Diversity is what you want it to be: How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity

Miguel M. Unzueta, Eric D. Knowles, Geoffrey C. Ho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We propose that diversity is a malleable concept capable of being used either to attenuate or to enhance racial inequality. The research reported here suggests that when people are exposed to ambiguous information concerning an organization's diversity, they construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social-dominance motives. Specifically, anti-egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial (i.e., occupational) heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is low. By contrast, egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is high. The inclusion of occupational heterogeneity in perceptions of diversity allows people across the spectrum of social-dominance orientation to justify their support for or opposition to hierarchy-attenuating affirmative-action policies. Our findings suggest that diversity may not have a fixed meaning and that, without a specific delineation of what the concept means in particular contexts, people may construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social motivations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-309
Number of pages7
JournalPsychological Science
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Social Dominance
Organizations
Motivation
Research
Construal

Keywords

  • attitudes
  • racial and ethnic attitudes and relations
  • social cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Diversity is what you want it to be : How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity. / Unzueta, Miguel M.; Knowles, Eric D.; Ho, Geoffrey C.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 303-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4934ae9460da430d970cbcbbbde52534,
title = "Diversity is what you want it to be: How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity",
abstract = "We propose that diversity is a malleable concept capable of being used either to attenuate or to enhance racial inequality. The research reported here suggests that when people are exposed to ambiguous information concerning an organization's diversity, they construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social-dominance motives. Specifically, anti-egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial (i.e., occupational) heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is low. By contrast, egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is high. The inclusion of occupational heterogeneity in perceptions of diversity allows people across the spectrum of social-dominance orientation to justify their support for or opposition to hierarchy-attenuating affirmative-action policies. Our findings suggest that diversity may not have a fixed meaning and that, without a specific delineation of what the concept means in particular contexts, people may construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social motivations.",
keywords = "attitudes, racial and ethnic attitudes and relations, social cognition",
author = "Unzueta, {Miguel M.} and Knowles, {Eric D.} and Ho, {Geoffrey C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0956797611426727",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "303--309",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversity is what you want it to be

T2 - How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity

AU - Unzueta, Miguel M.

AU - Knowles, Eric D.

AU - Ho, Geoffrey C.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - We propose that diversity is a malleable concept capable of being used either to attenuate or to enhance racial inequality. The research reported here suggests that when people are exposed to ambiguous information concerning an organization's diversity, they construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social-dominance motives. Specifically, anti-egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial (i.e., occupational) heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is low. By contrast, egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is high. The inclusion of occupational heterogeneity in perceptions of diversity allows people across the spectrum of social-dominance orientation to justify their support for or opposition to hierarchy-attenuating affirmative-action policies. Our findings suggest that diversity may not have a fixed meaning and that, without a specific delineation of what the concept means in particular contexts, people may construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social motivations.

AB - We propose that diversity is a malleable concept capable of being used either to attenuate or to enhance racial inequality. The research reported here suggests that when people are exposed to ambiguous information concerning an organization's diversity, they construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social-dominance motives. Specifically, anti-egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial (i.e., occupational) heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is low. By contrast, egalitarian individuals broaden their construal of diversity to include nonracial heterogeneity when an organization's racial heterogeneity is high. The inclusion of occupational heterogeneity in perceptions of diversity allows people across the spectrum of social-dominance orientation to justify their support for or opposition to hierarchy-attenuating affirmative-action policies. Our findings suggest that diversity may not have a fixed meaning and that, without a specific delineation of what the concept means in particular contexts, people may construe diversity in a manner consistent with their social motivations.

KW - attitudes

KW - racial and ethnic attitudes and relations

KW - social cognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858206717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858206717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0956797611426727

DO - 10.1177/0956797611426727

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 303

EP - 309

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 3

ER -