Do changes in pension incentives affect retirement? A longitudinal study of subjective retirement expectations

Sewin Chan, Ann Huff Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper investigates the responsiveness of individuals' retirement decisions to forward-looking measures of pension accumulations. In contrast to previous research, we use within-person variation in retirement incentives and are able to control for unobserved heterogeneity in tastes for retirement by studying a panel of subjective retirement expectations. We confirm that individuals do respond as expected to pension incentives, even when we control for individual fixed effects. However, the magnitude of these responses differs when estimated from models based on within-person versus cross-sectional variation: the inclusion of fixed effects reduces the response by about half.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1307-1333
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Public Economics
Volume88
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

Incentives
Retirement
Longitudinal study
Pensions
Fixed effects
Unobserved heterogeneity
Responsiveness
Inclusion

Keywords

  • Pension incentives
  • Retirement
  • Subjective retirement expectations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

Do changes in pension incentives affect retirement? A longitudinal study of subjective retirement expectations. / Chan, Sewin; Stevens, Ann Huff.

In: Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 88, No. 7-8, 07.2004, p. 1307-1333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{060280fcdaa04e99a364e59b7eb1ce3b,
title = "Do changes in pension incentives affect retirement? A longitudinal study of subjective retirement expectations",
abstract = "This paper investigates the responsiveness of individuals' retirement decisions to forward-looking measures of pension accumulations. In contrast to previous research, we use within-person variation in retirement incentives and are able to control for unobserved heterogeneity in tastes for retirement by studying a panel of subjective retirement expectations. We confirm that individuals do respond as expected to pension incentives, even when we control for individual fixed effects. However, the magnitude of these responses differs when estimated from models based on within-person versus cross-sectional variation: the inclusion of fixed effects reduces the response by about half.",
keywords = "Pension incentives, Retirement, Subjective retirement expectations",
author = "Sewin Chan and Stevens, {Ann Huff}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00223-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "1307--1333",
journal = "Journal of Public Economics",
issn = "0047-2727",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do changes in pension incentives affect retirement? A longitudinal study of subjective retirement expectations

AU - Chan, Sewin

AU - Stevens, Ann Huff

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - This paper investigates the responsiveness of individuals' retirement decisions to forward-looking measures of pension accumulations. In contrast to previous research, we use within-person variation in retirement incentives and are able to control for unobserved heterogeneity in tastes for retirement by studying a panel of subjective retirement expectations. We confirm that individuals do respond as expected to pension incentives, even when we control for individual fixed effects. However, the magnitude of these responses differs when estimated from models based on within-person versus cross-sectional variation: the inclusion of fixed effects reduces the response by about half.

AB - This paper investigates the responsiveness of individuals' retirement decisions to forward-looking measures of pension accumulations. In contrast to previous research, we use within-person variation in retirement incentives and are able to control for unobserved heterogeneity in tastes for retirement by studying a panel of subjective retirement expectations. We confirm that individuals do respond as expected to pension incentives, even when we control for individual fixed effects. However, the magnitude of these responses differs when estimated from models based on within-person versus cross-sectional variation: the inclusion of fixed effects reduces the response by about half.

KW - Pension incentives

KW - Retirement

KW - Subjective retirement expectations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347759832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347759832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00223-2

DO - 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00223-2

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 1307

EP - 1333

JO - Journal of Public Economics

JF - Journal of Public Economics

SN - 0047-2727

IS - 7-8

ER -