Distributive justice

Guillermina Jasso, Kjell Y. Törnblom, Clara Sabbagh

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Humans form ideas of fairness, and they assess the fairness or unfairness of the rewards that they and others receive. These ideas and assessments set in motion a large train of behavioral and social consequences, at all levels of analysis, across farflung topical domains, and in groups of all sizes. This chapter provides an overview of the world of distributive justice, starting with the three key actors-Allocator, Observer, and Rewardee-and the three key terms-Actual Reward, Just Reward, Justice Evaluation, and Justice Consequences-and embedding them in four basic processes: 1. Actual Reward Process. The Allocator, guided by allocation rules, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Actual Reward for the Rewardee. 2. Just Reward Process. The Observer, guided by justice principles, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Just Reward for the Rewardee. 3. Justice Evaluation Process. The Observer compares the Actual Reward to the Just Reward, generating the Justice Evaluation. 4. Justice Consequences Process. The Justice Evaluation triggers a long train of Justice Consequences, possibly incorporating non-justice factors-stretching out to all domains of human behavior and the social life and giving distributive justice the character of a basic sociobehavioral force. These processes may vary by the configuration of Allocator, Observer, Rewardee, Reward, and features of the spatiotemporal context. The challenge is to accumulate reliable knowledge about their operation, and to that end the chapter briefly examines theoretical contributions and empirical research designs. Along the way, the chapter discusses (1) the link between inequality, poverty, and injustice, (2) the possibility that, given the Hatfield Principle whereby ideas of Just Rewards vary across Observers, voting rules that produce Actual Rewards by averaging Just Rewards may reduce inequality in the Actual Reward Distribution, and (3) the longstanding idea that distributive justice is a cornerstone of the emerging general theory of behavioral and social phenomena.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationHandbook of Social Justice Theory and Research
    PublisherSpringer New York
    Pages201-218
    Number of pages18
    ISBN (Electronic)9781493932160
    ISBN (Print)9781493932153
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    distributive justice
    reward
    justice
    evaluation
    fairness
    social effects
    research planning
    voting
    empirical research

    Keywords

    • Actual reward process
    • Deductive and nondeductive theory
    • Just reward process
    • Justice consequences process
    • Justice evaluation process
    • Research designs

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Jasso, G., Törnblom, K. Y., & Sabbagh, C. (2016). Distributive justice. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 201-218). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11

    Distributive justice. / Jasso, Guillermina; Törnblom, Kjell Y.; Sabbagh, Clara.

    Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York, 2016. p. 201-218.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Jasso, G, Törnblom, KY & Sabbagh, C 2016, Distributive justice. in Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York, pp. 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11
    Jasso G, Törnblom KY, Sabbagh C. Distributive justice. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York. 2016. p. 201-218 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11
    Jasso, Guillermina ; Törnblom, Kjell Y. ; Sabbagh, Clara. / Distributive justice. Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York, 2016. pp. 201-218
    @inbook{969c08488319447f914f168612ba966a,
    title = "Distributive justice",
    abstract = "Humans form ideas of fairness, and they assess the fairness or unfairness of the rewards that they and others receive. These ideas and assessments set in motion a large train of behavioral and social consequences, at all levels of analysis, across farflung topical domains, and in groups of all sizes. This chapter provides an overview of the world of distributive justice, starting with the three key actors-Allocator, Observer, and Rewardee-and the three key terms-Actual Reward, Just Reward, Justice Evaluation, and Justice Consequences-and embedding them in four basic processes: 1. Actual Reward Process. The Allocator, guided by allocation rules, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Actual Reward for the Rewardee. 2. Just Reward Process. The Observer, guided by justice principles, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Just Reward for the Rewardee. 3. Justice Evaluation Process. The Observer compares the Actual Reward to the Just Reward, generating the Justice Evaluation. 4. Justice Consequences Process. The Justice Evaluation triggers a long train of Justice Consequences, possibly incorporating non-justice factors-stretching out to all domains of human behavior and the social life and giving distributive justice the character of a basic sociobehavioral force. These processes may vary by the configuration of Allocator, Observer, Rewardee, Reward, and features of the spatiotemporal context. The challenge is to accumulate reliable knowledge about their operation, and to that end the chapter briefly examines theoretical contributions and empirical research designs. Along the way, the chapter discusses (1) the link between inequality, poverty, and injustice, (2) the possibility that, given the Hatfield Principle whereby ideas of Just Rewards vary across Observers, voting rules that produce Actual Rewards by averaging Just Rewards may reduce inequality in the Actual Reward Distribution, and (3) the longstanding idea that distributive justice is a cornerstone of the emerging general theory of behavioral and social phenomena.",
    keywords = "Actual reward process, Deductive and nondeductive theory, Just reward process, Justice consequences process, Justice evaluation process, Research designs",
    author = "Guillermina Jasso and T{\"o}rnblom, {Kjell Y.} and Clara Sabbagh",
    year = "2016",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9781493932153",
    pages = "201--218",
    booktitle = "Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    address = "United States",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Distributive justice

    AU - Jasso, Guillermina

    AU - Törnblom, Kjell Y.

