Distributivity in Formal Semantics

Lucas Champollion

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Distributivity in natural language occurs in sentences such as John and Mary (each) took a deep breath, when a predicate that is combined with a plurality-denoting expression is understood as holding of each of the members of that plurality. Language provides ways to express distributivity overtly, with words such as English each, but also covertly, when no one word can be regarded as contributing it. Both overt and covert distributivity occur in a wide variety of constructions. This article reviews and synthesizes influential approaches to distributivity in formal semantics and includes pointers to some more recent approaches. Theories of distributivity can be distinguished on the basis of how they answer a number of interrelated questions: To what extent can distributivity be attributed to what we know about the world, as opposed to the meanings of words or silent operators? What is the relationship between distributivity and plurality? Does distributivity always reach down to the singular individuals in a plurality? If not, under what circumstances is distributivity over subgroups possible, and what is its relation to distributivity over individuals?

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)289-308
    Number of pages20
    JournalAnnual Review of Linguistics
    Volume5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    semantics
    language
    Formal Semantics
    Distributivity
    Plurality

    Keywords

    • covers
    • Distributivity
    • groups
    • mereology
    • operators
    • plurality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Distributivity in Formal Semantics. / Champollion, Lucas.

    In: Annual Review of Linguistics, Vol. 5, 01.01.2019, p. 289-308.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Champollion, Lucas. / Distributivity in Formal Semantics. In: Annual Review of Linguistics. 2019 ; Vol. 5. pp. 289-308.
    @article{0318a7e394334cd686b420b3acb58291,
    title = "Distributivity in Formal Semantics",
    abstract = "Distributivity in natural language occurs in sentences such as John and Mary (each) took a deep breath, when a predicate that is combined with a plurality-denoting expression is understood as holding of each of the members of that plurality. Language provides ways to express distributivity overtly, with words such as English each, but also covertly, when no one word can be regarded as contributing it. Both overt and covert distributivity occur in a wide variety of constructions. This article reviews and synthesizes influential approaches to distributivity in formal semantics and includes pointers to some more recent approaches. Theories of distributivity can be distinguished on the basis of how they answer a number of interrelated questions: To what extent can distributivity be attributed to what we know about the world, as opposed to the meanings of words or silent operators? What is the relationship between distributivity and plurality? Does distributivity always reach down to the singular individuals in a plurality? If not, under what circumstances is distributivity over subgroups possible, and what is its relation to distributivity over individuals?",
    keywords = "covers, Distributivity, groups, mereology, operators, plurality",
    author = "Lucas Champollion",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012528",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "289--308",
    journal = "Annual Review of Linguistics",
    issn = "2333-9683",
    publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Distributivity in Formal Semantics

    AU - Champollion, Lucas

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - Distributivity in natural language occurs in sentences such as John and Mary (each) took a deep breath, when a predicate that is combined with a plurality-denoting expression is understood as holding of each of the members of that plurality. Language provides ways to express distributivity overtly, with words such as English each, but also covertly, when no one word can be regarded as contributing it. Both overt and covert distributivity occur in a wide variety of constructions. This article reviews and synthesizes influential approaches to distributivity in formal semantics and includes pointers to some more recent approaches. Theories of distributivity can be distinguished on the basis of how they answer a number of interrelated questions: To what extent can distributivity be attributed to what we know about the world, as opposed to the meanings of words or silent operators? What is the relationship between distributivity and plurality? Does distributivity always reach down to the singular individuals in a plurality? If not, under what circumstances is distributivity over subgroups possible, and what is its relation to distributivity over individuals?

    AB - Distributivity in natural language occurs in sentences such as John and Mary (each) took a deep breath, when a predicate that is combined with a plurality-denoting expression is understood as holding of each of the members of that plurality. Language provides ways to express distributivity overtly, with words such as English each, but also covertly, when no one word can be regarded as contributing it. Both overt and covert distributivity occur in a wide variety of constructions. This article reviews and synthesizes influential approaches to distributivity in formal semantics and includes pointers to some more recent approaches. Theories of distributivity can be distinguished on the basis of how they answer a number of interrelated questions: To what extent can distributivity be attributed to what we know about the world, as opposed to the meanings of words or silent operators? What is the relationship between distributivity and plurality? Does distributivity always reach down to the singular individuals in a plurality? If not, under what circumstances is distributivity over subgroups possible, and what is its relation to distributivity over individuals?

    KW - covers

    KW - Distributivity

    KW - groups

    KW - mereology

    KW - operators

    KW - plurality

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060079108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060079108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012528

    DO - 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012528

    M3 - Review article

    AN - SCOPUS:85060079108

    VL - 5

    SP - 289

    EP - 308

    JO - Annual Review of Linguistics

    JF - Annual Review of Linguistics

    SN - 2333-9683

    ER -