Do activated letters influence lexical selection in written word production?

Carolyn Falconer, Adam Buchwald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Written communication has become increasingly important since the advent of digital media such as emailing and texting. Research into the nature of interaction between the cognitive processes underlying production have focused on spoken language. Less is known about the processes underlying written word production. Aims: We investigated the presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection in written word production. The presence of feedback would lead to greater-than-chance orthographic overlap between targets and semantically-related word errors in acquired dysgraphia, as the semantic neighbours of a target word sharing orthographic structure would receive extra support during lexical selection. Methods & Procedures: The orthographic overlap of written semantically-related word errors from an individual with acquired dysgraphia was compared to chance distributions of overlap generated using a word association database. We used a Monte Carlo procedure to select random "pseudo-errors" from the top semantic associates for each target word. 10,000 hypothetical datasets were generated for two distinct hypotheses regarding the likelihood of selecting particular semantically-related word errors. Outcomes & Results: The orthographic overlap between target words and semantically-related word errors for the individual with dysgraphia was greater than any of the hypothetical datasets, indicating that the target-error pairs shared more orthographic structure than expected by chance (p <.0001). Conclusions: We obtained evidence that feedback from letter activation influenced lexical selection in a case of impairment. The presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection may be useful in developing strategies leading to improved language production in individuals with dysgraphia and aphasia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)849-866
Number of pages18
JournalAphasiology
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Agraphia
Semantics
activation
Language
Text Messaging
Aphasia
semantics
digital media
Communication
speech disorder
production process
Databases
spoken language
Word Production
Letters
Research
Orthographic
communication
interaction
language

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • Dysgraphia
  • Language processes
  • Lexical selection
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • LPN and LVN
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Do activated letters influence lexical selection in written word production? / Falconer, Carolyn; Buchwald, Adam.

In: Aphasiology, Vol. 27, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 849-866.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c49453c063f4c56b8195a73f753cc8c,
title = "Do activated letters influence lexical selection in written word production?",
abstract = "Background: Written communication has become increasingly important since the advent of digital media such as emailing and texting. Research into the nature of interaction between the cognitive processes underlying production have focused on spoken language. Less is known about the processes underlying written word production. Aims: We investigated the presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection in written word production. The presence of feedback would lead to greater-than-chance orthographic overlap between targets and semantically-related word errors in acquired dysgraphia, as the semantic neighbours of a target word sharing orthographic structure would receive extra support during lexical selection. Methods & Procedures: The orthographic overlap of written semantically-related word errors from an individual with acquired dysgraphia was compared to chance distributions of overlap generated using a word association database. We used a Monte Carlo procedure to select random {"}pseudo-errors{"} from the top semantic associates for each target word. 10,000 hypothetical datasets were generated for two distinct hypotheses regarding the likelihood of selecting particular semantically-related word errors. Outcomes & Results: The orthographic overlap between target words and semantically-related word errors for the individual with dysgraphia was greater than any of the hypothetical datasets, indicating that the target-error pairs shared more orthographic structure than expected by chance (p <.0001). Conclusions: We obtained evidence that feedback from letter activation influenced lexical selection in a case of impairment. The presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection may be useful in developing strategies leading to improved language production in individuals with dysgraphia and aphasia.",
keywords = "Aphasia, Dysgraphia, Language processes, Lexical selection, Writing",
author = "Carolyn Falconer and Adam Buchwald",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/02687038.2013.781114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "849--866",
journal = "Aphasiology",
issn = "0268-7038",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do activated letters influence lexical selection in written word production?

AU - Falconer, Carolyn

AU - Buchwald, Adam

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Background: Written communication has become increasingly important since the advent of digital media such as emailing and texting. Research into the nature of interaction between the cognitive processes underlying production have focused on spoken language. Less is known about the processes underlying written word production. Aims: We investigated the presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection in written word production. The presence of feedback would lead to greater-than-chance orthographic overlap between targets and semantically-related word errors in acquired dysgraphia, as the semantic neighbours of a target word sharing orthographic structure would receive extra support during lexical selection. Methods & Procedures: The orthographic overlap of written semantically-related word errors from an individual with acquired dysgraphia was compared to chance distributions of overlap generated using a word association database. We used a Monte Carlo procedure to select random "pseudo-errors" from the top semantic associates for each target word. 10,000 hypothetical datasets were generated for two distinct hypotheses regarding the likelihood of selecting particular semantically-related word errors. Outcomes & Results: The orthographic overlap between target words and semantically-related word errors for the individual with dysgraphia was greater than any of the hypothetical datasets, indicating that the target-error pairs shared more orthographic structure than expected by chance (p <.0001). Conclusions: We obtained evidence that feedback from letter activation influenced lexical selection in a case of impairment. The presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection may be useful in developing strategies leading to improved language production in individuals with dysgraphia and aphasia.

AB - Background: Written communication has become increasingly important since the advent of digital media such as emailing and texting. Research into the nature of interaction between the cognitive processes underlying production have focused on spoken language. Less is known about the processes underlying written word production. Aims: We investigated the presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection in written word production. The presence of feedback would lead to greater-than-chance orthographic overlap between targets and semantically-related word errors in acquired dysgraphia, as the semantic neighbours of a target word sharing orthographic structure would receive extra support during lexical selection. Methods & Procedures: The orthographic overlap of written semantically-related word errors from an individual with acquired dysgraphia was compared to chance distributions of overlap generated using a word association database. We used a Monte Carlo procedure to select random "pseudo-errors" from the top semantic associates for each target word. 10,000 hypothetical datasets were generated for two distinct hypotheses regarding the likelihood of selecting particular semantically-related word errors. Outcomes & Results: The orthographic overlap between target words and semantically-related word errors for the individual with dysgraphia was greater than any of the hypothetical datasets, indicating that the target-error pairs shared more orthographic structure than expected by chance (p <.0001). Conclusions: We obtained evidence that feedback from letter activation influenced lexical selection in a case of impairment. The presence of feedback from letter activation to lexical selection may be useful in developing strategies leading to improved language production in individuals with dysgraphia and aphasia.

KW - Aphasia

KW - Dysgraphia

KW - Language processes

KW - Lexical selection

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880944984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880944984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02687038.2013.781114

DO - 10.1080/02687038.2013.781114

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 849

EP - 866

JO - Aphasiology

JF - Aphasiology

SN - 0268-7038

IS - 7

ER -