientations, the appearance of “new social movements,” and increasing use of non‐traditional forms of political action. One of the most influential account of the origins of the “New Politics” is Ronald Inglehart's “postmaterialist” thesis. Analyzing data from the Political Action surveys, we test two central propositions of the postmaterialist thesis: that postmaterialism constitutes an emerging and categorically distinct type of value commitment in these societies; and that a commitment to postmaterialism leads to a rejection of the state as a means of accomplishing policy objectives. Neither of these propositions is supported. The analyses instead provide evidence for an alternative account that we characterize as “value pluralism,” and they show further that even citizens with postmaterialist values endorse the intervention of state institutions to achieve desired political outcomes.

    AB - Many social scientists have argued that major political changes have occurred in the postindustrial societies of Western Europe, North America, and Australasia since the 1960s. These changes include partisan dealignment accompanied by a breakdown in traditional political orientations, the appearance of “new social movements,” and increasing use of non‐traditional forms of political action. One of the most influential account of the origins of the “New Politics” is Ronald Inglehart's “postmaterialist” thesis. Analyzing data from the Political Action surveys, we test two central propositions of the postmaterialist thesis: that postmaterialism constitutes an emerging and categorically distinct type of value commitment in these societies; and that a commitment to postmaterialism leads to a rejection of the state as a means of accomplishing policy objectives. Neither of these propositions is supported. The analyses instead provide evidence for an alternative account that we characterize as “value pluralism,” and they show further that even citizens with postmaterialist values endorse the intervention of state institutions to achieve desired political outcomes.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995137518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995137518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1994.tb00416.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1994.tb00416.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 541

    EP - 570

    JO - Sociological Quarterly

    JF - Sociological Quarterly

    SN - 0038-0253

    IS - 4

    ER -