    AU - Sabbagh, Clara

    PY - 2016/1/1

    Y1 - 2016/1/1

    N2 - Humans form ideas of fairness, and they assess the fairness or unfairness of the rewards that they and others receive. These ideas and assessments set in motion a large train of behavioral and social consequences, at all levels of analysis, across farflung topical domains, and in groups of all sizes. This chapter provides an overview of the world of distributive justice, starting with the three key actors-Allocator, Observer, and Rewardee-and the three key terms-Actual Reward, Just Reward, Justice Evaluation, and Justice Consequences-and embedding them in four basic processes: 1. Actual Reward Process. The Allocator, guided by allocation rules, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Actual Reward for the Rewardee. 2. Just Reward Process. The Observer, guided by justice principles, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Just Reward for the Rewardee. 3. Justice Evaluation Process. The Observer compares the Actual Reward to the Just Reward, generating the Justice Evaluation. 4. Justice Consequences Process. The Justice Evaluation triggers a long train of Justice Consequences, possibly incorporating non-justice factors-stretching out to all domains of human behavior and the social life and giving distributive justice the character of a basic sociobehavioral force. These processes may vary by the configuration of Allocator, Observer, Rewardee, Reward, and features of the spatiotemporal context. The challenge is to accumulate reliable knowledge about their operation, and to that end the chapter briefly examines theoretical contributions and empirical research designs. Along the way, the chapter discusses (1) the link between inequality, poverty, and injustice, (2) the possibility that, given the Hatfield Principle whereby ideas of Just Rewards vary across Observers, voting rules that produce Actual Rewards by averaging Just Rewards may reduce inequality in the Actual Reward Distribution, and (3) the longstanding idea that distributive justice is a cornerstone of the emerging general theory of behavioral and social phenomena.

    AB - Humans form ideas of fairness, and they assess the fairness or unfairness of the rewards that they and others receive. These ideas and assessments set in motion a large train of behavioral and social consequences, at all levels of analysis, across farflung topical domains, and in groups of all sizes. This chapter provides an overview of the world of distributive justice, starting with the three key actors-Allocator, Observer, and Rewardee-and the three key terms-Actual Reward, Just Reward, Justice Evaluation, and Justice Consequences-and embedding them in four basic processes: 1. Actual Reward Process. The Allocator, guided by allocation rules, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Actual Reward for the Rewardee. 2. Just Reward Process. The Observer, guided by justice principles, uses Rewardee characteristics and other inputs to generate the Just Reward for the Rewardee. 3. Justice Evaluation Process. The Observer compares the Actual Reward to the Just Reward, generating the Justice Evaluation. 4. Justice Consequences Process. The Justice Evaluation triggers a long train of Justice Consequences, possibly incorporating non-justice factors-stretching out to all domains of human behavior and the social life and giving distributive justice the character of a basic sociobehavioral force. These processes may vary by the configuration of Allocator, Observer, Rewardee, Reward, and features of the spatiotemporal context. The challenge is to accumulate reliable knowledge about their operation, and to that end the chapter briefly examines theoretical contributions and empirical research designs. Along the way, the chapter discusses (1) the link between inequality, poverty, and injustice, (2) the possibility that, given the Hatfield Principle whereby ideas of Just Rewards vary across Observers, voting rules that produce Actual Rewards by averaging Just Rewards may reduce inequality in the Actual Reward Distribution, and (3) the longstanding idea that distributive justice is a cornerstone of the emerging general theory of behavioral and social phenomena.

    KW - Actual reward process

    KW - Deductive and nondeductive theory

    KW - Just reward process

    KW - Justice consequences process

    KW - Justice evaluation process

    KW - Research designs

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006789374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006789374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11

    DO - 10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781493932153

    SP - 201

    EP - 218

    BT - Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research

    PB - Springer New York

    ER -