Distributive justice and CEO compensation

Guillermina Jasso, Eva M Meyersson Milgrom

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article develops a framework for studying individuals' ideas about what constitutes just compensation for chief executive officers (CEOs) and reports estimates of just CEO pay and the principles guiding ideas of justice. The sample consists of students pursuing a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree in Sweden and the United States. The framework, based on justice theory and making use of Rossi's factorial survey method, enables assessment of ideas of fairness in CEO compensation, including (1) the just CEO compensation, in the eyes of each observer; (2) the principles of microjustice - observers' ideas about 'who should get what' based on characteristics of CEOs and their firms; and (3) principles of macrojustice - ideas about the just level and dispersion in compensation across all CEOs. Our estimates yield the following main results: First, there is broad agreement on the median just CEO compensation but substantial inter-individual variation in the principles of microjustice and the other principles of macrojustice. Second, there is remarkable similarity in the distributions of the principles of microjustice and macrojustice across the MBA groups. Other important results include a pervasive gender attentiveness among MBA students and tolerance for large variability in CEO pay.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)123-143
    Number of pages21
    JournalActa Sociologica
    Volume51
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2008

    Fingerprint

    distributive justice
    business administration
    justice
    fairness
    tolerance
    Sweden
    student
    firm
    gender

    Keywords

    • Atkinson measure
    • CEO compensation
    • Factorial survey method
    • Fairness
    • Gender
    • Gini coefficient
    • Inequality
    • Justice theory
    • MBA students
    • Theil's inequality measures

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Distributive justice and CEO compensation. / Jasso, Guillermina; Milgrom, Eva M Meyersson.

    In: Acta Sociologica, Vol. 51, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 123-143.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Jasso, G & Milgrom, EMM 2008, 'Distributive justice and CEO compensation', Acta Sociologica, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699308090039
    Jasso, Guillermina ; Milgrom, Eva M Meyersson. / Distributive justice and CEO compensation. In: Acta Sociologica. 2008 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 123-143.
    @article{0c1e839646be4cd6ba424ccbd3428f38,
    title = "Distributive justice and CEO compensation",
    abstract = "This article develops a framework for studying individuals' ideas about what constitutes just compensation for chief executive officers (CEOs) and reports estimates of just CEO pay and the principles guiding ideas of justice. The sample consists of students pursuing a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree in Sweden and the United States. The framework, based on justice theory and making use of Rossi's factorial survey method, enables assessment of ideas of fairness in CEO compensation, including (1) the just CEO compensation, in the eyes of each observer; (2) the principles of microjustice - observers' ideas about 'who should get what' based on characteristics of CEOs and their firms; and (3) principles of macrojustice - ideas about the just level and dispersion in compensation across all CEOs. Our estimates yield the following main results: First, there is broad agreement on the median just CEO compensation but substantial inter-individual variation in the principles of microjustice and the other principles of macrojustice. Second, there is remarkable similarity in the distributions of the principles of microjustice and macrojustice across the MBA groups. Other important results include a pervasive gender attentiveness among MBA students and tolerance for large variability in CEO pay.",
    keywords = "Atkinson measure, CEO compensation, Factorial survey method, Fairness, Gender, Gini coefficient, Inequality, Justice theory, MBA students, Theil's inequality measures",
    author = "Guillermina Jasso and Milgrom, {Eva M Meyersson}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1177/0001699308090039",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "51",
    pages = "123--143",
    journal = "Acta Sociologica",
    issn = "0001-6993",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Distributive justice and CEO compensation

    AU - Jasso, Guillermina

    AU - Milgrom, Eva M Meyersson

    PY - 2008/6

    Y1 - 2008/6

    N2 - This article develops a framework for studying individuals' ideas about what constitutes just compensation for chief executive officers (CEOs) and reports estimates of just CEO pay and the principles guiding ideas of justice. The sample consists of students pursuing a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree in Sweden and the United States. The framework, based on justice theory and making use of Rossi's factorial survey method, enables assessment of ideas of fairness in CEO compensation, including (1) the just CEO compensation, in the eyes of each observer; (2) the principles of microjustice - observers' ideas about 'who should get what' based on characteristics of CEOs and their firms; and (3) principles of macrojustice - ideas about the just level and dispersion in compensation across all CEOs. Our estimates yield the following main results: First, there is broad agreement on the median just CEO compensation but substantial inter-individual variation in the principles of microjustice and the other principles of macrojustice. Second, there is remarkable similarity in the distributions of the principles of microjustice and macrojustice across the MBA groups. Other important results include a pervasive gender attentiveness among MBA students and tolerance for large variability in CEO pay.

    AB - This article develops a framework for studying individuals' ideas about what constitutes just compensation for chief executive officers (CEOs) and reports estimates of just CEO pay and the principles guiding ideas of justice. The sample consists of students pursuing a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree in Sweden and the United States. The framework, based on justice theory and making use of Rossi's factorial survey method, enables assessment of ideas of fairness in CEO compensation, including (1) the just CEO compensation, in the eyes of each observer; (2) the principles of microjustice - observers' ideas about 'who should get what' based on characteristics of CEOs and their firms; and (3) principles of macrojustice - ideas about the just level and dispersion in compensation across all CEOs. Our estimates yield the following main results: First, there is broad agreement on the median just CEO compensation but substantial inter-individual variation in the principles of microjustice and the other principles of macrojustice. Second, there is remarkable similarity in the distributions of the principles of microjustice and macrojustice across the MBA groups. Other important results include a pervasive gender attentiveness among MBA students and tolerance for large variability in CEO pay.

    KW - Atkinson measure

    KW - CEO compensation

    KW - Factorial survey method

    KW - Fairness

    KW - Gender

    KW - Gini coefficient

    KW - Inequality

    KW - Justice theory

    KW - MBA students

    KW - Theil's inequality measures

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44349129100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44349129100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0001699308090039

    DO - 10.1177/0001699308090039

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:44349129100

    VL - 51

    SP - 123

    EP - 143

    JO - Acta Sociologica

    JF - Acta Sociologica

    SN - 0001-6993

    IS - 2

    ER -